Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Leak of reactor coolant (Michigan Power Plant)
Michigan.gov ^

Posted on 01/24/2005 9:35:25 PM PST by ConservativeMan55

FLASH: Fermi 2 nuclear power plant in Michigan is shut down... 'We have a leak of reactor coolant into the containment structure... leak rate was about 75 gallons a minute but is reducing,' John Austerberry, spokesman... 'there is no indication of a radioactive release'... MORE...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; News/Current Events; US: Michigan
KEYWORDS: fermiii; leak; plant; power; radioactive
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last
To: COEXERJ145; Physicist
If it is reactor coolant, yes.

I used to sit on the edge of a uranuim bathtub reactor with nothing but water between me and the core. We used to turn all the lights out in the reactor room and crank the reactor up to 600 megawatts. The blue glow from the Cerenkov radiation was beautiful. It is pretty cool watching the core glow blue with your own eyes. :-)

101 posted on 01/26/2005 2:53:17 PM PST by RadioAstronomer
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

My boo-boo---I'm used to PWR's.


How do they handle the radioactivity in the BWR after it goes through the turbine and into the condensate system?

Soundls like a lot of extra shielding and the like (but a lot less corrosion, though)

I still the problems they had with FERMI-1 when I was a kid.

Nice to see that FERMI-2 has a lot better record.


102 posted on 01/26/2005 2:58:29 PM PST by fastattacksailor (We interrupt your jihad to bring you a Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 100 | View Replies]

To: fastattacksailor

Lots of shielding. The trade off of a simple, component wise, system such as the BWR compared to a PWR with more components means that potentially more radiaoactive systems and areas exist with a BWR design as compared to a PWR. You need a lot more shielding with a BWR. Access to more areas require suiting up. With a PWR, water chemistry is super critical. Tube corrosion and eventual leaks in the steam generators require tube plugging or sleeving. Lots of tubes plugged means reduced power output. Some plants have been forced to replace steam generators which is a mammoth project since the plants weren't designed for steam generator replacement.

A BWR doesn't have steam generators but you have to monitor more areas and systems for radioactive leaks. You learn real quick not to wear anything made out of a polyester blend at a BWR site. Just walking across the turbine deck will cause you to pick up enough radioactivity to setoff the portal monitors. It's short half-life stuff which means you have to stand around and look stupid until the stuff decays.

Accessing the condensor bay in a PWR is simple. There's no radioactivity. At a BWR plant, it's a high rad area.


103 posted on 01/26/2005 3:18:18 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 102 | View Replies]

To: yer gonna put yer eye out

It's an artistic rendering combining symbols both American and Persian and is called United We Stand. (as in against the Iranian regime and for a free and democratic Iran)


104 posted on 01/26/2005 3:28:22 PM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies]

To: meatloaf

Like I said---I was around the PWR.

MANY thanks for the full explaination.

I remember the chemistry stuff and all the corrosion problems. I still remember the SG replacement project at Indian Point 2.

Even with all the extra tubing--give me less power and a PWR anytime. I like turbines--and being near them.

I wasn't a nuke myself--not even in submarines.
My background was conventional steamplants (civilian)

I always had a lot of fun going to the power stations (nuclear and fossil) with Dad (trained in PWR's---I'm am from a family of nukes.) A few cousins were involved in the construction of Shoreham (BWR!)---then it's dismantlement. Always thought that was a disgrace.


anyway---thanks again!

FAS


105 posted on 01/26/2005 3:35:05 PM PST by fastattacksailor (We interrupt your jihad to bring you a Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 103 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

"Maybe if you and others tried to understand that the roots of the alleged Bigotry come from the hearts of MANY people who have been adversely affected by the actions of the Islamofascists, and that they have a right to be angry at all Muslims, but it is all talk, they are not going to act on it."

Since Islamofascists are not ALL muslims, as you have rightly identified, I believe you've given the definition of bigotry.

As for free speech, I suppose your friends have informed you, that FR has posting rules and it is not a democracy.
If not, please go to the home page and check out the rules.


106 posted on 01/26/2005 3:59:00 PM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 84 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert
As for free speech, I suppose your friends have informed you, that FR has posting rules and it is not a democracy.

So you're saying that the 1st amendment is not applicable here? How about identifying the quotes you posted? (name of poster and where it's from).

From the guidlines: Please: NO profanity, NO personal attacks, NO racism or violence in posts.

I guess we need to define "Racism". Last I looked there were three main races, with subgroups for each: Caucasian, Negroid and Mongoloid. Saying something against Islam is not racist, it may be intolerant, but not racist.

I'll ask you what I asked CG: Do the jews have a right to be mad at all Germans for the Holocaust?

Do the Chinese have the right to be mad at all Japanese for the Rape of Nanking and other war crimes?

Do Americans that lost loved ones at Pearl Harbor have the right to hate the Japanese?

Do the Palestinians have the right to hate ALL jews for the actions of the Israelis? and so on...

107 posted on 01/26/2005 5:03:35 PM PST by Former Dodger (I thought ABORTION was murder and FUR was a Woman's right to choose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 106 | View Replies]

To: Former Dodger

If you have questions or don't like the rules, take it up with Jim.
Goodnight.


108 posted on 01/26/2005 5:05:53 PM PST by nuconvert (No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 107 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

Chemist Geek does not follow the rules---or do you only hold those that are not friends and family to said rules?

Do I sense a little discrimintaion here?


109 posted on 01/26/2005 5:13:23 PM PST by fastattacksailor (We interrupt your jihad to bring you a Crusade)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: nuconvert

If you don't like being questioned, don't make statements that breed questions.

Sleep tight.


110 posted on 01/26/2005 5:14:03 PM PST by Former Dodger (I thought ABORTION was murder and FUR was a Woman's right to choose.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 108 | View Replies]

To: fastattacksailor

Any time.


111 posted on 01/26/2005 6:54:58 PM PST by meatloaf
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 105 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 41-6061-8081-100101-111 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson