Citation: Misrepresenting story - Inaccurate Title
You are issuing a "citation"? How droll. -- You gots to show me you badges first..
How about an 'indictment in the court of pubic opinion'; you plead; I sentence; you perform some helpful public service and additionally you promise never to repeat said infraction again?
How bout I laugh a lot at your imagined power trip?
I think it's just a bit more than disingenuous to 'plant' such a misleading title only to stir up the passions of others in an intentionally false and misleading manner.
Get a grip _jimmy.. That hype don't hunt.
Just to clarify, what exactly was it the ATF did 'again'?
The ATF routinely abuses the power [that Congress unconstitutionally gave them] to 'regulate' firearms. Try reading the 2nd Amendment for original intent sometime _jim.. Our right to bear arms is being infringed, quite obviously.
It's not very clear in my mind, and it's probably ambiguous by what exactly is meant by that to more than just a few others reading these threads ...
I just addressed the fact that there are quite a few freepers like you around here. Thanks for admitting it.
I just addressed the fact that there are quite a few freepers like ...Nice dodge; nice try at a smear.
That's two more citations on top of the original ...
Also, you're being HIGHLY presumptive - and you don't even know me or my position on a whole host of issues - make that yet a fourth citation.
Got anything else to say that I can 'rack up' more citations with?
Just to clarify, what exactly was it the ATF did 'again'?Your headliine stated "ATF at it again" and so far you have failed to show where they were "at it again".The ATF routinely abuses the power ...
I say you initially read this story, salivated over mental images that the ATF had once again overstepped it's authority, hastily posted this story, and while doing so drafted an incorrect/fabricated headline.
Is that about right?