Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Protection for the Disabled - For Terri
FR_Addict ^ | March 31, 2005 | FR_Addict

Posted on 03/31/2005 12:41:54 PM PST by FR_addict

Please consider signing in Terri's honor.

Protection for the Disabled

http://www.petitiononline.com/TerriLaw/petition.html

This was started by Terri’s supporters at FreeRepublic.com

To: US Senate We the undersigned would like to petition the US Senate to please pass the House version of the Bill to protect the Disabled. Bill number H.R. 1151, “Incapacitated Persons Legal Protection Act”, was introduced by Rep. Dave Weldon on Mar 8th.

With Terri Schindler Schiavo's dehydration and starvation death today, we feel that this bill was the correct version to pass and needs to be resubmitted to the full Senate in honor of Terri. We want this bill voted on, so that we know where our Senators stand on this crucial matter.

A BILL To amend title 28, United States Code, to provide the protections of habeas corpus for certain incapacitated individuals whose life is in jeopardy, and for other purposes.

Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.

This Act may be cited as the `Incapacitated Persons Legal Protection Act of 2005'.

SEC. 2. FINDINGS AND PURPOSES.

(a) Findings- The Congress finds the following:

(1) Under the Fourteenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States, `No State . . . shall deprive any person of life . . . without due process of law...nor deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.'

(2) Section 5 of the Fourteenth Amendment empowers Congress `to enforce, by appropriate legislation, the provisions' of the Amendment. The United States Supreme Court has held that under this section, while Congress may not work a `substantive change in the governing law' under the other sections of the Fourteenth Amendment, it may adopt remedial measures exhibiting `a congruence and proportionality between the injury to be prevented or remedied and the means adopted to that end.' Tennessee v. Lane, 541 U.S. 509, 21 (2004); City of Boerne v. Flores, 521 U.S. 507, 519-20 (1997).

(b) Purposes- It is the purpose of this Act--

(1) to facilitate balancing the acknowledged right of persons to refuse consent to medical treatment and unwanted bodily intrusions with the right to consent to treatment, food, and fluids so as to preserve their lives; and

(2) in circumstances in which there is a contested judicial proceeding because of dispute about the expressed previous wishes or best interests of a person presently incapable of making known a choice concerning treatment, food, and fluids the denial of which will result in death, to provide that the fundamental due process and equal protection rights of incapacitated persons are protected by ensuring the availability of collateral review through habeas corpus proceedings.

SEC. 3. EXTENSION OF HABEAS PROTECTIONS.

(a) In General- Chapter 153 of title 28, United States Code, is amended by striking section 2256 and inserting the following:

`Sec. 2256. Extension of habeas protections to certain persons subject to court orders

`(a) For the purposes of this chapter, an incapacitated person shall be deemed to be in custody under sentence of a court established by Congress, or deemed to be in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State Court, as the case may be, when an order of such a court authorizes or directs the withholding or withdrawal of food or fluids or medical treatment necessary to sustain the person's life. In a habeas corpus proceeding under this section the person having custody shall be deemed to encompass those parties authorized or directed by the court order to withdraw or withhold food, fluids, or medical treatment, and there shall be no requirement to produce at the hearing the body of the incapacitated person.

`(b) Subsection (a) does not apply in the case of a judicial proceeding in which no party disputes, and the court finds, that the incapacitated person, while having capacity, had executed a written advance directive valid under applicable law that clearly authorized the withholding or withdrawal of food or fluids or medical treatment in the applicable circumstances.

`(c) As used in this section, the term `incapacitated person' means an individual who is presently incapable of making relevant decisions concerning the provision, withholding, or withdrawal of food, fluids or medical treatment under applicable state law.

`(d) Nothing in this section shall be construed to create substantive rights not otherwise secured by the Constitution and laws of the United States or of the several States. '.

(b) Clerical Amendment- The item relating to section 2256 in the table of sections at the beginning of chapter 153 of title 28, United States Code, is amended to read as follows:

`2256. Extension of habeas protections to certain persons subject to court orders.'.

(c) Prospective Effect- The remedies specified by this Act shall be available on behalf of any incapacitated person deemed to be in custody by its terms who is alive on or after the effective date of this Act.

Sincerely,

The Undersigned


TOPICS: Culture/Society; Government; Your Opinion/Questions
KEYWORDS: allterriallthetime; anotherterrithread; enoughalready; schiavo; schiavorepublic; schindler; senate; terri
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last
To: Dr. Frank fan
What did Congress "make illegal", or try to? Or are specifics, bearing on an actual point of some sort, too much to ask from someone who purports to crave rational discussion.

Is it too much to expect of you to be aware of what this thread's about?

61 posted on 04/01/2005 5:33:44 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 60 | View Replies]

To: inquest
Again: so your point is...?

Make a damn point or quit pinging me with these vacuous responses.

62 posted on 04/01/2005 5:48:42 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 61 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
Point? I answered your question. If it flew over your head, I don't really care.
63 posted on 04/01/2005 6:08:10 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 62 | View Replies]

To: inquest

You don't have a point, you just like pinging me with vacuous responses. Got it. No more, I trust. Bye,


64 posted on 04/01/2005 6:10:15 PM PST by Dr. Frank fan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 63 | View Replies]

To: Dr. Frank fan
I gave you all the "point" you needed in order to figure out the answer to your question. I'd have probably gone into further detail if I thought there was sincere lack of understanding, but with you, it wasn't worth the effort.
65 posted on 04/01/2005 6:40:32 PM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Protection for the Disabled
http://www.petitiononline.com/TerriLaw/petition.html


66 posted on 04/01/2005 7:22:31 PM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

Please consider signing this petition to protect all the disabled:

Protection for the Disabled
http://www.petitiononline.com/TerriLaw/petition.html


67 posted on 04/02/2005 6:10:40 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
For those that thought the Bill was the first to recognized "assisted-suicide", I started doing a little research. Reading over the Bill that was passed, I noticed a reference to the "Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990" This bill was passed as part of the OmnibusBudget Reconciliation Act of 1990. It looks like "advanced directives" were slipped in by Congress at that time.
68 posted on 04/02/2005 7:56:20 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict
Below is my research into the Patient Self-Determination Act of 1990. It evidently was passed as part of the Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act of 1990. They refer to it in part 3 and Bill H.R.5067 is listed as a related bill.

The sponsors were:
Mr. LEVIN of Michigan (for himself, Mr. SWIFT, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. MOODY, Mr. FAUNTROY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. FOGLIETTA, and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Energy and Commerce

It looks to me as if the hospice may have violated this law.

`(B) to document in the individual's medical record whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
`(D) to ensure compliance with requirements of State law respecting advance directives at facilities of the provider or organization;
`(3) In this subsection, the term `advance directive' means a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law and relating to the provision of such care when the individual is incapacitated.'.

When the hospice first took Terri, they were required by law to document in the individual's medical record whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;

At the time she first entered the hospice, the case was not decided, so they should have had documentation in Terri's medical record that she did not have an advanced directive.

If they did not, then it looks like the hospice violated Federal law.
------

Patient Self Determination Act of 1990 (Introduced in House)
HR 5067 IH
101st CONGRESS
2d Session
H. R. 5067
To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to require providers of services and health maintenance organizations under the medicare and medicaid programs to assure that individuals receiving services will be given an opportunity to participate in and direct health care decisions affecting themselves.
IN THE HOUSE OF REPRESENTATIVES
June 18, 1990
Mr. LEVIN of Michigan (for himself, Mr. SWIFT, Mr. WAXMAN, Mr. MOODY, Mr. FAUNTROY, Mr. MCDERMOTT, Ms. PELOSI, Mr. FOGLIETTA, and Mr. LEWIS of Georgia) introduced the following bill; which was referred jointly to the Committees on Ways and Means, and Energy and Commerce

A BILL
To amend titles XVIII and XIX of the Social Security Act to require providers of services and health maintenance organizations under the medicare and medicaid programs to assure that individuals receiving services will be given an opportunity to participate in and direct health care decisions affecting themselves.
Be it enacted by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,
SECTION 1. SHORT TITLE.
This Act may be cited as the `Patient Self Determination Act of 1990'.
SEC. 2. MEDICARE PROVIDER AGREEMENTS ASSURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PATIENT'S RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN AND DIRECT HEALTH CARE DECISIONS AFFECTING THE PATIENT.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 1866(a)(1) of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1395cc(a)(1)) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)(1)--
(A) by striking `and' at the end of subparagraph (O),
(B) by striking the period at the end of subparagraph (P) and inserting `, and', and
(C) by inserting after subparagraph (P) the following new subparagraph:
`(Q) in the case of hospitals, skilled nursing facilities, home health agencies, and hospice programs, to comply with the requirement of subsection (f) (relating to maintaining written policies and procedures respecting advance directives).'; and
(2) by inserting after subsection (e) the following new subsection:
`(f)(1) For purposes of subsection (a)(1)(Q) and sections 1819(c)(2)(E), 1833(r), 1876(c)(8), and 1891(a)(6), the requirement of this subsection is that a provider of services or prepaid or eligible organization (as the case may be) maintain written policies and procedures with respect to all adult individuals receiving medical care by or through the provider or organization--
`(A) to provide written information to each such individual concerning--
`(i) an individual's rights under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State) to make decisions concerning such medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and the right to formulate advance directives (as defined in paragraph (3)), and
`(ii) the written policies of the provider or organization respecting the implementation of such rights;
`(B) to document in the individual's medical record whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
`(C) not to condition the provision of care or otherwise discriminate against an individual based on whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
`(D) to ensure compliance with requirements of State law respecting advance directives at facilities of the provider or organization; and
`(E) to provide (individually or with others) for education for staff and the community on issues concerning advance directives.
Subparagraph (C) shall not be construed as requiring the provision of care which conflicts with an advance directive.
`(2) The written information described in paragraph (1)(A) shall be provided to an adult individual--
`(A) in the case of a hospital, at the time of the individual's admission as an inpatient,
`(B) in the case of a skilled nursing facility, at the time of the individual's admission as a resident,
`(C) in the case of a home health agency, in advance of the individual coming under the care of the agency,
`(D) in the case of a hospice program, at the time of initial receipt of hospice care by the individual from the program, and
`(E) in the case of an eligible organization (as defined in section 1876(b)) or an organization provided payments under section 1833(a)(1)(A), at the time of enrollment of the individual with the organization.
`(3) In this subsection, the term `advance directive' means a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law and relating to the provision of such care when the individual is incapacitated.'.
(b) APPLICATION TO PREPAID ORGANIZATIONS-
(1) ELIGIBLE ORGANIZATIONS- Section 1876(c) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395mm(c)) is amended by adding at the end the following new paragraph:
`(8) A contract under this section shall provide that the eligible organization shall meet the requirement of section 1866(f) (relating to maintaining written policies and procedures respecting advance directives).'.
(2) OTHER PREPAID ORGANIZATIONS- Section 1833 of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395l) is amended by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`(r) The Secretary may not provide for payment under subsection (a)(1)(A) with respect to an organization unless the organization provides assurances satisfactory to the Secretary that the organization meets the requirement of section 1866(f) (relating to maintaining written policies and procedures respecting advance directives).'.
(c) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS-
(1) Section 1819(c)(1) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395i-3(c)(1)) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(E) INFORMATION RESPECTING ADVANCE DIRECTIVES- A skilled nursing facility must comply with the requirement of section 1866(f) (relating to maintaining written policies and procedures respecting advance directives).'.
(2) Section 1891(a) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1395bbb(a)) is amended by adding at the end the following:
`(6) The agency complies with the requirement of section 1866(f) (relating to maintaining written policies and procedures respecting advance directives).'.
(d) EFFECTIVE DATES-
(1) The amendments made by subsections (a) and (c) shall apply with respect to services furnished on or after the first day of the first month beginning more than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
(2) The amendments made by subsection (b) shall apply to contracts under section 1876 of the Social Security Act and payments under section 1833(a)(1)(A) of such Act as of first day of the first month beginning more than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 3. MEDICAID STATE PLANS ASSURING THE IMPLEMENTATION OF A PATIENT'S RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN AND DIRECT HEALTH CARE DECISIONS AFFECTING THE PATIENT.
(a) IN GENERAL- Section 1902 of the Social Security Act (42 U.S.C. 1396a(a)) is amended--
(1) in subsection (a)--
(A) by striking `and' at the end of paragraph (52),
(B) by striking the period at the end of paragraph (53) and inserting `; and', and
(C) by inserting after paragraph (53) the following new paragraph:
`(54) provide that each hospital, nursing facility, provider of home health care or personal care services, hospice program, or health maintenance organization (as defined in section 1903(m)(1)(A)) receiving funds under the plan shall comply with the requirement of subsection(s).'; and
(2) by adding at the end the following new subsection:
`(s)(1) For purposes of subsection (a)(54) and sections 1903(m)(1)(A) and 1919(c)(2)(E), the requirement of this subsection is that a provider or organization (as the case may be) maintain written policies and procedures with respect to all adult individuals receiving medical care by or through the provider or organization--
`(A) to provide written information to each such individual concerning--
`(i) an individual's rights under State law (whether statutory or as recognized by the courts of the State) to make decisions concerning such medical care, including the right to accept or refuse medical or surgical treatment and the right to formulate advance directives (as defined in paragraph (3)), and
`(ii) the hospital's written policies respecting the implementation of such rights;
`(B) to document in the individual's medical record whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
`(C) not to condition the provision of care or otherwise discriminate against an individual based on whether or not the individual has executed an advance directive;
`(D) to ensure compliance with requirements of State law respecting advance directives; and
`(E) to provide (individually or with others) for education for staff and the community on issues concerning advance directives.
Subparagraph (C) shall not be construed as requiring the provision of care which conflicts with an advance directive.
`(2) The written information described in paragraph (1)(A) shall be provided to an adult individual--
`(A) in the case of a hospital, at the time of the individual's admission as an inpatient,
`(B) in the case of a nursing facility, at the time of the individual's admission as a resident,
`(C) in the case of a provider of home health care or personal care services, in advance of the individual coming under the care of the provider,
`(D) in the case of a hospice program, at the time of initial receipt of hospice care by the individual from the program, and
`(E) in the case of a health maintenance organization, at the time of enrollment of the individual with the organization.
`(3) In this subsection, the term `advance directive' means a written instruction, such as a living will or durable power of attorney for health care, recognized under State law and relating to the provision of such care when the individual is incapacitated.'.
(b) CONFORMING AMENDMENTS-
(1) Section 1903(m)(1)(A) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396b(m)(1)(A)) is amended--
(A) by inserting `meets the requirement of section 1902(s)' after `which' the first place it appears, and
(B) by inserting `meets the requirement of section 1902(a) and' after `which' the second place it appears.
(2) Section 1919(c)(2) of such Act (42 U.S.C. 1396r(c)(2)) is amended by adding at the end the following new subparagraph:
`(E) INFORMATION RESPECTING ADVANCE DIRECTIVES- A nursing facility must comply with the requirement of section 1902(s) (relating to maintaining written policies and procedures respecting advance directives).'.
(c) EFFECTIVE DATE- The amendments made by this section shall apply with respect to services furnished on or after the first day of the first month beginning more than 1 year after the date of the enactment of this Act.
SEC. 4. STUDY TO ASSESS IMPLEMENTATION OF A PATIENT'S RIGHT TO PARTICIPATE IN AND DIRECT HEALTH CARE DECISIONS AFFECTING THE PATIENT.
(a) IN GENERAL- The Secretary of Health and Human Services shall (subject to subsection (b)) enter into an agreement with the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences to conduct a study with respect to the context in which directed health care decisions (including advance directives) are made and carried out, including the incidence and processes of decision-making about life-sustaining treatment that occur with and without advance directives.
(b) ARRANGEMENTS FOR STUDY- The Secretary shall request the Institute of Medicine of the National Academy of Sciences to submit an application to conduct the study described in subsection (a). If the Institute submits an acceptable application, the Secretary shall enter into an appropriate arrangement with the Academy for the conduct of the study within 28 days of the date the application is received. If the Institute does not submit an acceptable application to conduct the study, the Secretary may request one or more appropriate nonprofit private entities to submit an application to conduct the study and may enter into an appropriate arrangement for the conduct of the study by the entity which submits the best acceptable application.
(c) REPORT- The results of the study shall be reported to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate and the Secretary by not later than 4 years after the date of the enactment of this Act. Such report shall include such recommendations for legislation as may be appropriate to carry out further the purpose of this Act.
SEC. 5. PUBLIC EDUCATION DEMONSTRATION PROJECT.
The Secretary of Health and Human Services, no later than 6 months after the date of the enactment of this Act, shall develop and implement a demonstration project in selected States to inform the public of the option to execute advance directives and of a patient's right to participate and direct health care decisions. The Secretary shall report to the Committees on Ways and Means and Energy and Commerce of the House of Representatives and the Committee on Finance of the Senate on the results of the project and on whether such project should be expanded to cover all the States.
69 posted on 04/02/2005 9:09:33 AM PST by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 68 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

oh oh!! I do not have a " legal mind" but for any of you who could get this into the hands of the right people, I would say that this would be a important FINDING!!


70 posted on 04/02/2005 11:33:34 AM PST by pollywog (Psalm 121;1 I Lift my eyes to the hills from whence cometh my help.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

Here's the final vote on the compromised version of Terri's bill in the US House:
http://clerk.house.gov/evs/2005/roll090.xml

The US Senate used a voice vote:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN00686:@@@X

Here's the co-sponsors that were supporting Terri's bill on one of the earlier versions:
http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/bdquery/z?d109:SN00653:@@@P

This may help us sort the good guys from the bad guys. It looks like the Senate members didn't put their votes on record.


71 posted on 04/04/2005 7:22:19 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: All

I've been doing research on when food and water became a life-prolonging procedure in Florida and who was Governor at the time.

It looks like 1999 is correct and that Governor Bush signed it into law.

End-of-life Care:
06/11/1999 Approved by Governor; Chapter No. 99-331

The definition change for what is a life-prolonging procedure was introduced by the Committee on Health, Aging and Long-Term Care and Senator Klein

Jeb Bush was elected in Nov. 1998 and reelected in Nov. 2002. So, he should have been Governor on 6/11/1999 when the changes were put into effect.

This is the way it read prior to 1999 changes:

1998:

9) "Life-prolonging procedure" means any medical procedure, treatment, or intervention which:
(a) Utilizes mechanical or other artificial means to sustain, restore, or supplant a spontaneous vital function; and
(b) When applied to a patient in a terminal condition, serves only to prolong the process of dying.

The term "life-prolonging procedure" does not include the administration of medication or performance of medical procedure, when such medication or procedure is deemed necessary to provide comfort care or to alleviate pain.

1999 through 2004: (2005 not listed yet)
(10) "Life-prolonging procedure" means any medical procedure, treatment, or intervention, including artificially provided sustenance and hydration, which sustains, restores, or supplants a spontaneous vital function. The term does not include the administration of medication or performance of medical procedure, when such medication or procedure is deemed necessary to provide comfort care or to alleviate pain.

The definitions are in chapter 765 of the Florida Statutes, specifically:
PART I
GENERAL PROVISIONS
765.101 Definitions.

I can not think of any other reason for the change in this law, except to make it easier to eliminate people like Terri. Jeb Bush allowed this change by signing it into law. He must now take political responsibility for signing this law.


72 posted on 04/05/2005 10:36:00 AM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 71 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

For clarification will you please explain to me what is in this bill that the courts in Fla. 11th Circuit and S.C. could not claim they did? This bill does not appear to be strong enough or clear enough in the way it is presented.


73 posted on 04/05/2005 12:03:24 PM PDT by WVNan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: All

A new organization called Justice For Terri Committee is planning on hiring an investigatin firm to look into Terri's case.

I like the idea of hiring an independent investigative agency.

I posted information on the group here:

Scared to Death by The Starved to Death - ( Terri )
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1383882/posts?page=1#1


74 posted on 04/14/2005 3:16:45 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: FR_addict

For those following Ora Mae Magouirk's case:

Happy ending for 'grandma'? ( Dehydration & Starvation case similar to Terri )
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1383894/posts


75 posted on 04/14/2005 3:34:44 PM PDT by FR_addict
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 74 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-75 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson