Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

First Judge Showdown: Specter asks, "Can we agree to disagree?" Democrats say no.
National Review Online ^ | March 18, 2005 | Byron York

Posted on 03/18/2005 8:45:59 AM PST by xsysmgr

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: hchutch

I'm a PA voter and I just sent a letter to Sen. Specter. Here's hoping he'll listen.


21 posted on 03/18/2005 9:15:48 AM PST by zook
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: wrathof59

Arlen Specter chairing the judiciary committee is like bringing a pocket knife to a gunfight. When Specter got thru his rough patch right after the election and got his chaimanship, the democrats were assured the lay of the land. The time to go nuclear was over putting Specter in the chairmanship. That would have made the point to the democrats loud and clear.


22 posted on 03/18/2005 9:20:59 AM PST by blackdog (Lord of Woop Woop)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
But if Arlen Specter is the one who raises the "point of order" on the judicial nominations, that changes the whole ball game. Specter is seen as the maverick, the moderate, the person who tries to build the bridges. It is harder to attack him as the Nazi than it would be to attack Frist as the Nazi.

Wonder what the my-way-or-no-f***ing-way folks who want to throw out Santorum will say then.

23 posted on 03/18/2005 9:27:52 AM PST by Poohbah ("Hee Haw" was supposed to be a television show, not a political movement.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr
Great article by Byron.
With W renominating fillibustered nominees, John Bolton to the UN and Wolfie to the World Bank, successes in Iraq, Lebannon, etc. - the Dems have more fires popping up than they can handle.
Watch 'em twitch and squirm - they are confused and demoralized by W's political Blitzkrieg. "Brilliant".
24 posted on 03/18/2005 9:42:23 AM PST by Psalm 73 ("Gentlemen, you can't fight in here - this is the War Room".)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

So what was Benedict Arlen expecting? Senate demoKaRatz are a bunch of scum sucking maggots.


25 posted on 03/18/2005 9:48:13 AM PST by Al Gator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
Y'know... in a way, having Specter as the Judiciary Committee Chairman may be a benefit. Unlike Hatch, he is not seen as a hardliner on judicial nominations, and in fact is seen as a moderate. I suspect it will not be Frist who makes the motion to go nuclear. Frist is seen as the President's man in the Senate. It will be too easy for the Rats to paint this as Dubya's bidding. But if Arlen Specter is the one who raises the "point of order" on the judicial nominations, that changes the whole ball game. Specter is seen as the maverick, the moderate, the person who tries to build the bridges. It is harder to attack him as the Nazi than it would be to attack Frist as the Nazi.

Perhaps, but that assumes that Lucy will finally hold the football until Charlie Brown kicks it.

26 posted on 03/18/2005 9:55:35 AM PST by Diddle E. Squat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: marvlus
Specter = P.T. Barnum
Senate = Circus
Us = suckers born every minute. 

27 posted on 03/18/2005 9:59:01 AM PST by fish hawk (The best thing about the "Vast Right Wing Conspiracy" is : it is Vast and it is Right Wing.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Push the button for the people's sake!


28 posted on 03/18/2005 10:02:48 AM PST by Danae (Liberalism is a mental disorder.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

Both sides have their "go nuclear" options, I think that it's better to give a little on this and find some compromise candidates.


29 posted on 03/18/2005 10:10:12 AM PST by Zeroisanumber
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: xsysmgr

I am contemptuous of all attempts to cater to leftists that despise us all, and barring an act of God always will.

If Specter thought he would get cooperation from the radical left on the committee, I hesitate to ask where he has been for the last twenty five years.


30 posted on 03/18/2005 5:23:32 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: hchutch

That is an excellent point. Yet I have my doubts as to whether Arlen Specter would be willing to compromise his precious reputation as a "reasonable" Republicna in the Senate to confirm a set of judges that he doesn't like anyway.

The fateful decision was made a year ago, when the PResident and Senator Santorum barnstormed Pennsylvania to re-elect Specter in the primary. He would not have won otherwise. As it stood, with total establishment support and a popular President by his side, he barely squeaked by.


31 posted on 03/18/2005 5:25:55 PM PST by Zack Nguyen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: hchutch

You make a brilliant point. If Specter brings up the nuclear option, it's over. And he might. One thing that everybody should know is that you don't piss off Arlen Specter.


32 posted on 03/28/2005 6:01:38 AM PST by AmishDude (The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: Zack Nguyen
If Specter thought he would get cooperation from the radical left on the committee, I hesitate to ask where he has been for the last twenty five years.

Arlen Specter is no political naïf. He knows exactly what will happen. He asked the Democrats very very nicely to behave and they flipped him the bird. Specter will get his revenge, make no mistake. He may not care about the GOP, but he cares about himself and his reputation.

33 posted on 03/28/2005 6:08:25 AM PST by AmishDude (The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: hchutch
But if Arlen Specter is the one who raises the "point of order" on the judicial nominations, that changes the whole ball game.

Mother Teresa could come back from the dead to raise the point of order and the democrats would demonize her.

34 posted on 03/28/2005 6:20:44 AM PST by Raycpa
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: AmishDude

It's probably the only shot we have to hold 51 votes to uphold the point of order.


35 posted on 03/28/2005 7:49:08 AM PST by hchutch ("But, Rally, they're SMOKE GRENADES.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: hchutch

I don't know about that. But I love how the Democrats, for no other reason than to feed their own ego, decided to mock Specter. I wonder if the GOP got more concessions from Specter than that one speech.


36 posted on 03/28/2005 7:55:01 AM PST by AmishDude (The Clown Prince-in-a-can of Free Republic!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson