Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Why professors are liberal: They're intelligent
San Diego Union ^ | December 3, 2004 | Various

Posted on 12/03/2004 12:55:13 PM PST by Ramonan

In his column, "Campuses remain Democratic havens," George Will certainly tries hard to explain why faculty members at our prominent universities are overwhelmingly liberal. But as is often the case with Will, he fails to mention the obvious. These people are liberal because they are intelligent, thoughtful and well-educated. They know something of labor and social history and realize that for most people a return to conditions of the early 20th century would not be in their interest. Finally, they are unpersuaded by slogans like "compassionate conservative" and "ownership society," which are primarily a cover for the transfer of society's wealth into the pockets of the rich.

THOMAS ALDEN Borrego Springs

Demonstrating once again that you can be articulate, educated, powerful and connected yet still have no clue to what is actually going on, Will bemoans the lack of "conservative" thought on college campuses. The first thing that comes to my mind is thank God. If most professors' ideological rudders represented those of the current Republican Party, institutions of higher learning would be teaching creationism as the explanation of man's existence on Earth, ignoring more than a century of anthropological discoveries because they conflicted with biblical teachings. Government studies would renounce labor unions as pseudocommunist fronts, since businesses always do what is best for workers. Law schools would concern themselves primarily with property law, since only owners of property have rights.

CLIFF HANNA San Diego

(Excerpt) Read more at signonsandiego.com ...


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Foreign Affairs; Government; Philosophy; Political Humor/Cartoons; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: academia; bias; clueless; college; education; elites; faculty; georgewill; liberalism; msm; university
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-290 next last
To: Ramonan

Just thought I'd add that raw intelligence has nothing to do with it. Hitler was said to be highly intelligent. I'm sure Karl Marx or Joseph Stalin weren't mental dullards either. Raw brainpower and wisdom are completely independent concepts.


141 posted on 12/03/2004 1:53:09 PM PST by SpaceBar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: pikachu
"The F had been corrected by her dad to an A. Needless to say the young lady graduated with honors and a 4.0 GPA."

I'm calling BS on your story. What university was this? And why didn't you raise h*ll about this?

142 posted on 12/03/2004 1:54:01 PM PST by Truthsayer20
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: pikachu

Subtle way to remind us that those who choose to teach at that level are not the most moral upright citizens. yes, I've noticed that.


143 posted on 12/03/2004 1:54:15 PM PST by Publius6961 (The most abundant things in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 50 | View Replies]

To: lt.america
Had an "intelligent" liberal professor banging his shoe on his desk

Him?


144 posted on 12/03/2004 1:55:15 PM PST by Revolting cat! ("In the end, nothing explains anything!")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan

Should this not have been tabbed with a barf-alert?


145 posted on 12/03/2004 1:56:59 PM PST by Mach9 (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: macbee

Plus, it's probably a good bet that univerity profs earned their doctorates spewing Skinnerian behaviorism in psychology, or Keynesian theory in econ, or Darwinism in the bio-sciences. Adherence to "orthodoxy" has much to do with the fact that their degrees and careers have been based upon it. Question the Skinner school of behavior, etc., and you're questioning the validity and basis of their professional standing.


146 posted on 12/03/2004 1:57:35 PM PST by My2Cents ("Well...there you go again.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 137 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan

because they're usually tenured and in a union or both.

There's no way to can their candy asses no matter how
stupid, incapable or arrogant they are.


147 posted on 12/03/2004 1:58:09 PM PST by Rakkasan1 (Justice of the Piece: Hope IS on the way...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: lt.america
I had a sociology professor (under the guise of teaching a communication course) going ballastic over a dialogue I was having with some moron liberal over Locke's blank slate a.k.a. tabula rasa HYPOTHESIS, which they were preaching as law. I was arguing for an open mind to SOME heridity allowances in a human's mind development and tendancies; or that we might be dealing with BOTH nurture and nature.

The idiot liberal student just blurted "YOUR POINT IS MOOT!" and felt that was the end of it. No real need to substantiate or define his position. The instructor was behind him all the way. What a joke. I have learned much more in life from my own personal studies.

148 posted on 12/03/2004 2:01:35 PM PST by 101st-Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 121 | View Replies]

To: 101st-Eagle

Oops I meant 'heredity'


149 posted on 12/03/2004 2:02:53 PM PST by 101st-Eagle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 148 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan

The author is only partly right. We CONSERVATIVE professors are intelligent and thoughtful. The rest are slugs.


150 posted on 12/03/2004 2:03:23 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Brad Cloven

I represent that remark. I could say, those who can't teach, post.


151 posted on 12/03/2004 2:04:17 PM PST by LS
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: go star go

"The mistake these people make is to state that this professors are intelligent. They're not. If they were intelligent they would be out in the world applying they're knowledge and making a lot of money. The old saying holds true. Those that can... Do. Those that can't... Teach. So the whole idea that professors are intelligent is fiction."

So you equate someone's intelligence directly to the size of their wallet? Ridiculous. I guess all those poor Jesuit Priests teaching out there are stupid. Yah that makes sense.


152 posted on 12/03/2004 2:04:58 PM PST by strider44
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan
"transfer of society's wealth into the pockets of the rich. "

Huh? TRANSFER? How so? They make it sound like rich people get rich by STEALING.

153 posted on 12/03/2004 2:04:59 PM PST by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan

Don't mistake being an intellectual from being intelligent.

Usually it is insecure types who insist on unions and tenure to maintain their esteemed status in society. Truly competent people don't go around insisting people call them "Doctor" -- or "Reverend."

In Hawaii, teachers usually give their students extra credit for writing letters to the editor telling the public that teachers should get more pay and are deserving of the "most intelligent" designation. The newspapers eat them up like candy -- so impressed are they with their insight and innocence.

Everybody should be so naive.


154 posted on 12/03/2004 2:06:24 PM PST by MikeHu
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan
Remembering all the time that teachers/professors have the lowest ACT/SAT scores of any professional occupation . . .
155 posted on 12/03/2004 2:06:50 PM PST by Timmy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan

Alas! Professors are the products of their education.


156 posted on 12/03/2004 2:07:03 PM PST by Paperdoll
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: onyx

"Oh, no! San Diego!" ping.


157 posted on 12/03/2004 2:07:57 PM PST by bourbon (nut up and do your duty!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan
The Economist has weighed in on this topic as well:

America's one-party state

Dec 2nd 2004
From The Economist print edition

If you loathe political debate, join the faculty of an American university

TOM WOLFE'S new novel about a young student, “I am Charlotte Simmons”, is a depressing read for any parent. Four years at an Ivy League university costs as much as a house in parts of the heartland—about $120,000 for tuition alone. But what do you get for your money? A ticket to “Animal House”.

In Mr Wolfe's fictional university the pleasures of the body take absolute precedence over the life of the mind. Students “hook up” (ie, sleep around) with indiscriminate zeal. Brainless jocks rule the roost, while impoverished nerds are reduced to ghost-writing their essays for them. The university administration is utterly indifferent to anything except the dogmas of political correctness (men and women are forced to share the same bathrooms in the name of gender equality). The Bacchanalia takes place to the soundtrack of hate-fuelled gangsta rap.

Mr Wolfe clearly exaggerates for effect (that's kinda, like, what satirists do, as one of his students might have explained). But on one subject he is guilty of understatement: diversity. He fires off a few predictable arrows at “diversoids”—students who are chosen on the basis of their race or gender. But he fails to expose the full absurdity of the diversity industry...

[Click link above to read the full article]

158 posted on 12/03/2004 2:08:56 PM PST by macbee ("Never interrupt your enemy when he is making a mistake." - Napoleon Bonaparte)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: DennisR
Technically he is sort of right.

From dictionary.com

Usage Note: Transpire has been used since the mid-18th century in the sense “leak out, become publicly known,” as in Despite efforts to hush the matter up, it soon transpired that the colonels had met with the rebel leaders. This usage has long been standard. The more common use of transpire to mean “occur” or “happen” has had a more troubled history. Though it dates at least to the beginning of the 19th century, language critics have condemned it for more than 100 years as both pretentious and unetymological. There is some sign that resistance to this sense of transpire is abating, however. In a 1969 survey the usage was acceptable to only 38 percent of the Usage Panel; nearly 20 years later, 58 percent accepted it in the sentence All of these events transpired after last week's announcement. Still, many Panelists who accepted the usage also remarked that it was pretentious or pompous.

159 posted on 12/03/2004 2:10:24 PM PST by VaBarrister
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: Ramonan

Intelligent - Ha! Yes, the engineering professors at MIT and Carnegie Mellon are smart, many lib art profs are over-educated sophists who could afford (through trust funds or AA) to get their PHD.

Otherwise, I can't label anyone who paid a total of $500,000 (after interest on loans) to make 50g a year intelligent.


160 posted on 12/03/2004 2:11:09 PM PST by Conservomax (There are no solutions, only trade-offs.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 121-140141-160161-180 ... 281-290 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson