Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

John MacArthur on CNN's NewsNight with Aaron Brown (RESPONSE)
biblebb.com ^ | March 17, 2005 | N/A

Posted on 03/17/2005 8:19:35 PM PST by buckeyesrule

STATEMENT FROM GRACE TO YOU:

John MacArthur on CNN's NewsNight with Aaron Brown

On Wednesday, March 16, CNN interviewed John MacArthur about The Purpose-Driven Life for a special broadcast of NewsNight with Aaron Brown (Paula Zahn substituting). John agreed to the interview because we saw it as an opportunity to clarify some important gospel truths that have been obscured in all the publicity surrounding the book's popularity.

John's critical comments about the book were brief but substantive. He highlighted some significant points where the thrust of the book is at odds with the message of Scripture. He pointed out, for example, that the true gospel is a call to self-denial, not self-fulfillment. The gospel is a message about redemption, not about life's purpose. The gospel according to Scripture deals with God's law, His grace, human depravity, redemption from sin, justification, sanctification, holiness, the nature of saving faith, and the lordship of Christ. And the true gospel's most essential features are the cross of Christ and the truth of the resurrection. None of those subjects is dealt with adequately or biblically in The Purpose-Driven Life.

In their own post-production editing process, however, CNN removed virtually all the substantive comments from their interview with John MacArthur. A voice-over by the CNN reporter introduced John MacArthur as someone who "preaches the gospel of a stern God," while the subtext identified John as a "skeptic."

CNN also inserted some remarks from secular media experts who seemed to think petty jealousy is the only motive two pastors might possibly have for disagreeing with one another. They made numerical comparisons between Grace Community Church and Saddleback, accompanied by a comment from a local newspaper's religion writer who declared that the difference between Warren and MacArthur was merely a dispute over two different marketing methods.

All of this gave a spin to CNN's interview that utterly misrepresents our concerns about the Purpose-Driven phenomenon. John MacArthur's criticism of this approach is not new, and it is not motivated by anything personal. We have been pleading for a more biblical approach to church leadership and evangelistic ministry for many years. John MacArthur's 1993 book Ashamed of the Gospel sounded this very alarm two years before Rick Warren published his first book describing his philosophy of ministry.

So the concerns we have raised are biblical and substantive, and not merely personal criticisms of Rick Warren. We wish the CNN interview had made those facts clear. We have certainly tried our best to make them clear.

Phil Johnson


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Miscellaneous; US: California; US: Georgia
KEYWORDS: purposedrivenlife; rickwarren
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last
To: Nike Hercules

Sir, I suggest you read that Scripture more carefully.

The fruit of false teachers is FALSE TEACHING.

Warren has some incorrect teaching that the book then brings to the readers.

This is BAD fruit, not good fruit.


21 posted on 03/17/2005 10:52:05 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: mattdono; All

If you want a book that is solid theologically and Biblically about the purpose of life, read "Don't Waste Your Life" by John Piper.


22 posted on 03/17/2005 10:54:31 PM PST by rwfromkansas (http://www.xanga.com/home.aspx?user=rwfromkansas)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: rwfromkansas

His "Purpose Driven Church" dang near
ruined my home church.

PTL that it was recognized in time.


23 posted on 03/17/2005 11:18:31 PM PST by dixiechick2000 (President Bush is a mensch in cowboy boots.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: Rush fan
Redemption without purpose is purposeless.

Whose purpose is it? Mine or Christ's? I believe that it was the purpose of the Gospel to save people for eternal life. And that is the purpose for which Christ suffered, died and rose again.

24 posted on 03/17/2005 11:40:33 PM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I'm not saying he's not a better Bible scholar; though a prolific output is hardly evidence of sound scholarship. Nevertheless, in this case, the criticisms seem to be rather petty in the scheme of things, and I don't think it speaks well of him. It has somewhat of an appearance of opportunism to me, though I'm not saying that's his motive. Anyhow, there's enough utter garbage being published under the banner of Christian literature without going after a basically sound work because of a disagreement over emphasis.

Personally, as I've said, I have some real problems with some of the themes Warren emphasizes; however, they are difficulties not shared by everyone else who reads the book, and they needn't be. If someone is going to benefit from the overall thrust of the book, I'm not going to throw sand in the gears of their spiritual growth because of those issues. So far, I've found nothing in the book that would steer anyone in any direction other than salvation in Christ.

25 posted on 03/18/2005 12:02:35 AM PST by william clark
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

As I said before, to "His purpose".

Chewed gum is right in perspective here. The Gospel is the Good News of what Christ has done to redeem us to His purpose. Redemption without purpose is purposeless.

Point is, many Christians today are down-playing everything outside of soul-winning as unimportant and in doing so, clear themselves of the purpose for their life that God has for them.

I think the interesting question to Rick Warren or any Christian is, if Ashley Smith was not abducted by Brian Nichols, but had a choice, should she have chosen to risk her own safety to try to "reach" or persuad him. Most people would say no. i think God says yes- this is our purpose.


26 posted on 03/18/2005 12:13:30 AM PST by Rush fan (MacArthur's drying out the Gospel again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rush fan
Most people would say no. i think God says yes- this is our purpose.

God created us to serve Him. In our love for Him, it is His will that we tell others of His saving grace. If you want to call this purpose, that's fine. Romans 8:28, "And we know that in all things God works for the good of those who love him, who have been called according to his purpose."

27 posted on 03/18/2005 12:36:04 AM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: GarySpFc
I will go with MacArthur's theology any day over Warren's.

As will I, and I'm a Wesleyan/Arminian Classical Pentecostal. John MacArthur is top notch IMO.

28 posted on 03/18/2005 12:43:11 AM PST by streetpreacher (The fires of hell burn hot and try to destroy me, I run to your will Oh God I know you’ll restore me)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Rush fan

Good points.

Someday, when all of us God fearing Freepers are gathered at Christ's feet in heaven, He will explain all of scripture. All the "hard" parts will be made clear. I am sure that sometime in that talk, one of us will interrupt and say, "That's not quite right."


29 posted on 03/18/2005 3:17:19 AM PST by KeyWest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: what's up

Excellent book. Almost didn't read it because it hit me the wrong way at first, but I took my time and grew to appreciate it. I like Purpose Driven Church even more.

Warren might be accused of a type of soft evangelism, but I don't think there's a thing wrong with that. His methodology is to reach out to as many people as he can and try to draw them in. The only crime would be to deny truth appropriately.

Is it a perfectly comprehensive book? No. But it has plenty of good fruit, including the dramatic change in the Atlanta court killer.

Paul


30 posted on 03/18/2005 4:03:13 AM PST by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B

Just wanted to add that I think more harm than good is usually done by the kind of criticism that has been reported here. "The Gospel is about redemption, not life's purpose" is false dichotomy at its very worst. Life's purpose is redemption, and redemption's purpose is that we have "life more abundantly".

Christ told us that there is a place for ignoring the tares, for fear of destroying the wheat as well. Unfortunately the church continues to miss this important lesson. If MacCarther had merely added greater theological depth to the base that Warren had laid, I would applaud his actions. But at least as it's reported here, he went beyond that, into criticism. Biblical scholar, theological wiz, or not, that is very unfortunate. The kingdom of God is about far more than theological exactitude.


31 posted on 03/18/2005 4:10:09 AM PST by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B

Sorry, make that, "The only crime would be to deny truth INappropriately. "


32 posted on 03/18/2005 4:42:41 AM PST by Paul_B
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: buckeyesrule

I personally believe that Warren's book has brought many 10's of thousands MORE unbelievers to the

BIBLICAL POINTS OF DECISION, PROGRESS AND LIVED-OUT FAITH

than all of McArthur's sermons and books put together.


33 posted on 03/18/2005 4:49:28 AM PST by Quix (HAVING A FORM of GODLINESS but DENYING IT'S POWER. 2 TIM 3:5)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: buckeyesrule
I love John MacArthur. He has an excellent way of cutting through a lot of garbage. His books were very inmportant to me at a time when I was floundering.

Becki

34 posted on 03/18/2005 7:30:50 AM PST by Becki (If vegetarians eat vegetables, what do humanitarians eat???)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: taxesareforever

sorry to split hairs, but God did not create us foremost to serve Him. He created us foremost to glorify/love Him. If serving Him were the main reason, He could have made robots. and your Romans quote seemed out of left field to me. with love but this stuff's important.


35 posted on 03/18/2005 5:21:08 PM PST by Rush fan (MacArthur's drying out the Gospel again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Paul_B

Paul_B, you have spoken more clearly on this than anyone. Great!


36 posted on 03/18/2005 5:28:51 PM PST by Rush fan (MacArthur's drying out the Gospel again.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 31 | View Replies]

To: Rush fan
*****sorry to split hairs, but God did not create us foremost to serve Him. He created us foremost to glorify/love Him. If serving Him were the main reason, He could have made robots. and your Romans quote seemed out of left field to me. with love but this stuff's important.****

As George H W Bush once said in a debate....that was about as clear as the boston harbor. LOL! Just kidding!

37 posted on 03/18/2005 5:52:58 PM PST by buckeyesrule (God bless Condi Rice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: Becki

I love MAc Arthur too....I listen to his radio show every night. I'm reading thru the book Truth Matters!


38 posted on 03/18/2005 5:55:03 PM PST by buckeyesrule (God bless Condi Rice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies]

To: what's up
****What are Freeper opinions of Rick Warren and his book?****

I flipped thru the book at the bookstore once for about 10 minutes once. I had heard about the book and wanted to take a look at it. After reading thru it I could not help but wonder what the big deal was. It didn't strike a that much of an earth shattering book. It has lots of weird bible translations which struck ne as weird.

I geuss after reading Watchman Nee, J I Packer and MacArthur PDL just seemed kind of tame.

I think one initial reason for its success was that he's a southern baptist and southern baptist general love their own. As my sister says, "southern baptist are a breed unto themselves."

39 posted on 03/18/2005 6:00:27 PM PST by buckeyesrule (God bless Condi Rice!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Rush fan
He created us foremost to glorify/love Him. If serving Him were the main reason, He could have made robots. and your Romans quote seemed out of left field to me.

#1. Your first sentence answers what we were discussing. Sounds to me like a purpose. #2. God gave man from the beginning the knowledge of good and evil, therefore your robot is a non-issue. #3. My Romans quote was fitting but I guess you don't see "called according to his purpose" meaningful to this discussion. #4. Check out these verses and then tell me we are not called to serve Him: Exodus 7:16 John 12:26 Colossians 3:24 Hebrews 9:14 Even when we are in heaven we will serve him. Check out this verse: Revelations 7:15

40 posted on 03/19/2005 12:02:03 AM PST by taxesareforever
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-44 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson