[Durus]

Are you suggesting that the primary reason to have children is that you will have someone to take care of you when you grow old?

Speaking of selfish motivations.

[1Old Pro]

Are you suggesting that the primary reason to have children is that you will have someone to take care of you when you grow old? Speaking of selfish motivations.

yEP, i READ INTO THAT AS WELL.

[Slyfox]

Are you suggesting that the primary reason to have children is that you will have someone to take care of you when you grow old?

No, I just found it sad that after their husbands died they had no one close to take care of them.

[Mase]

"Are you suggesting that the primary reason to have children is that you will have someone to take care of you when you grow old?

Speaking of selfish motivations."

_________________________________________

Until recently that is how most American families survived. You had lots of children and it was their responsibility to take care of the parents when they got old. This was before 401k's, IRA's and other retirement plans but for much of American history, children served as the parents social security. This was especially common with farming families.

The fact that we do not do this to the same degree today is a sad commentary on our society. Throughout Asia this is still the practice with three or more generations of family living together. I have been asked by many Asians about the American penchant for sending elderly parents to nursing homes for others to take care of them. They just don't understand how we could do that to our parents. I see far too many people here who look at their parents as a burden in old age and refuse to offer much assistance to them.

[silverleaf]

My children may not give a rat's ass about me when I am old ... but I will love them! That is why I decided to raise children. No better use of my life, imho.