Professor Resigns as Department Chair Amid Furor Over 9/11 Remarks

Isn't hate speech illegal?

More likely tThe reason they cancelled is a ton of people who donate to the school threatened to pull out their money.

Which is how Free Speech is supposed to work! Free speech counters free speech.

The 1st Amendment strikes again. The 1st Amendment is beautiful.

BTW, check out this psychopath's photo. He is about as much an American Indian as I am (and I am 1/32 Native American, for real).

He is a complete phony baloney charlatan and is a sad excuse for a human, much less insulting the Native American.

Yeah, I saw the photos - Right out of a 60's Bad Trip! I sincerely hope he gets the Horsewhipping he has worked so hard to earn and that he so richly deserves.

FYI URGENT CONTACT INFO.....CU REGENTS WANT YOUR INPUT ACCORDING TO THE CU DAILY PAPER:

Ward.Churchill@Colorado.EDU
Office: 303-492-8852

According to the story I read from the CU student newspaper, the REGENTS ARE WANTING PUBLIC INPUT...THEY ARE MEETING THURSDAY TO DECIDE CHURCHILL'S FATE! CONTACT THEM HERE:

Jerryrutledge@adelphia.net (the chair)
Tommyjclay@aol.com
Peter.Steinhauer@colorado.edu
Regent.Carlisle@colorado.edu
Regent.Hayes@colorado.edu
Carrigan@colorado.edu
Regent.Bosley@colorado.edu
Regent.Schauer@colorado.edu
Gail.Schwartz@colorado.edu

University of Colorado Dept. of Ethnic Studies:
Fax: 303-492-7799

"I have never said that people 'should' engage in armed attacks on the United States, but that such attacks are a natural and unavoidable consequence of unlawful U.S. policy. As Martin Luther King, quoting Robert F. Kennedy, said, 'Those who make peaceful change impossible make violent change inevitable.'"

Look you stupid idiot: When you say we are to blame for the attack, you may not be saying you support the terrorists. But, you can't talk about us as if we are guilty and actually expect people to support you. There is only a minor distinction, not a major difference between you supporting the terrorists and just saying we are partially to blame. After all, by saying we are partially to blame due to our policies, you are expressing sympathy for the terrorists and partially validating their actions.

I e-mailed him this.....I was much more tactful in my e-mail:

"Sir,

I am appalled by what you have said regarding 9/11.

I also read your statement on your site. I believe that every story has two sides.

However, when I read your response, it was less than convincing. Your word choice was very poor in your piece. And frankly, based on your previous writings, on marxism and the like, I wonder just how much sympathy you actually do give to the terrorists, contrary to your protestations.

There is no major difference, only a difference in slight distinction, between actually supporting the terrorists and giving their actions legitimacy by attacking the victims of their attacks and saying the policy of the United States brought the attacks on itself.

You do not seem to understand this. I have called your college and demanded you be fired immediately."