Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Drive-By Lawsuits
Investor's Business Daily ^ | November 30, 2004 | Masthead Editorial

Posted on 11/30/2004 11:08:49 AM PST by neverdem

Crime Prevention: Unable to repeal the right to bear arms, gun control advocates have tried to repeal the right to sell them, on the theory that if we disarm potential victims, gun violence would end.

In yet another victory for the concept of individual responsibility for one's actions and just plain common sense, the Illinois Supreme Court has unanimously rejected a lawsuit by the city of Chicago against 18 gun manufacturers, four distributors and 11 dealers. The city asserted that the firearms industry has created a "public nuisance," and asked for $433 million for health care and emergency services expenses.

The notion of individual responsibility for one's actions is completely foreign to those who support these lawsuits, which make about as much sense as suing Ford, GM, Chrysler or your local car dealer for providing the cars used in drive-by shootings.

These lawsuits are based on the bogus theory that gun manufacturers and dealers selling a legal product that functions as intended and is not defective should refrain from selling "too many" of them and "should know" what the purchasers intent is. They also argue that when some wind up in the wrong hands, it constitutes the creation of a "public nuisance."

Those filing such lawsuits hope one day to find an activist judge who shares their fantasies. Failing that, the hope is to impose legal costs that will bankrupt gun makers, gun dealers or both.

Gun-control advocates are free to file more such lawsuits elsewhere, which is why passage by Congress of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is necessary.

While 28 such lawsuits have been defeated in other states, including Louisiana, Connecticut, Florida, New Jersey, Georgia and Pennsylvania, similar cases are pending in Ohio, New York and Indiana. Since the first such lawsuit was filed, 33...

(Excerpt) Read more at investors.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Constitution/Conservatism; Crime/Corruption; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: District of Columbia; US: Illinois
KEYWORDS: banglist; guncontrol; gunprohibition; lawsuits; secondamendment

1 posted on 11/30/2004 11:08:49 AM PST by neverdem
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: neverdem

I'm going to sue these gun-control freaks for the potential of potentially bringing harm to my family.


2 posted on 11/30/2004 11:12:42 AM PST by kx9088
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Comment #3 Removed by Moderator

To: neverdem
Gun-control advocates are free to file more such lawsuits elsewhere, which is why passage by Congress of the Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act is necessary.

Republican President, Republican House, Republican Senate and no excuses.

4 posted on 11/30/2004 12:37:37 PM PST by Imal (Whatever kills you doesn't make you stronger.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Imal
Republican President, Republican House, Republican Senate and no excuses.

I guess nobody told you about Senate dems and the filibuster as well as congress critters called RINOs. The House passed it the last time with a 2/3 margin IIRC. The Senate is the nut to crack where they amended it to death last March.

5 posted on 11/30/2004 2:02:42 PM PST by neverdem (May you be in heaven a half hour before the devil knows that you're dead.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson