Your first link assumes a ridiculous simple model for the flood and then debunks it. I believe, that's called a strawman argument.
The video on the flood, did a good job of laying out both the evolutionist theory of grand canyon area being submerged under oceans several times. Then it presents the Creationist view. Does a good job of explaining how the differnent layers formed and points out that there is a general lack of erosion between layers which would be expected if the layers had occurred over millions of years.
As for your videos, I'm just chuckling to myself. What are you going to tell your kids when they finally learn the truth, and are exposed to all the lies in those cartoons?
Having gotten both sides of the issue, they'll be able to think for themselves. What are you going to do the day you realize that this fisherman and disciple of Jesus prophesized 2000 years ago about you?
1 Peter 3 Knowing this first, that there shall come in the last days scoffers, walking after their own lusts, 4 And saying, Where is the promise of his coming? for since the fathers fell asleep, all things continue as they were from the beginning of the creation. 5 For this they willingly are ignorant of, that by the word of God the heavens were of old, and the earth standing out of the water and in the water: 6 Whereby the world that then was, being overflowed with water, perished:
ROFLMAO.
The Grand Canyon sediments being laid down in a variety of oceans and seas, isn't an "evolutionist" theory, it's geology. Universally agreed on eoglogy by every sane geologist on the planet.
I don't believe there happen to be any in the Grand Canyon, but Angular Unconformities throw a monkey wrench of colossal proportions into silly "all sedimentary rock everywhere laid down by the Great Flood" theories.
Notice the word "willingly" in that passage? "Willingly ignorant..." Evolutionists stick their fingers in their ears when God claims to have created the world because they don't want to know that He did... Why IS that? Is it because they would have to acknowledge God's existence, and if they acknowledged God's existence, they might also have to acknowledge that He is responsible for their own existence, and if He is responsible for their existence, they might have to feel accountable to Him?
OK, flame away! I can take it!