If there is this grand consensus among scientists, then why has the National Academy of Sciences been unable to pass resolutions saying so?
It has always appeared to me that this issue has been one of Goebbels-esque posturing rather than true facts. All of its supporters are basically fanatics, and their central argument consists primarily of reiterating the same phrases with little of no data to actually back it up. This is the only logical explanation why the global warmers get so hot under the collar when people ask the tough questions. A normal, rational person would try and counter with facts, one would think.
Like I said, I have yet to hear from any serious body of scientists, national or international, that has come to a majority conclusion on this matter. Maybe I'm wrong, but as I recall this didn't happen last conference at NAS.
It would probably be more accurate to state that
"A Grand concensus among scientists, who receive their salaries from organizations funded by Global Warming grants, agree that global warming is a real danger."