Funny how this outfit isn't interested in publishing the much longer list of deaths from pregnancy complications in women who decided to try to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.
My guess is that the reason they don't talk about deaths from mothers who carry their pregnancy to term is because they are an anti-abortion group. That thought took all of 1/100000000th of my brainpower. APf
"Try to carry". Well, in most cases you really don't have to do anything but not abort the baby, no "trying" to it. "carry an unwanted pregnancy to term." In plain english, thats called letting the baby live.
As far as risks to the mothers health, I don't know the mortaility rate to the mother from RU-486 induced abortions compared to mortality rates due to full term births. I do know that the mortality rates of the babies is in the high 90% range for most abortion methods. Put that in your bong and smoke it for a while.
"Funny how this outfit isn't interested in publishing the much longer list of deaths from pregnancy complications in women who decided to try to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term."
That is just a ridiculous statement. There would be NO difference in pregnancy complications from wanted/unwanted pregnancies.
If you are trying to bring in "life/health of the mother" issues here you need to sharpen your science. Most of those women wouldn't be taking RU486 in any event, I'm sure it is only indicated for healthy people. I doubt even the pro-aborts at the FDA approve of instigating a medical crises (miscarriage) in the already unhealthy.
Because it doesn't advance their agenda. The fact is every drug out there has adverse effects on a percentage of people who take it. If this were the litmus test, we'd have no drugs on the market. This is just more anti-abortion stuff that won't work.
Funny how this outfit isn't interested in publishing the much longer list of deaths from pregnancy complications in women who decided to try to carry an unwanted pregnancy to term.>>
Ha, ha, Funny how you never provided a list.