Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

'Man tax' to Pay for Abuse of Women?
World Net Daily ^ | 10/07/2004 | WND Staff

Posted on 10/07/2004 12:01:20 AM PDT by walford

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last
Somehow I think this increase in violent crimes against European women may have more to do with a demographic shift that is characterized by increasing numbers of men coming from places wherein women are regarded as livestock. But no! Let's just tax all of the men!

In Norway women are expected to put up with this also rather than the immigrant men adapting the ways of civilized society:

...So Muslim immigrants to Norway should be made aware that things are a little different in Scandinavia? Not at all! Rather, the professor insisted, "Norwegian women must take their share of responsibility for these rapes" because their manner of dress would be regarded by Muslim men as inappropriate. "Norwegian women must realize that we live in a multicultural society and adapt themselves to it." Or to modify Queen Victoria's wedding-night advice to her daughter: Lie back and think of Yemen...
1 posted on 10/07/2004 12:01:20 AM PDT by walford
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: walford
I have no problem with men in this country who abuse women being forced to provide financial assistance, through a 3rd party, to them while the men are locked up in cold cell (where they belong). But to tax ALL men is pretty stupid.
2 posted on 10/07/2004 12:04:42 AM PDT by Artemis Webb
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford
Imagine a republican or conservative say in the press,

American women neeed to take some responsibility for their rapes for dressing the way they do...

How long do you expect would such an idiot have before impeachment and before the death threats began..
I can't believe that someone can be that stupid...
3 posted on 10/07/2004 12:05:49 AM PDT by DSBull (Truth is the light of the World, shine it everywhere)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

How many immigrants are there to Norway per year?

I'm just asking.


4 posted on 10/07/2004 12:10:09 AM PDT by spinestein (Nov 2nd. Don't forget to flush the Johns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford
This guy might be on to something!

Tax segments of society with a propensity to create a particular social ill.

Maybe we in America should heavily tax the poor. That the poor have a propensity to that particular social ill of being poor is axiomatic. One gets less of what one taxes.

The time has come to tax the poor out of existence.
5 posted on 10/07/2004 12:12:05 AM PDT by The Great Yazoo (JFK: He's a real nowhere man, Sitting in his nowhereland, Making all his nowhere plans For nobody)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

Scandinavia - a laboratory for observing the effects of end-stage liberalism. What a total hellhole.


6 posted on 10/07/2004 12:12:23 AM PDT by Bogolyubski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford
"We have to have a discussion so that men understand that they have a collective financial responsibility."

What more is there to understand than that this is a completely meritless idea proposed by special interests suffering from collectivist mania?

7 posted on 10/07/2004 12:15:39 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

There was a thread about Mexicans going to Europe, the Netherlands IIRC. Good question!


8 posted on 10/07/2004 12:16:29 AM PDT by endthematrix (Bad news is good news for the Kerry campaign!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: walford

Have they rigged toilet seats so they don't stay up in Sweden? That's about the mental level that society is at.


9 posted on 10/07/2004 12:17:45 AM PDT by Post Toasties
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
How many immigrants are there to Norway per year?

Europe is being bred out. It is not only immigration, it is the relative birthrates of those of European descent compared to their prolific immigrant guests. From the linked article in my first post:

"...Islam For All reported the other day that, at present demographic rates, in 20 years' time the majority of Holland's children (the population under 18) will be Muslim. It will be the first Islamic country in western Europe since the loss of Spain. Europe is the colony now...

...in the case of those Muslim ghettoes in Sydney, in Oslo, in Paris, in Copenhagen and in Manchester, multiculturalism means that the worst attributes of Muslim culture -- the subjugation of women -- combine with the worst attributes of Western culture -- licence and self-gratification..."
10 posted on 10/07/2004 12:18:38 AM PDT by walford (http://utopia-unmasked.us)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: spinestein

I find that whole Norske comment odd, considering that Norway is a very racist country. Yeah, their governement lets these people in, but the general population would rather see anyone with brown skin forcefully exported than acccept "responsibility" for the way they dress.


11 posted on 10/07/2004 12:20:36 AM PDT by CBF ('' .... behind every blade of grass.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: CBF

Is every man taxed at the same rate. Or is there a luxury tax imposed for some....ah never mind.


12 posted on 10/07/2004 12:24:55 AM PDT by Dat Mon (clever tagline under construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: Post Toasties

Ahh actually I like that idea.
I should introduce them over here :P


13 posted on 10/07/2004 12:26:42 AM PDT by Selkie
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: walford

Does a couple who are consensual to Sadistic Masochist relationship with the Male being dominate exempt from this tax.


14 posted on 10/07/2004 12:29:23 AM PDT by oceanperch ( Mt. St. Helens is nothing compared to the stuff Kerry spews.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: spinestein
As to your question, I don't know, but the problem lies in the social cost of this immigration. With socialized health care and security, most of the immigrants in Norway are total freeloaders and have learned from previous relatives who have relocated exactly how to take advantage of the system. To the detriment of naturalized Norwegians, the government supports these people with apartments, living expenses, education, reeducation if needed, and even gov. supported loans so that they can start their own businesses. On the other hand, a naturalized Norwegian is just taxed to death to support the cost.

America better wake up because we are heading down the same road. The immigrant situation in America is nearing an epidemic and the government is getting only more accommodating in the spirit of humanity. Where does that all lead, millions of leaches (more than we already have) on the system, and higher taxes on those who are productive and not out to take advantage to pay for it.

Norway and many other EU countries are so far along down that road that there is nearly no possibility for reversal from the nanny state. Will America learn from their mistakes before it is too late??? We knew the difference from freedom and serfdom 230 years ago? Why are we bound and determined to give it away without a fight now??

15 posted on 10/07/2004 12:29:34 AM PDT by CBF ('' .... behind every blade of grass.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Dat Mon
No - not never mind. The taxes are horrendous. How does from 28 - 52% strike you. Last year I paid 36% of my gross income in income taxes, this year 39%. I have a friend that does not have his own business, (less deductions) and last year he paid 46% of his gross. Add that to a 24% sales tax on ALL goods and services, $5.00 per gallon in gasoline and a 2004 Jeep Cherokee costing $105,000 at the dealer, and you have a real mess. Sorry if I offend any Norwegians reading this but Norway SUCKS.
16 posted on 10/07/2004 12:35:29 AM PDT by CBF ('' .... behind every blade of grass.'')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: CBF

Sorry, I was trying a little humor to lighten things up. But I realize that actuallly LIVING in a horrendous system like you describe is no laughing matter.

My first reaction to this man tax was like how absurd can you get?

My sympathies to you and yours mon.


17 posted on 10/07/2004 1:07:45 AM PDT by Dat Mon (clever tagline under construction)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: walford
women are regarded as livestock.

Are you isinuating they are not? I mean, what's more important? Your goats and camels or your women? :-)


FREEPER (PARodrig) PAUL RODRIGUEZ FOR CONGRESS

18 posted on 10/07/2004 1:09:46 AM PDT by Cacique (quos Deus vult perdere, prius dementat)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford
I'll agree with this "man tax" provided they tax just as heavily those women who keep returning to abusive men.

Takes two to tango. Not that the feminazis appreciate this, mind you...

19 posted on 10/07/2004 1:12:59 AM PDT by Prime Choice (It is dangerous to be right when wicked is called 'good.')
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: walford

When's the "Muslim tax" being considered?


20 posted on 10/07/2004 4:40:32 AM PDT by thoughtomator ("Allahu Snackbar!" - the war cry of the pajamadeen - Let's stop VOTE FRAUD NOW! Write your reps!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-22 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson