To: calcowgirl
Many McClintock voters threw away their votes to enable Democrats by voting for McClintock.
Some of the more logical voters went for Arnold. McClintock absolutely sucks when getting the vote in this state in a statewide election.
I think his risk of sabotage was ONLY about his desire to get his name out there for the future.
Of course if Bustamante won from McClintock's tactics, instead of attempting to justify his actions, we'd be all out trying to actively remove him from office. RECALL!
85 posted on
04/25/2005 8:16:05 PM PDT by
A CA Guy
(God Bless America, God bless and keep safe our fighting men and women.)
To: A CA Guy
Bustamonte could not have won not matter how much they split the vote. The combined Republicans got 63%, Bustamonte only got 31%.
88 posted on
04/25/2005 8:18:14 PM PDT by
AVNevis
(www.cahsconservative.blogspot.com Great Political Discussion from the eyes of a High School Student)
To: A CA Guy
>>Some of the more logical voters went for Arnold.
And what did that get you? A bunch of leftists appointed to high positions, communistic conservancies, more debt, higher spending, unaffordable stem cell research. And just wait for the additional borrowing in his "spending reform", taxpayer funded solar energy mandates, increased toll roads, etc.
I voted for a conservative. You voted for a Trojan Horse.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson