Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

“A realistic president would climb off his high horse so that Europeans could descend from theirs.”

Of course... apologize... I should have known. That's all they really want. Wring your hands and jump with 'Old Europe' into the mosh-pit of appeasement.

Our socialist 5th column never concede's defeat...and like rust, it never sleeps.

1 posted on 11/08/2004 3:40:14 AM PST by johnny7
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: johnny7

The same complaints for next four years. They still don't get it.


2 posted on 11/08/2004 3:41:24 AM PST by goldstategop (In Memory Of A Dearly Beloved Friend Who Lives On In My Heart Forever)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

Better to shoot at some goals and miss than not to have a "plan" and run around in circles and get nothing done.


3 posted on 11/08/2004 3:43:35 AM PST by Coldwater Creek ('We voted like we prayed")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

Do only Lib morons work in mainstream media?

I think Mallaby answers the question.

No wonder why we're kicking their asses.


4 posted on 11/08/2004 3:44:19 AM PST by Enduring Freedom (How do you ask a man to be the last man to VOTE for a mistake?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

Thank God you won.


5 posted on 11/08/2004 3:45:10 AM PST by agere_contra (Guardian Readers, Mirror Readers: you are brainless prats.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
It's too hard. Let's not even try. It can't be fixed.This is as good as it can be ...and It's Americas fault..WWAAAAAAAAAA
6 posted on 11/08/2004 3:46:27 AM PST by Defendingliberty (www.456th.com)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
The election offered an imperfect choice: A realistic Democrat who lacked vision,...

Stop right there. Kerry is a liar, a traitor, a hypocrite, a shameless panderer, a commie sympathizer, anti-military in vote, anti-defense in vote, anti-sovereignty in vote, anti-life in vote and he looks like a doofus. But he is not realistic and he did have a vision, he thought he could be President.

8 posted on 11/08/2004 3:49:24 AM PST by TigersEye (Intellectuals only exist if you think they do!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

They said the Arab street would rise up...W said different. They said Afghanistan would be a quagmire...W said different. They said you could never hold elections...W said different.

Who is grounded in reality?


9 posted on 11/08/2004 3:51:19 AM PST by ez (Let the tolerant tolerate my intolerance!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

And the misunderestimation continues...


10 posted on 11/08/2004 3:53:00 AM PST by AmericaUnited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

This is the sort of article wherein a journalist has happened on a cute aphorism and then tries to shoehorn his ideas into an unworkable format. Once upon a time editors dumped such articles without a second thought.


11 posted on 11/08/2004 3:53:37 AM PST by gaspar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
A realistic president would climb off his high horse so that Europeans could descend from theirs.

A realistic newspaper would realize just how much damage four years of non-stop Bush-bashing had already done to their beloved liberal power base -- just days ago, mind -- and try something (ANYthing) different, for a change.

Failing that: they might, at least, have just enough simple, garden variety common sense left to STFU.

12 posted on 11/08/2004 3:56:23 AM PST by KentTrappedInLiberalSeattle (I feel more and more like a revolted Charlton Heston, witnessing ape society for the very first time)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
It's obvious Mr. Mallaby never ran a business. There are infinitely more naysayers than there are doers in the world, especially in Government. Bush knows this. He set the agenda big and broad with hopes to accomplish some of it. If you set it low and only on what you think can be accomplished you are destine to fail a la Carter, Ford, and so many others.

This guy, like all the others, has proven irrelevant.
13 posted on 11/08/2004 3:56:56 AM PST by LisaS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

How 'bout we ask some of the thousands and thousands of terrorists who have been killed in Bush's war against terrorism just how 'real' their death feels?


14 posted on 11/08/2004 3:57:17 AM PST by jwpjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
...he fails the test of realism...

Aha! Today's talking point. I'll listen for its appearance on today's talk shows.

16 posted on 11/08/2004 4:01:09 AM PST by backhoe ("We met at Dawn- and destiny Prevailed...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

The principal use of The Washington comPost is source material for recycling!


17 posted on 11/08/2004 4:02:10 AM PST by leprechaun9
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

Another British twit who thinks that he knows best.

Speaks French of course (per bio)

18 posted on 11/08/2004 4:07:01 AM PST by raybbr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

Ronald Reagan was a visionary. Jimmy Carter was a realist.
The Wright brothers were visionaries. Werner Von Braun was a visionary. Thomas Edison was a visionary. Great things are done by visionaries that the "realists" say can't be done. I suspect, Bush will accomplish much if not all of his vision, because he believes it can be done.


19 posted on 11/08/2004 4:08:36 AM PST by jdluntjr
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
The election offered an imperfect choice: A realistic Democrat who lacked vision, or a visionary Republican who lacked realism.

The wealthy owners of this rag would like you to belive this crap; they hate the middle class and want to destroy it via socialism, making us into a European type society where there is no challenge to their power.

20 posted on 11/08/2004 4:16:21 AM PST by squirt-gun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
A realistic Democrat who lacked vision...

This is what amazes me about the democrats.  For all their talk about "progressivism," when was the last time they had a bold idea?

 

25 posted on 11/08/2004 5:06:15 AM PST by MNnice
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7

The vision thing:

Some see things as they are, and ask WHY?

I see how things could be, and ask Why Not?

---Bobby Kennedy.

Truman saw a democratic, free Western Europe...

Reagan saw a democratic, free Eastern Europe...

Bush sees a democratic, Free Near East.

Why not?


27 posted on 11/08/2004 5:24:53 AM PST by LadyDoc (liberals only love politically correct poor people)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: johnny7
On foreign policy, he had a chance to win over allies by apologizing for mistakes in Iraq and by having the wisdom to admit that the universal urge to be free does not actually guarantee that freedom will triumph.

Naysayers, all. It is they who lack vision.

All they want is for the world to stew in their socialist juices and they are upset because America is refusing to do so.

29 posted on 11/08/2004 5:45:00 AM PST by Gritty ("If the Democrat-media complex were around at our Revolution, there would be no America -Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson