Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Who Were the Greatest Military Commanders (Of All Time) ?

Posted on 11/14/2004 5:23:06 PM PST by Cyropaedia

In light of the upcoming film Alexander (the Great), who in your opinion were actually the greatest military commanders our world has known...?

Mine are Genghis Khan, Alexander, and U.S. Grant.


TOPICS: Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: milhist; militarycommanders; militaryhistory
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 741-748 next last
To: montag813

Joshua was the greatest commander of all time. Many of the other names mentioned copied or adapted techiniques of his in later battles, from Monty to Patton to the Wehrmacht.


601 posted on 12/22/2005 10:32:30 AM PST by montag813
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 599 | View Replies]

To: Williams
It was Grant who dispatched Sherman on his march, and the Union forces were stymied until Grant arrived on the scene to command all Union forces. I don't disagree that the Union had more men and materiel, but offense requires more. Grant was relentless and his genius lie in stubbornly pressing his advantage. He showed earlier determination and skill at Shiloh and Vicksburg.

Critics of Grant also neglect the way Grant turned a disadvantage to an advantage in the East. Prior to Grant's arrival all Union offensive campaigns were culminated by a single battle (where Lee's forces would send them reeling in general retreat) -- nothing lasting was achieved for the casualties expended. Grant, though he also lost battles to Lee, managed to maintain the general offensive despite his losses. No other Union general had that moral courage.

Lee may have been the better 'Napoleonic General' but Grant wasn't fighting a Napoleonic war anymore.

602 posted on 12/22/2005 10:32:57 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 134 | View Replies]

To: All

Quick fun contest: I will post a picture of your facorite military commander (if I can find one online) in honor of the first person to correctly identify the battle in the photo (post #598).


603 posted on 12/22/2005 10:33:38 AM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to join the MilHist ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 598 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Oops....should read "favorite"


604 posted on 12/22/2005 10:34:21 AM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to join the MilHist ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

I have to add in here Chaka Zulu

Of them all he probably did more with less than any of the others did.

Furthermore he created an empire and a legacy for his people that endures to this day.

No other Military Leader can make that claim.


605 posted on 12/22/2005 10:34:21 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SunkenCiv

i'll put in bids for jehosaphat (prolly speled wrong)
biblical king who destroyed multiple armies by using musicians.
and since i haven't seen this name yet..
frances marion the "swamp fox." brought guerrila warfare to the british and beat them down.


606 posted on 12/22/2005 10:34:48 AM PST by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 572 | View Replies]

To: ReadyNow

I like Wesley Clark. His strategy used to take down the Waco "compound" was brilliant. Janet Reno's assault to "rescue" Elian Gonzalez was also masterful.


607 posted on 12/22/2005 10:35:17 AM PST by attiladhun2 (evolution has both deified and degraded humanity)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

Hannibal, Alexander the Great, Julius Caesar, Genghis Khan, Napoleon, Frederick the Great, Chief Joseph, Thomas "Stonewall" Jackson


608 posted on 12/22/2005 10:35:57 AM PST by ZULU (Non nobis, non nobis, Domine, sed nomini tuo da gloriam. God, guts, and guns made America great.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: attiladhun2

LOL....good one.


609 posted on 12/22/2005 10:36:08 AM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to join the MilHist ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 607 | View Replies]

To: Norman Bates

Guderian was senior to Rommel. At the outset of the war, Guderian was a panzer corps commander while Rommel was a newly-minted panzer division commander. Guderian was tinkering with tank operations while Hitler was still running Hitlers body guard.


610 posted on 12/22/2005 10:37:01 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Thermopylae Pass

Spartans kicking tail on the Persians.


611 posted on 12/22/2005 10:38:28 AM PST by Leatherneck_MT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: MagnumRancid

Lee wasn't the same commander in 1864 as he had been in 1862, either.


612 posted on 12/22/2005 10:40:09 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 182 | View Replies]

To: Tallguy
The North gained great strategic advantage in 1861 when it captured West Virginia, kept Maryland in the Union by force, overcame the pro-Confederate governor of Missouri, and pushed Kentucky into neutrality and later into the Union camp. The very emphasis on states' rights that the Southerners treasured was part of their downfall. By deciding to fight a defensive war, Jefferson Davis and his cabinet permitted the Union to seize the initiative in the Border States. Remember that in the early months of the war, many citizens and politicians in the "lower" North, from central and southern Illinois to New Jersey and New York City, favored a peaceful parting of the Southern states. Even some abolitionists were not opposed to the independence of the South.

Leaders more aggressive than Lee and Jackson were in the beginning of the Civil War would have taken the war into Pennsylvania and Ohio in 1861 and 1862 and forced the Union to relinquish its claims to the Southern states.

613 posted on 12/22/2005 10:41:50 AM PST by Wallace T.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 593 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT; All

Ding....ding.....ding. We have a winner.

Congrats Leatherneck_MT....pics of your favorite commandeers to be posted in a few minutes.


614 posted on 12/22/2005 10:42:35 AM PST by indcons (FReepmail indcons to join the MilHist ping list)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Oops!

Well, I thank anyone who pinged me, and that does sound naughty, so I'll just leave it at that.

Merry, Merry Christmas!


615 posted on 12/22/2005 10:42:40 AM PST by BlessedByLiberty (Respectfully submitted,)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 596 | View Replies]

To: Wallace T.
Leaders more aggressive than Lee and Jackson were in the beginning of the Civil War would have taken the war into Pennsylvania and Ohio in 1861 and 1862 and forced the Union to relinquish its claims to the Southern states.

I don't see how this could have happened. The First Battle of Bull Run showed that both armies were not ready for prime time. Deep offensive thrusts were beyond their abilities. Neither side had, as yet, as significant riverine force of steam gunboats to support extended operations in 1861. By 1862 the Confederacy could not marshal sufficient forces to hold the line against widely separated attacks in the western theater. If we assume that the border states had 'gone with the Confederacy' then the military predicament would have been even worse.

616 posted on 12/22/2005 11:00:16 AM PST by Tallguy (When it's a bet between reality and delusion, bet on reality -- Mark Steyn)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 613 | View Replies]

To: clee1

I gotta agree with Schwartzkopf.

Pulled off a sneak attack despite modern day equipment (radar/satelites/hostile locals with cell phones, etc). Fooled the press and used them to his benefit.

Established air superiority. Pulled off a logistical miracle.


617 posted on 12/22/2005 11:01:37 AM PST by kidd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 179 | View Replies]

To: Cyropaedia

Sun Tzu...hands down


618 posted on 12/22/2005 11:02:40 AM PST by kajingawd (" happy with stone underhead, let Heaven and Earth go about their changes")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: indcons

Battle of Thermopylae

My favorite: Gideon


619 posted on 12/22/2005 11:03:13 AM PST by Sensei Ern (Now, IB4Z! http://www.myspace.com/reconcomedy/ "Cowards cut and run. Heroes never do!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 603 | View Replies]

To: Leatherneck_MT
Xenophon.

Many have attempted a similar feat since, but none have accomplished it.

620 posted on 12/22/2005 11:04:15 AM PST by RightWhale (pas de lieu, Rhone que nous)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 611 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 581-600601-620621-640 ... 741-748 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson