Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Open Letter to Senator Frist about the Chairmanship of the Judiciary Committee
Right Side Redux ^ | 11/02/04 | Justin Hart

Posted on 11/04/2004 9:32:57 AM PST by RightSideRedux

Published on Right Side Redux

Senator Frist,

I implore you not to allow Senator Specter to become chairman of the Judiciary. His recent arrogance about judges that President Bush should and should not appoint is feckless liberalism at its worst. The assumptive power he pretends to own is not his yet and should not be his.

As a Republican volunteer in Virginia and Florida I would be sorely disappointed if Specter is put in as the Chairman. We worked countless hours to elect President Bush and for specific reasons. The obligation of the ruling majority is to listen to the people who put you there. Please do not mistake our current enthusiasm and support for the Republican victory as license to ignore our base values. We will not soon forget such an outrage.

On a lighter note: Congratulations for the well deserved victory. We are amazed at the courage and hours you and your colleagues put in for this election. It is well deserved!

Justin Hart


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

1 posted on 11/04/2004 9:32:58 AM PST by RightSideRedux
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

Excellent Letter. Thanks for the post.


2 posted on 11/04/2004 9:34:52 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

The problem is if Specter is denied the Chair, he may well decide to flip suits or Jeffords it. It isn't quite as simple as just denying him a slot that he would ordinarily assume.


3 posted on 11/04/2004 9:36:00 AM PST by Carling (What happened to Sandy Burglar's Docs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

I sent the following letter to Senator Hagel

Specter warns Bush on high court nominations"

Senator Hagel,

Most of your constituents have felt you were trying to undermine President Bush's reelection. We told you we will fight your reelection. I have spoke with dozens of people about this. My church groups and politically active friends were dismayed with Specter made the above statement. We knew he was challenging the president, after the president agreed to support him. They were wrong in there support.

You will have a chance to redeem yourself to the voters. We need a strong republican who is willing to stand up against the NARAL'S and gay lobbyist.... Most of all we need someone who will fight and stand up to the media (might mean they would like you anymore) to get President Bush's judicial nominee's through, we need someone who won't give in or up. I will be sending this e-mail to many people. I'm sure they will be passing it on also. If you want to be president/vp in 2008, you need to get your own state. We need to see that you will stand up for Nebraska values. If you can't fight this battle boldly, winning the presidency will be even more of a challenge. Almost 70% of Nebraskans spoke Tuesday and we hope you heard what we were saying. Please show us what you can do. Thank you


4 posted on 11/04/2004 9:37:34 AM PST by Linda Sandoval (mom's for common sense judges)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

The Specter issue will put a spotlight on the power of all committee chairmen in the Senate and then to the rules of the Senate that give individual Senators too much power to obstruct action. Especially important is abolishing the 60% rule.


5 posted on 11/04/2004 9:39:10 AM PST by bayourod (Specter's litmus test : "No Christian Judges")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

Believe I heard (radio) that Specter is issuing a statement later today to clarify this.


6 posted on 11/04/2004 9:39:48 AM PST by sarasota
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

Just e-mailed Frist at:

http://frist.senate.gov/index.cfm?FuseAction=AboutSenatorFrist.ContactForm


7 posted on 11/04/2004 9:40:14 AM PST by LibFreeOrDie (A Freep a day keeps the liberals away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

Rush said Sen. Specter is about to issue a statement shortly. Possibility that news reporter misreported.


8 posted on 11/04/2004 9:41:43 AM PST by airborne (God answers all prayers. Sometimes the answer is ,"No".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Carling

"...Specter...may well decide to flip suits or Jeffords it."

We have Senators to spare this time, don't we?


9 posted on 11/04/2004 9:41:48 AM PST by LibFreeOrDie (A Freep a day keeps the liberals away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: sarasota

He's transcribing the tape of the interview in order to show he did not say what is being reported.


10 posted on 11/04/2004 9:42:35 AM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: airborne

"misreported" aka "lied"


11 posted on 11/04/2004 9:43:44 AM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Carling
"The problem is if Specter is denied the Chair, he may well decide to flip suits or Jeffords it."

Unless he can get five more Republicans to switch parties he will be severly hurting himself.

The Dems have nothing to gain by his switching. He will start at the bottom---the lowest member of the minority party. His office will be a closet next to the public restrooms.

12 posted on 11/04/2004 9:43:48 AM PST by bayourod (Specter's litmus test : "No Christian Judges")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: LibFreeOrDie

Senators to spare, yes, but each seat on committees count.

I'd prefer to keep Specter out of the Judiciary chair, but the Senate GOP needs to isolate him from the other side first. Basically, neutralize him somehow, then give him his pink slip.


13 posted on 11/04/2004 9:44:08 AM PST by Carling (What happened to Sandy Burglar's Docs?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: cyncooper

He's said stuff like this before. The Pittsburgh Post-Gazette endorsed him because he promised not to let any "extremist" judges through. The Kerry/Spector campaign signs from the eastern part of the state were not a mistake.


14 posted on 11/04/2004 9:46:08 AM PST by Varda
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

thanks for the suggestion. I too sent an email to him. maybe if enough are sent, Frist will tell spector to take a hike. Speculation, don't be shocked if spector switches parites.


15 posted on 11/04/2004 9:47:24 AM PST by Trepz
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Varda

I'm well aware of Specter's history.

Context and timing are as relevant as they always are. And if the media has misrepresented what he said, it is important to acknowledge that.


16 posted on 11/04/2004 9:48:03 AM PST by cyncooper (And an angel still rides in the whirlwind and directs this storm)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: Carling

There is plenty of new blood in the Senate. Given the failure of Specter to deal with first term judicial nominees it is perfectly reasonable for him to be removed as chairman.

If you have to make him chairman of some other less vital committee because it's Washington politics I can understand that. Bush can't do this, it has to be done internally in the Senate so I'm probably wasting my time typing this-- but we can always hope for and expect the right thing.


17 posted on 11/04/2004 9:50:05 AM PST by Ragnorak
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Carling

At this moment in history, I'd rather see a conservative on the Supreme Court than a conservative on a House/Senate committee.


18 posted on 11/04/2004 9:50:56 AM PST by LibFreeOrDie (A Freep a day keeps the liberals away.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Carling

So what if he flips? It wouldn't affect the balance of power.


19 posted on 11/04/2004 9:51:05 AM PST by jmstein7 (A Judge not bound by the original meaning of the Constitution interprets nothing but his own mind.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: RightSideRedux

Frist and Bush please please wake up and listen to your constituency. We have gone out and backed you against all odds please do whats right and give us judges who enforce the constitution and do not make their own laws.


20 posted on 11/04/2004 9:52:20 AM PST by sasafras (sasafras (The road to hell is paved with good intentions))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-34 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson