Posted on 04/17/2005 10:45:46 AM PDT by Pikamax
SOUTH WINDSOR -- Four high school students were sent home Friday after they wore T-shirts bearing anti-homosexual slogans to school, causing a series of disturbances as other students became "emotionally distraught," students and school officials said. The boys, who wore white T-shirts on which they had written, "Adam and Eve, Not Adam and Steve," say their constitutional right to free speech has been violated.
Advertisement
"We were just voicing our opinions," said Steven Vendetta, who made the T-shirts with his friends, Kyle Shinfield, David Grimaldi, and another student who asked not to be identified. "We didn't tell other people to think what we're thinking. We just told them what we think."
But other students say they felt threatened by the shirts, which also quoted Bible verses pertaining to homosexuality.
"I didn't feel safe at this school today," said Diana Rosen, who is co-president of the school's Gay-Straight Alliance.
Vendetta said the impetus for the T-shirts came earlier in the week, when students at the high school took part in the annual Day of Silence, a project orchestrated by the national Gay, Lesbian, and Straight Education Network. On the Day of Silence, students across the country do not speak, as a reminder of the discrimination and harassment experienced by homosexuals.
Students at the high school also wore signs showing their support for legislation that would recognize civil unions for same-sex couples in Connecticut, Vendetta said.
Vendetta and his friends, who oppose civil unions, wanted to make their feelings known.
"We felt if they could voice their opinions for it, we could voice our opinion against it," he said. "There is another side to this debate, and we're representing it."
Almost immediately, the shirts drew comment and debate from other students, Vendetta said.
"I walked down the hall, and people were either cheering me on, yelling at me, or just sneering," he said. "It was the most intense experience."
Teachers brought the situation to the attention of high school Principal John DiIorio, who said Friday that the law protects students' freedom of speech, as long as that speech doesn't disrupt the educational process.
He told the boys they could continue to wear the shirts as long as they didn't become a distraction to others.
The students returned to class. But heated arguments and altercations ensued almost immediately, with some students becoming "very emotional," said student Sam Etter.
Rosen said that when she first saw the shirts, she "almost didn't believe it." She became very upset, crying and spending most of the day in administrators' and guidance counselor's offices. She also got into several arguments, she said.
"I saw a large crowd gathered during one of our lunch waves," said senior William "B.J." Haun. "A large debate was going on. It involved a lot of people. By the end of the day, everyone was talking about it and giving their two cents."
Eventually, DiIorio called the boys into the office and told them that other students were becoming "emotionally distraught," Shinfield said. He then asked the boys to remove the shirts. They refused and were sent home.
DiIorio said no disciplinary action has been taken against them.
Shinfield, who says he believes "the choice to become homosexual is against the will of God," says he doesn't regret what he did.
"If we took the shirts off, it ruined the whole point of wearing them," he said. "I wouldn't have been able to deal with my conscience. This topic is really important to me."
But he added that he didn't intend to hurt other students' feelings.
"It upset me that people took it personally," he said.
Alex Goldberg, a member of the Gay-Straight Alliance, said his classmates have a right to their opinions but took it too far.
"School is supposed to be a safe zone for everyone," he said. "It's crossing the line when you target other people."
Well, isn't that special?
I thought free speech also extended to schools, and to those who oppose PC.
If not, I guess we should paint yellow lines around ours schools and pass out a notice, "free speech prohibited
if it offends the left".
Isn't it ironic that those who have their feelings assualted never seem to be able to grasp that they assault others' feelings. Oh, the guilt! Oh, the HUMANITY!!
sarcasm off...
I don't think it is a good idea to have ANY tee-shirts with slogans. But, if the left can wear them, then the right gets the same freedom. And boy how the liberals hate it when the right starts speaking up! LOL Even the kids are sick of all this PC nonsense.
1 : agitated with doubt or mental conflict
2 : INSANE
So upon reading these tee shirts other students became troubled with doubt (presumably of their own views), faced with a mental conflict or just plain insane.
Wow, those are some powerful tee shirts...or some very flimsy people viewing them.
other students became "emotionally distraught"
=======
Oh no... please say it isn't so...
Good grief, this is America!
"emotionally distraughtness" is absolutely positively prohibited to ever occur in the land of the Free and the home of the Brave...
I am now so "emotionally distraught" over this entire situation... I think I'm gonna maybe kinda sorta pass out !!! ;-))
Notice, it wasn't "I wasn't safe at school today", it's "I didn't feel safe at school today", regardless of a lack of threat. Crux of the problem.
Outstanding.
APf
Hetero sexuals need to screech about everything to frustrate them.
=======
Ya know... that's another thing that irritates me these days... being called a Hetero sexual...
Next thing they'll be calling me is a Homo sapian !!!
Dammit... I'M A MAN... and I'm damned proud of it !!! ;-))
Students at the high school also wore signs showing their support for legislation that would recognize civil unions for same-sex couples in Connecticut, Vendetta said.
Vendetta is correct. Some students decided to take part in a day of silence, which was orchestrated by a NATIONAL organization, pushing an agenda. Thus, it was NATIONAL effort, involving public schools throughout the nation on an issue of NATIONAL interest and some students supported that agenda. Ok, so be it. However, other students then exercised their right to free speech in opposition to a NATIONAL agenda being promoted in public schools supportive of a lifestyle and practices with which they didn't agree, and someone got “offended.”
Also to be considered, was support from some students for “legislation” recognizing same sex unions. Fine. But once one side supports “legislation,” they are advocating a political act, and once it becomes “political” it also becomes a free speech issue, and those opposing a political act have an inherent First Amendment right of free speech in their opposition, and they cannot arbitrarily be silenced because others are “offended.”
Finally, if there were disruptions, it wasn’t being caused by Vendetta or Shinfield, it was caused by students who were being “intolerant” of their views. It is the students who were being “intolerant” who should have been sent home.
No offense meant. I suppose I should have said, "We." As in, "We need to screech about everything, to show them how stupid liberals look."
I've been surprised at the number of people on this forum who think the Constitution doesn't protect 'minors'. Glad to see someone knows better.
Free speech for thee, but not for me?
Conversely, there's the Hazelwood decision, which gave school officials broad powers to censor school newspapers. Anyone who's attended a public school in the last 20 years knows that free speech rights are heavily regulated when you cross the threshold.
http://teacher.scholastic.com/researchtools/articlearchives/civics/usgovt/judic/hazstupr.htm
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.