Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Ohio Provisional Ballots Seem Legitimate
AP ^ | 11/17/2004 | MARK WILLIAMS

Posted on 11/17/2004 10:51:40 AM PST by Tennessean4Bush

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last
To: libstripper; All

I think half of the Ballots would go to Kerry. There is no way in heck that he would overtake Bush lead.


41 posted on 11/17/2004 12:50:40 PM PST by KevinDavis (Let the meek inherit the Earth, the rest of us will explore the stars!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: Keith59
The main problem I have with provisional ballots is the danger of fraud. In theory all a person had to do, would be to front up at every polling place in the country and demand to vote. Who knows if they will be caught or not? Provisionals ballots was just another demorat grab at votes, along with motor voter.

Also, in my humble opinion, anyone too stupid to remember the precinct in which they are supposed to vote, should not be deciding who it is that will be running the most powerful nation on Earth.

42 posted on 11/17/2004 12:54:10 PM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies]

To: libstripper

I have no doubt.


43 posted on 11/17/2004 1:46:43 PM PST by NYFriend
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: libstripper
At 81% legit, Kerry loses even if all of the ballots go for him. He gets 124,203 move votes; Bush's initial margin is 136,000 votes. Bush ends up ahead by 11,797 votes even if Kerry gets all of the provisional votes. What do you want to bet Kerry's people did very similar math before he conceded.

They definitely did! It was discussed in Ryan Lizza's piece in the New Republic (posted on FR) a couple of days after the election. Lizza said that Kerry's staffers stayed up until 4am trying to figure out how to challenge the election results. They got precinct info from all their operatives in Ohio and realized that they just didn't have the votes. At this point Kerry made the decision to concede.

44 posted on 11/17/2004 1:50:51 PM PST by luv2ski
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: AuntB

Ohio has had provisional balloting for many years. It is NOT new for us. 87% of all provisionals were deemed valid in 2000. 81% validity this year would not be surprising at all.


45 posted on 11/17/2004 2:34:09 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

....which is why you can only file provisional ballots in the correct precinct in Ohio. If you vote in the wrong precinct, your ballot is simply discarded. Blackwell won that fight before the election.


46 posted on 11/17/2004 2:35:52 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies]

To: traderrob6
..the spoiled ballots, why are they not figured in?

Uh... because they're Spoiled.

Spoiled ballots never were, never are and never will be counted, as they can't be - because they're ... uh.. spoiled.

(not trying to be a smart a__)

47 posted on 11/17/2004 3:05:07 PM PST by Condor51 (May God have mercy upon my enemies, because I won't. - Gen G Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: Condor51

I have seen discussions both here and "ANOTHER SITE" of the spoiled ballots being counted. Anyone have any hard facts on that?


48 posted on 11/17/2004 5:01:28 PM PST by SoftballMominVA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 47 | View Replies]

To: mjwise

Any word on Franklin County's provisional count?


49 posted on 11/17/2004 5:19:50 PM PST by Columbus Dawg (Buckeye Country is Bush Country)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: My2Cents
I'd read that John Fund reported last week that half of Ohio's provisional ballots had been thrown out at illegal. Either he, or this report, are wrong.

I heard John Fund say the same thing.
That's why I was surprised by this report.

50 posted on 11/17/2004 6:37:07 PM PST by Jorge
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: mjwise

Aren't the dims in Ohio filing suit to challenge the way that provisionals are considered to be legit?


51 posted on 11/18/2004 8:28:12 AM PST by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

They are, but I don't expect anything to come from it. It's a grasping at straws maneuver as I see it.


52 posted on 11/18/2004 5:44:56 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]

To: Columbus Dawg

Sorry, haven't heard any Columbus news. I'm from Toledo -- over half of the provisionals were found to be invalid.


53 posted on 11/18/2004 5:48:00 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies]

To: AxelPaulsenJr

2nd reply -- also, trying to change the provisional validating rules now could potentially be disastrous for an ontime count especially in urban counties if they have to try to revalidate them for some reason.


54 posted on 11/18/2004 5:51:53 PM PST by mjwise
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 51 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-54 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson