Posted on 11/23/2004 8:35:11 PM PST by Southack
The Democrats are sick. Just sick.
Apparently, when Congress contemplated the fee-shifting bill three decades ago, it never conceived that 42 U.S.C. §1988 would be used to secure fees in esoteric battles over the meaning of the establishment clause of the First Amendment.
The statute gives a court "discretion" to award attorneys' fees to the prevailing party in civil rights cases.
Study of the legislative history of the statute reveals that Congress intended this statute to apply to civil rights abuses, including certain race and sex discrimination cases, but not to arguments about whether Judge Roy Moore is allowed to display the Ten Commandments in the Alabama courthouse.
During the deliberations on the bill, the Senate penned that "in many cases arising under our civil rights laws, the citizen who must sue to enforce the law has little or no money with which to hire a lawyer."[6] In the recent First Amendment lawsuits filed by the ACLU, the tables are turned. Small school districts and municipalities can either defend lawsuits and risk paying the ACLU's attorneys' fees if they lose, or they can voluntarily submit to the ACLU's view of the Constitution.
Even if lawsuits over the establishment clause somehow fall within 42 U.S.C. §1988, the statute empowers courts with nothing more than "discretion" to award fees.
In these cases, one would expect courts to withhold awarding fees. Since this is not happening, Congress must take immediate action to clarify 42 U.S.C. §1988 to explicitly exclude lawsuits related to the acknowledgement of God.
Does it involve lining them up and sending them one by one through the gautlet where they will be struck senseless by one thousand feather duster bearing democrats. Somehow I didn't think so, as the Christmas song says, "making a list, and checking it twice". It is pretty obvious who is naughty, and who is nice.
Question: do the words civil liberies, appear anywhere in the Constitution of the United States of America?
Question: do lawyers for the aclu take an oath to do their duty to God and their country?
Question: Is the aclu a money making proposition at taxpayer expense?
Question: What is the relationship between sharks, pond scum, and the aclu?
Thanks for the info. Someone on TV (Fox, I think ) said the ACLU has an annual budget of $40 million. This should keep them from being considered "with little or no money." Seems like they need some attention.
What about 'gay' aka sodomite scout masters?
At this time, there are no Boy Sodomizing Scout Masters, at least none that are open about it. Should the ACLU's minions of Anti Christ Pro Homo attorneys succeed, it'll mean the end of the Boy Scouts. If none other than token efforts are utilized to keep them at bay, it'll mean the eventual end of the Boy Scouts, or at least never ending harrasment. It's all about gay activism. Gay marriage, Gay TV programs, Gay indoctrinazation programs in our elementary, middle & high schools, and the Universities....
Follow the facts and at every event you'll run straight into gay attorneys - and judges - making it all possible.
Are you referring, by chance, to the Atheist Communist Lesbian Union?
What if the President designated it a national historic landmark instead? Would it be protected then?
If a court ordered it taken down anyway, then the logical next step would be to condemn the Old North Church in Boston, e.g., and order the land put up for auction.
Ditto the National Cathedral in Washington, where President Bush gave his great address after the 9/11 attacks.
Happy holidays, junkie.
That's exactly what this is all about.
Next up: Court orders to parents to stand aside, when pederasts start trying to hit on, entice, and entrap their sons.
After all, homosexuals must be allowed to replenish their ranks, just like "breeders"......okay, not "just like", but you know, "whatever works". Hey, hey, it's the Liberal Way.
Git chyer Mahnd Raht, Luke!
They'll never have the problem the GSUSA, with leadership cadres that in some communities are loading up with lesbians.
I recently was involved in a community activity near my home in which a number of Girl Scouts showed up. They didn't have on the usual GSUSA outfits (these were girls in their mid-teens), and so I asked their lead Scouter what part of GSUSA they represented, and she replied that they weren't GSUSA but BSA -- they were Venture Scouts (formerly Explorer Scouts) and that all-girl troops had been chartering in Venture Scouts for several years now. Imagine my surprise, and imagine my good guess at why girls are migrating from GSUSA programs over to Venture Scouts, as the Scouter told me they were. I asked her why, and she told me a couple of generalisms about "better programs".
Uyup, I bet.
I know all about the Venture program. Not only is it an excellent alternative to Girl Scouting, but it keeps the older Boy Scouts interested in the BSA program of earning merit badges and working towards Eagle Scout rank.
This one almose got away.(everyone busy for the holiday)
Messages sent to both Seantors. Mark (I'm gettin out of town) Dayton will ignore it, Norm Coleman will support it.
My Blue-state, la-la-land, leftist representative, MS. Betty (no communist policy I won't support) McCollum doesn't even have e-mail.
|
"Islam isn't in America to be equal to any other faiths, but to become dominant. The Koran, the Muslim book of scripture, should be the highest authority in America, and Islam the only accepted religion on Earth." -Omar Ahmad, Co-founder of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, aka CAIR President and CEO of Silicon Expert Technologies A Palestinian who grew up in a refugee camp in Jordan. |
||
ANTI-Cair -- Little Green Footballs -- JIHAD Watch -- DHIMMI Watch -- internet haganáh -- FaithFreedom -- Answering Islam |
bump
BUMP for choosing the RIGHT battles.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.