Posted on 11/27/2004 12:42:07 PM PST by neverdem
MURDERER, who was on someone else's land!
You're far braver than I am then....loaded gun and I ask you nicely to leave, not sit there screaming taunts.
I asked this in another thread and don't think it was answered by you hunters out there.
How many rounds on average does a hunter take with him/her into the woods?
I asked the hunters in my family and the answer was 3-5 rounds. This guy shot 20 rounds and said he tossed the rest into a swamp. Is 20+ rounds excessive?
Is the accused a recent convert to Islam?
I haven't heard, but all these third worlders are the same in my book. Islam will eventually act as the rallying point for all the 'disenfranchised'.
Wonder what culture is represented by shooting people in the back?
--the one John Kerry is from. He can shoot an enemy in the back, but a Marine in Fallujah needs to be more careful.
What I'm curious about is why none of the hunters tried to shoot the murdering SOB......if I were hunting and anyone tried shooting my buddies, he would be a dead man! Sorry, better to be tried by 12 than carried by six!
I think one did shoot back, the only one with a gun, and he was shot first.
It's usually enough to fill the weapon's magazine, plus one round in the chamber, about 5 - 8 rounds, depending on state hunting regulations and the magazine capacity. I could see someone carrying a whole box of cartridges, 20 rifle rounds usually, so that the box is there at the end of the day when the weapon is unloaded.
So more than 20 would be excessive? I wonder how many rounds he threw away.
The truth lies somewhere between the stories from both sides. It was a sad day indeed. Lord, I hope the gun control crazies stay out of the fray.
Well, I'm glad to hear somebody tried to get him! Seems like you better be taking a fully loaded concealed handgun out in the deer woods, along with your rifle!
I read on another thread that Vang was trespassing on this same property last year, and the year before. Frankly, if someone trespassed on my hunting land 3 years in a row, I would most likely use a whole bunch of descriptive language directed at him, his heritage, and his intimate relationships with dead farm animals. (Hmong other things)
-----
Oh, come on, you selfish meanie. The poor, victimized man just wanted a place to hunt!!! He can't afford to buy land in this mean-spirited, capitalistic country. :)
What I'm curious about is why none of the hunters tried to shoot the murdering SOB
------
They were unarmed, from the accounts I heard. Only one had a gun.
Being in familiar territory while being somewhat experienced and with no weather changes forecast for days and not in a camp setting would make 20 plus rounds more than needed but, in my run on humble opinion, subject to whatever burden you are willing to carry.
I am just curious as to how many rounds he tossed and why.
They should be separated by whole worlds, and if not for liberal experiments in social engineering they would be.
Well. . .It's subject to what objective he really had, don't you think?
Not really. My first rule is no trespasser shall retain posession of a firearm, period. The trespasser can claim his weapon from the Sheriff upon providing proof of ownership.
Very true --- imagine if everyone of Polish descent was entitled to shoot and kill a half dozen people every time they were called "pollacks" or whites could kill every time they were called "gringos" or "anglos" or "honkies". This is the height of political correctness ---- to try to justify cold blooded murder because evil Americans aren't welcoming other cultures.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.