Posted on 11/03/2004 12:54:40 PM PST by aft_lizard
Iowa President 2079 of 2079 precincts - 100 percent George W. Bush (i) Rep 745,742 - 50 percent John F. Kerry Dem 732,492 - 49 percent Ralph Nader PEC 5,811 - 0 percent Michael Badnarik Lib 2,893 - 0 percent Michael Peroutka CST 1,295 - 0 percent David Cobb Grn 1,107 - 0 percent James Harris SWP 361 - 0 percent Bill Van Auken PEC 162 - 0 percent
New Mexico President 1482 of 1495 precincts - 99 percent George W. Bush (i) Rep 363,386 - 50 percent John F. Kerry Dem 351,197 - 49 percent Ralph Nader Ind 3,822 - 1 percent Michael Badnarik Lib 2,269 - 0 percent David Cobb Grn 1,170 - 0 percent Michael Peroutka CST 750 - 0 percent
* New Mexico President * New Mexico U.S. House District 1 * New Mexico U.S. House District 2 * New Mexico U.S. House District 3
Has it been "called" yet?
NM would be a moral victory - there'd be no discontinuity in the sea of red!
Darn Fraud, and thats what won MI,PA and WI for SKerry too.
ping
Iowa President
2079 of 2079 precincts - 100 percent
George W. Bush (i) Rep 745,742 - 50 percent
John F. Kerry Dem 732,492 - 49 percent
Ralph Nader PEC 5,811 - 0 percent
Michael Badnarik Lib 2,893 - 0 percent
Michael Peroutka CST 1,295 - 0 percent
David Cobb Grn 1,108 - 0 percent
James Harris SWP 361 - 0 percent
Bill Van Auken PEC 159 - 0 percent
New Mexico President
1482 of 1495 precincts - 99 percent
George W. Bush (i) Rep 363,386 - 50 percent
John F. Kerry Dem 351,197 - 49 percent
Ralph Nader Ind 3,822 - 1 percent
Michael Badnarik Lib 2,269 - 0 percent
David Cobb Grn 1,170 - 0 percent
Michael Peroutka CST 750 - 0 percent
Dan Rather has just assaulted Ed Bradley for mentioning that Iowa looks like it will finally go for the President.
No word as to Mr. Bradley's injuries.
Mr. Rather was seen storming off the CBS News stage muttering "But we had Burkett. We had the memos. We had missing weapons. There was Halliburton. The votes can't be right. TURN THOSE MACHINES BACK ON! TURN THOSE MACHINES BACK ON!"
i think PA could flip.....wont matter though, they'll never be counted.
Good job, Iowans. You made my prediction wrong, and I'm glad to eat crow on that. You've returned to the Light after a sojourn to The Dark Side for a few election cycles. So, hats off to the hard-working farm folks, even if you did clobber the Buckeyes this year...:-(
Not by the talking heads for some reason, there is no more votes to be counted in Iowa, accept maybe for a few trickle in ballots that have Nov 2 postmarks.
In 2000 they called it for Gore when he won with a 12000 vote lead.
Dear God.
Please tell me you're joking!
Iowa usually trends Democratic so this is the first time since 1984 the state's gone GOP.
I hav a feeling that Ed Bradley would like to be assaulted by Rather, he seems kind of a tinkerbell to me.
286 EV's for Bush, with PA and WI still possible.
I hope New Mexico goes Kerry, amnd it triggers a DOJ investigation there. Since Richardson is the likely running mate for Hillary in 2008, let's go get him.
BWAHAHAHA!!!!
I saw that exchange last night over Ohio. The talking heads are missing out on some fun not using it!
you know...I would love to see the TRUE vote count in PN and WI w/o the voter fraud in Philadelphia and Milwaukee, respectively and w/ a full military/absentee vote. I bet W wins those states handily. Wouldn't an additional 31 EC votes be nice? 317 has a really nice ring.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.