Wanted: Israeli neocons

Jerusalem Post ^ | 12-16-04 | CAROLINE GLICK

[PiersGaveston]

Newbies who show up and spout liberal crap are easily spotted.

Was that in your capacity of Archbishop of Titipu, First Commissioner of Police, or Lord Chief Justice?

Where did I say anything which is 'liberal'? (I'm asuming American usage here, rather than English - at times in English terms I am a liberal, but never in American terms.)

[Darksheare]

Why don't you answer the question instead of side-stepping it?
Do you think it is okay for the so-called Palestinains to blow themselves up in pizza parlors full of teenage Israeli GIRLS?

[Darksheare]

I also noticed that he's now trying darn hard not to say anything taht would out him for what he really is.
I predict that should he be banned, we'll have someone run across a blog whining about how he was banned and how mean we were to him.

[Darksheare]

"Where did I say anything which is 'liberal'?"

Basically in your statements taht preclude Israel having a right to self defense.

[PiersGaveston]

Why don't you answer the question instead of side-stepping it?

I thought that I had provided a pretty unequivocal answer.

Do you think it is okay for the so-called Palestinains to blow themselves up in pizza parlors full of teenage Israeli GIRLS?

No no no no no no no, not under any circumstances. It is terrorism, terrorism is evil, therefore it is evil.

It that enough. If it is not, please tell me what is enough to convince you that I despise all forms of terrorism, and consider Islamist suicide-bombing to be one of the most nefarious forms of terrorism yet invented.

[Darksheare]

"I thought that I had provided a pretty unequivocal answer."

Not after your denunciations of supposedly bulldozing 'straight through' a refuge camp, and claiming that it's Israel being the aggressor.

[PiersGaveston]

I also noticed that he's now trying darn hard not to say anything taht would out him for what he really is.

What is this mysterious thing that I really am, but am trying hard to hide?

I am not an anti-semite. I do not sit up all night reading the Protocols of the Elders of Zion nor to I believe them to be anything other than a grotesque slanderous forgery.

I despise all forms of terrorism, perhaps most especially suicide-bombing.

I predict that should he be banned, we'll have someone run across a blog whining about how he was banned and how mean we were to him.

You may not like me (which is fine, I couldn't care less whether a fruity-loop such as yourself likes me or not) but at least give me the decency of not being categorised along with those boring sods who come back and post long queenie-fit vanities.

The truth is that you have little idea who I really am, though the answer is very easy to find (and hint hin, it has nothing to do with anti-semitism which I despise along with all other forms of racism).

[PiersGaveston]

Do you support the driving of bull-dozers indiscriminately through refugee camps, and the consequent destruction of innocent human life?

I oppose that, I oppose suicide bombers.

Any more questions?

[Darksheare]

" (and hint hin, it has nothing to do with anti-semitism which I despise along with all other forms of racism)."

Hint hin: You're a troll, and you're tuna trawling/cherry picking for quotes.

[Darksheare]

Tell me where a bull dozer drove THROUGH a refuge camp?

[PiersGaveston]

Now who's sidestepping the question?

I have condemned in clear an unequivocal language terrorism, and the killing of innocents. Do you do the same?

[PiersGaveston]

You're a troll, and you're tuna trawling/cherry picking for quotes.

Wrong.

You don't get the prize. Unless, of course, you up your game-playing level.

[Darksheare]

Tell me WHERE the bulldozer "drove THROUGH" the refuge camp.
Is it so hard to back up your staement on that?

[Darksheare]

Oh, you're here to play a game.
So yes, I am correct about you.

[PiersGaveston]

Oh, you're here to play a game.
So yes, I am correct about you.

Not really, but I see no reason not to have some fun. So you're still wrong.

And silly me for thinking that the answer was quite so obvious.

[PiersGaveston]

Am I to read into this that you support killing innocents. You read that into my posts which clearly and vehemently denounced such killings, you utterly avoid the question.

Yet again, do you support the killing of innocents?

[Darksheare]

Uhh, yeah, the answer IS obvious: You really ARE a troll.

[Darksheare]

You support the terror bombings, and have since backpedaled.
When challeneged to prove a bulldozer drove THROUGH a refuge camp, you blovate and sidestep.

The S'Barro pizzaria was the one who got bombed by the way.
It was full of teenage girls.

Now, answer the question about where the bulldozer drove THROUGH the refuge camp, and prove there were deaths caused by it.

[Alouette]

Do you support the driving of bull-dozers indiscriminately through refugee camps, and the consequent destruction of innocent human life?

Nobody is doing that.

I oppose that, I oppose suicide bombers.

How nice and balanced. You oppose something that nobody has done with the same vehemence that you oppose a crime that has been committed frequently and is heartily endorsed by your dear oppressed Islamofascist palenazis.

[PiersGaveston]

You really ARE a troll.

Golly no, what a ghastly thought. That would place me alongside all of the drugg-ridden hippies who float from DUmmyunderground, and post anti-Bush crap. Yikes, wouldn't want to be associated with such grotesque lefties.

Maybe I'm merely a figment of your imagination, which becomes terribly interesting when I look at your bio-page, and you suggest that you are the figment of my imagination. This could get us into a rather difficult spiral; if you are imagining me, imagining you, imaginging me &c. then ultimately who is imagining and who is real?

Are you SURE that you really wanna think about me?

Not sure, but then if I am a figment of your imagination then I am not free to think, or not think about you.