Ultra-conservative talk show host and author Anne Coulter
blasted liberals Saturday at Boston College.
Posted on 04/29/2005 9:42:30 AM PDT by John Lenin
She was recently interviewed by Time magazine, and her image was bestowed on the cover. Ann Coulter, the demagogic ultra-conservative who is deeply despised by liberals for her lippy radicalism towards anyone left of John Ashcroft, has apparently made a legitimate profession out of hate. Evidently, Time must really be scraping the bottom of the yellow journalism barrel for their cover stories these days, if they are featuring a woman whom Jerry Falwell calls in the Time article, a little aggressive.
What surprises me is how easily her ad hominem, screwball attacks have taken hold in America. Is this what public political discourse has been reduced to? An educated woman of impressive resume status goes on talk shows to display her ignorance by spewing sensationalist sound bites, like I think a baseball bat is the most effective way these days [to talk to liberals] and I'm so pleased with my gender. We're not that bright. Coulter has also written a few books on these subjects as well.
Throughout her books, which include titles like, Slander: Liberal Lies About the American Right and How to Talk to a Liberal (If You Must), Coulter rattles the cages of liberal-thinkers with incitive barrages. There is not a shred of regard or empathy for the other side of the coin, and she wallows in grossly offensive statements like a pig in warm mud. I suppose I am fascinated by the fascination. Maybe her notoriety has partly to do with her looks.
Coulter is an emaciated leggy blonde with a penchant for Ally McBeal power suits, the ones where the skirt just barely covers her skeletal derriere. In the Time article, the writer John Cloud attributes Coulter as having a willowy, sex-kitten pulchritude and also wrote that she has an aura of privilege [and] wealth.” To me, Ann Coulter looks much like the women you might find in a backwater Nevada brothel. A pack-a-day, over-wrought, mouthy lady of the night with poorly dyed roots.
She did get crocked on white Bordeaux during her interview with Time magazine. White Bordeaux to Thunderbird wrapped in a brown paper bag is not a far leap if she ever buckles under the pressure of her controversial iconic existence. To not take her seriously, is advice better taken by herself. Coulter should try and avoid sleeping with the gin, or taking the Limbaugh Ludes (Vicodin), that will be just the angle her liberal fan base needs to discredit her entirely. Even if she holds it together, her name is only about five famous minutes away from becoming an FCC indecency violation.
Let's talk about Coulter's state of mind. Coulter insists it is liberals who are in need of a mental overhaul. She told a Frontpage Magazine reporter last year, Liberalism is a mental defect. Liberals are wracked by self-loathing as the result of some traumatic incident. ...There was an absence of the sort of trauma that would deprive me of normal, instinctual reactions to things. Interesting. To be perfectly certain, not even the hardest nosed, far-right conservative would suggest that the United States nuke North Korea for fun. She is definitely lacking in international relations skills. Even the most pious fire and brimstone religious zealot would shy from saying as Coulter did, God says, Earth is yours. Take it. Rape it. It’s yours. Coulter seems to be the dangerous lunatic.
Metaphorically, she is a terrorist of ideas and has her bony fingers poised over the button that would detonate any and all freedom of thought. Conservatives, liberals, and everyone in between should worry about her level of celebrity. This country needs a civilized exchange on politics, which includes a modicum of deference.
Ann Coulter is not just snickering at liberals on her way to the bank, she is also toasting the appetite America has for the unintelligent rabble-rousing she so deftly produces. Hopefully her stock of white Bordeaux runs out soon.
I, for one, like ultra-conservative, aggressive women. ;-)
I hate to be childish about it but, "They started it!!!!"
Seriously, this is just more mock outrage by the left. They have a long and proud tradition of shouting people down.
Liberals accusing someone of a "hate agenda"????
Let's see, how do you spell HYPOCRISY?
Remember, the left ALWAYS ACCUSES THEIR OPPONENTS OF DOING EXACTLY WHAT THEY DO!!! They are soooo predictable.
you want to see hate? take a gander at almost ANY liberal commentator these days. look at James Carville. look at the idiot from Air America. Ann never advocated assasination - even in jest. look at Michael moore.
I love the smell of fried whining democrat hypocrite losers in the morning.
Proof that she is making a difference...
As I will hold my breath waiting for their 'Al Frankin is a hurtful brand of pundit' article....
She came in November (I should know since I was there).
Waaaaaaa. Waaaaaaaa. BooHooHooHoo. Waaaaa.
That's how she makes her money. She knows her audience.
And Ann is the one that is being hurtful...These forked-tongue libs can't wait 5 seconds to spew their hypocrisy.
Interesting that the author doesn't really try to argue against Anne's positions and arguments but goes straight for character assassination and insults about her personal appearance.
Hello, pot? This is kettle...
It is positively orgasmic when Libs start to squeal. You go girl!
Ann Coulter is light weight went compared to the MASSIVE leverage presented by the NYT, LATimes, and Boston Globe.
The MSM is in panic mode because they are IRRELEVANT to the intelectual debate. The MSM represents propaganda not information.
The MSM is just a repeater for DNC lies in order to morph them into accpeted truth ala "brave new world".
***************
Meow.
The woman that wrote this got so venomous about Ann's looks, lifestyle etc., so obviously SHE isn't tall, thin and wealthy enough in her low self-esteem....
Instead of throwing a pie, she threw her self respect at Ann, and, just like at the college, she missed....
Really? Do you think has converted significant numbers of liberals to conservatism? (Whatever that means)
Amen, they can't win in the arena of ideas. Ann can because she makes sense.
And this twerp is complaining about "ad hominem, screwball attacks"??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.