Skip to comments.
Renominate Miguel Estrada
Wall Street Journal ^
Posted on 11/04/2004 7:14:27 PM PST by GoldwaterAvenger
Mr. Leahys unprecedented stonewalling of judges (49 of Mr. Bushs nominees are still pending) fed the public perception that todays Democrats deal from the bottom of the deck. Special credit goes to liberal lobbyist Ralph Neas, whose tireless slander of qualified judges helped boost GOP turnout in Texas, Georgia and Missouri. The Bush nominees should put Mr. Neas on their Christmas list.
(Excerpt) Read more at nrsc.org ...
TOPICS: Editorial; Government; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: judicial; judicialnominees; miguelestrada; nominee; scotus
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
The ultimate vindication(and bitchslap to Daschle)--the renomination of Miguel Estrada. This man is the IDEAL replacement for Rehnquist.
To: GoldwaterAvenger
2
posted on
11/04/2004 7:15:54 PM PST
by
syriacus
(I'm commanded to love appeaseniks -- but I don't have to vote for one as Commander-in-chief.)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
The hell with that, renominate Bork if you really want to piss them off, heh.
To: lord of the righties
I thought the same thing... give them Bork!
4
posted on
11/04/2004 7:17:22 PM PST
by
Dan C
To: syriacus
Hey guys, what about Chief Justice Roy Moore from Alabama. He's also qualified to replace the other liberal judges in the Supreme Court.
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Renominate Miguel Estrada
Yes ! I want to be a proud member of the party that appoints the first Mexican American to the SCOTUS
6
posted on
11/04/2004 7:18:51 PM PST
by
ChadGore
(59,313,309 Bush fans can't be wrong.)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
How about Neal Boortz for Suprem Court? He is ant-abortion, but I think he would reverse Roe/Wade to allow the states to decide. He is a lawyer, and a strict constitutionalist.
He might be a good one, if he would take it.
7
posted on
11/04/2004 7:19:03 PM PST
by
FreeAtlanta
(never surrender, this is for the kids)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
If Specter gets the chairmanship of the judicial committee we won't get any conservatives out of committee.
Specter has already told the President not to nominate anyone the Democrats will filibuster, ie..pro-lifers, Christians and Catholics.
Please call your Senators and Frist and ask them not to vote for Specter.
8
posted on
11/04/2004 7:19:21 PM PST
by
bayourod
(Specter's litmus test : "No Christian Judges")
To: lord of the righties; Dan C
Great minds think alike. The ultimate Bork would be to nominate Bork!
9
posted on
11/04/2004 7:19:56 PM PST
by
Enterprise
(The left hates the Constitution. Islamic Fascism hates America. Natural allies.)
To: GoldwaterAvenger
10
posted on
11/04/2004 7:20:14 PM PST
by
PianoMan
(Priority One for the new government - STOP SPECTER)
To: Dan C
11
posted on
11/04/2004 7:24:48 PM PST
by
Mercat
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Make them cry
Replace Ashcroft with Estrada---WOW.
To: FreeAtlanta
As one of his listening faithful, I don't think Neal would want the job. He has too much fun hosting his show and is one of the absolute best in the radio biz.
Neal Boortz is actually the evolutionary archetype for the Republican party of the (near)future.
To: ChadGore
I don't believe that Miguel Estrada is a Mexican-American. He hails from Tegucigalpa, Hondouras. That hakes him a Hondouran-American.
To: Mercat
>how old is Bork?
I'd guess he is in his mid-60's
15
posted on
11/04/2004 7:39:44 PM PST
by
Dan C
To: GoldwaterAvenger
16
posted on
11/04/2004 7:41:01 PM PST
by
Uncle Miltie
(Democrat Obstructionists will be Daschled!)
To: jrolfedrev
Do you really want an explosion, then nominate Mark Levin and Laura Ingraham!
To: bayourod
Could someone tell me exactly how Specter will be able to cause all this havoc? If he really proves to be a nuisance, why won't Frist just boot him from the committee?
18
posted on
11/04/2004 7:51:59 PM PST
by
Gunder
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Yes, renominate Estrada.
To: GoldwaterAvenger
Last time I checked, ANN COULTER, is a lawyer and clerked for one of the Supremes.
Wouldn't it be nice to have her on the BENCH?
20
posted on
11/04/2004 7:57:56 PM PST
by
Prost1
(What is the difference between a Democrat and a Congential Liar?)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-36 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson