Skip to comments.
Gingrich to Pelosi: Change 'Outrageous' SOU Rebuttal
NewsMax ^
| 2/2/05
| Carl Limbacher
Posted on 02/02/2005 5:19:38 PM PST by wagglebee
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
To: wagglebee
"We all know that the United States cannot stay in Iraq indefinitely and continue to be viewed as an occupying force. Neither should we slip out the back door, falsely declaring victory but leaving chaos." Yep, she actually said, I listened to the rebuttal by Reid and Pelosi.
Now excuse me while I go de-louse.
To: Henchster
Pelosi even went as far as to tell the terrorists what we have left unguarded since 9/11.
42
posted on
02/02/2005 8:02:49 PM PST
by
Dog
To: WildTurkey
He was "politely" warning all of us to watch for it. He knew NP would never listen to what he said. she changed it from "Americans are an occupying army" to "we are seen as an occupying force"
To: wagglebee
Here's where she said that American troops have failed:
"Despite the best efforts of our troops and their Iraqi counterparts, Iraq still faces a violent and persistent insurgency, and the Chairman of the National Intelligence Council said in January that Iraq is now a magnet for international terrorists."
44
posted on
02/02/2005 9:01:42 PM PST
by
eyespysomething
(I'm speechless here, but don't worry, it won't last long. Ask my husband.)
To: wagglebee
Even California will be sick of her ass by the time she's been in office another term.
45
posted on
02/02/2005 10:22:30 PM PST
by
SunkenCiv
(Ted "Kids, I Sunk the Honey" Kennedy is just a drunk who's never held a job (or had to).)
To: wagglebee
When she came on the screen, I grabbed the remote. Even an old episode of "Law and Order" was preferable to watching the wide-eyed Ms. Pelosi.
46
posted on
02/02/2005 10:25:44 PM PST
by
.38sw
To: commonguymd
Although I have a theory; I fear this is all a Clinton effort. Let the left fracture the democrats and put Dean in charge of the DNC to continue building a party divide - opens up a slot for a 3rd party candidate (preferable strong on immigration methinks) to siphon enough votes for Hillary to get in. Thus, you get another Clinton in with less than 50%. One GIANT flaw in this theory is that if the 3rd party candidate is on the left, is robs a ton of votes from Hitlery.
To: AmericaUnited
The middle might go either way. You are right, a far left candidate may hurt her. I don't see that as the plan though. Just something to watch. She knows she could never get 50% in a straight up election. Her husband was gifted by a third party candidate.
48
posted on
02/03/2005 3:10:28 AM PST
by
commonguymd
(My impatience is far more advanced than any known technology.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-48 last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson