Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Wall St. Journal (Again) Hates Real ID Act

Posted on 02/19/2005 6:06:09 AM PST by ncphinsfan

Republicans swept to power in Congress 10 years ago championing state prerogatives, and one of their first acts was to repeal federal speed-limit requirements. Another was aimed at ending unfunded state mandates. So last week's House vote to require costly and intrusive federal standards for state drivers licenses is a measure of how far the party has strayed from these federalist principles.


TOPICS: Government
KEYWORDS: nationalid; realidact
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last
To: drt1

We don't want a national ID card.

"Papers pliss"

The old giving up liberty for security thing.


21 posted on 02/19/2005 7:08:18 AM PST by From many - one. (formerly e p1uribus unum)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy
"Keeping it easy for shady employers to keep hiring illegals, IMO"

Agree. That certainly is one reason. Another might be found in parochialism of some States re: Giving up a prerogative (A lousy reason IMO). Yet another might be a hesitancy to actually establish a basis for real, effective voter identification thereby limiting the 'Flexibility' of the parties (Wash State?) in conducting elections.

22 posted on 02/19/2005 7:11:40 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: dakine
"shaking my head.... "

Because you can't verbalize a response? You did know that the 9/11 hijackers had legal drivers' licenses just like they still would under this bill don't you?

23 posted on 02/19/2005 7:11:56 AM PST by bayourod ("It's for the children" has been replaced by "It's to fight terrorists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
It's just about protecting big labor unions from competition while appeasing the people who don't like Mexicans.

It's kind of tiring after a while trying to discuss this issue with you saying the same thing over and over and over again.

Are you aware of how many Hispanics are on this board speaking out against illegal immigration and the economic consequences as a result of it?

With you jumping to conclusions all the time about people's motives as you do maybe a more appropriate screename should be lightning rod because that's what you made yourself.

24 posted on 02/19/2005 7:17:01 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
It's just about protecting big labor unions from competition while appeasing the people who don't like Mexicans.

So my wife, who is a third-generation American citizen of Mexican ancestry, doesn't like Mexicans because she is opposed to illegal immigration.

That's really special, bayourod. She has to hate herself for your theory to be valid.

25 posted on 02/19/2005 7:18:56 AM PST by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"Are you aware of how many Hispanics are on this board speaking out against illegal immigration and the economic consequences as a result of it? "

No, how many? Name them.

26 posted on 02/19/2005 7:19:05 AM PST by bayourod ("It's for the children" has been replaced by "It's to fight terrorists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

There are quite a few though I'm not going to mention names or ping them. If you stopped to read the posts once in a while you'd know who they are.


27 posted on 02/19/2005 7:22:02 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: From many - one.; dirtboy; sergeantdave

How is a National ID any different than things now such as a Social Security Card, a Passport, credit card, birth certificate or any other of the host of ID currently used except that it would be more effective by establishing consistent standards? If you think a National ID reduces personal privacy just check a credit report sometime. What you fear is already a fact only the lack of standards in individual identification makes these outmoded methods susceptible to fraud and identity theft. IMO Current proposals might pave the way for closing some of these gaps.


28 posted on 02/19/2005 7:24:41 AM PST by drt1
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: bayourod

bayourod, for the umteenth time, it's ANTI-ILLEGAL IMMIGRANTS not ANTI-IMMIGRANTS. Can you not comprehend the concept of ILLEGAL?


29 posted on 02/19/2005 7:30:20 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies]

To: antisocial
Can you not comprehend the concept of ILLEGAL?

Since he's playing the race card, it isn't that he cannot comprehend the concept, it's that he doesn't WANT to acknowledge the concept.

30 posted on 02/19/2005 7:32:08 AM PST by dirtboy (Drooling moron since 1998...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

I do believe you're right.


31 posted on 02/19/2005 7:35:26 AM PST by antisocial (Texas SCV - Deo Vindice)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: bayourod
You did know that the 9/11 hijackers had legal drivers' licenses

Sorry, you're wrong.

Several of them obtained Virginia ID cards (not DLs) under false pretenses and by using phony documents. At the time, it was possible to have a third party attest that you were a resident of Virginia in order to get Virginia IDs, DLs, and learner's permits. No proof of residency or proof or presence in the U.S. was required.

Worse, the people who provided these documents were running a larger forged documents business in Virginia, and at least one of them was an illegal. IIRC two were convicted and one was deported.

The hijackers made their first phony documents connection at the Dar al Hijra mosque in Falls Church; who in turn escorted them to the 7-11 at Bailey's Crossroads where they met the broker; who then escorted the hijackers (on more than one occasion) to the DMV on Five Mile Run.

32 posted on 02/19/2005 7:55:22 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: drt1

A national ID is a mandatory imposition by the state into my affairs.

Social security is a ponzi scheme, refined robbery by the state.

Credit card info is a voluntary, contractual association between me and a business. I can end that at any time.

The first 10 amendments of the US consitution can be boiled down to three words: "Leave me alone!"

I didn't move into the bush, far, far away from idiot, intrusive government, to see some nitwit politician tell me that I need to carry an internal federal fascist passport.


33 posted on 02/19/2005 8:02:32 AM PST by sergeantdave (Smart growth is Marxist insects agitating for a collective hive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 28 | View Replies]

To: dirtboy

exactly...


34 posted on 02/19/2005 8:04:11 AM PST by dakine
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
"There are quite a few"

I haven't see any. There have been several who have married Mexicans. Give me some names if you claim there are so many.

35 posted on 02/19/2005 8:14:45 AM PST by bayourod ("It's for the children" has been replaced by "It's to fight terrorists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: bayourod; HiJinx
I haven't see any. There have been several who have married Mexicans. Give me some names if you claim there are so many.

HiJinx for one, not that I'm sure he wants to come to this thread and read your same old, same old...

36 posted on 02/19/2005 8:18:54 AM PST by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: ncjetsfan
WSJ editorial board has a few too many libertarians "rights" maniacs.
37 posted on 02/19/2005 8:21:08 AM PST by aculeus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest
Oh give me a break, this has nothing to do with federalist principles as far as the WSJ is concerned.

No doubt the WSJ has an agenda.

That does not negate the fact that a national ID tramples state powers and expands those of the fedgov.

38 posted on 02/19/2005 8:25:10 AM PST by NMC EXP (Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Reaganwuzthebest; HiJinx
"HiJinx for one"

He certainly doesn't appear to be you typical "Hispanic". From his profile page:

"Started out as AF brat, born in England, moved to Italy, then all around (California, Mississippi, Libya, Ohio, Arizona) till I joined the Army in '76. Entered in Phoenix, served at Ft. Meade, Ft. Riley, tours in Berlin and Augsburg, retired down here at Ft. Huachuca in Sierra Vista, and currently working for a defense contractor. Married to a wonderful Italian gal, "

39 posted on 02/19/2005 8:25:53 AM PST by bayourod ("It's for the children" has been replaced by "It's to fight terrorists.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: agitator

"Universal indentiers - they are not just for farm animals anymore."

Good one.

The state wants to keep track of its property - us.


40 posted on 02/19/2005 8:27:02 AM PST by NMC EXP (Choose one: [a] party [b] principle.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-90 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson