I think Aubrey is a little envious of Anns looks.
Posted on 04/29/2005 9:42:30 AM PDT by John Lenin
But I thought the whole idea was to make America a better place in keeping with the ideals of the founders. That means changing minds and hearts and attitudes. I don't see her as having made a significant contribution to that goal. JMO.
But Randi Rhodes is ok, cause she just jokes her radical ideas? BAH!
Looks have nothing to do with it. This Aubrey what's-her-name is just another flaming liberal who takes herself too seriously. She thinks we're all too dumb to know hyperbole when we hear it. Good gawd, get over yourself, Aubrey.
at least her attacks are backed up with facts, unlike this hit piece.
Hey! 61 posts and only one black n white photo. I better learn how to post a pic so I can pick up the slack.
Don't forget tampons
"Coulter is an emaciated leggy blonde"
And Jerold Nadler is a (you fill in the blanks).
And Maxine Watters is a ...
And Judy Woodruff is a ...
These people can't stop spewing venom even when they're complaining about venomous conservatives.
You asked for it...
Just a head shot. Your PC screen isn't big enough to view my ample buttocks.
--Aubrey Salazar
She looks like a younger version of CNN Pentagon reporter Barbara Starr.
The author is just mad because left wing women are not marriage material.
NO Aubrey.. that would be a democrat.. you know a Jerry Springer type..
Ann is about the leanest meanest RINO exposer of all time..
Democrats, other liberals, and left wing Moonbats are topics of conversation to expose the RINOs..
RINOs you see Aubrey are the REAL enemy.. democrats are inconsequential..
Democrats would be laughed at except for the RINOs..
Ann Coulter has zeroed in on Americas REAL DISEASE...
The real stealth traitors.... RINOs.. that legitimize the democrats..
The libs got in a snowball fight with a girl and are angry because they are getting pelted twice as hard as they can throw.
You apparently aren't that familiar with the concept of satire.
You also accuse her of making ad hominem attacks and then make such attacks against her.
Coulter is purposfully abrasive. She's overly dramatic on purpose. She makes outrageous statements to draw people's attention to the detailed and throughly researched facts she presents.
It's a unique way of presenting information, but those who criticize her don't attack her on the core facts, they attack her on the delivery.
That is so right. For too long conservatives have politely waited for the left to finish their arguments, have conceded some point to seem even-handed and started to make their own point only to get a pie in the face. Ann shows us that it's stupid to do any of this. Take two steps forward, get in their face and keep them sputtering and on the defensive. It works ever so much better. Maybe we can go back to polite, slow, reasoned discussion some day, but not as long as they keep their fingers in their ears and yell blablbalblalbalblbla. Ann showed us the most effective way of dealing with these kids.
And performs a damned admirable public service in the process.
But ask for her views on almost any subject (except gay marriage and abortion "rights") and she lines up well with Ann Coulter (and me, of course).
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
