You seem to think that having a verbal response to everything makes a point. It doesn't.
My essay, again makes the essential distinctions, whether you like them or not. It will be judged not by what you say, or by what I say about it; but by how well it resonates with the individual readers.
I am going to dinner. But anyone interested can judge for themselves: Terry Schiavo: An End To Rational Analysis?
True but unfortunately you're not one of them. You're agenda extended to writing an ill informed essay about the Schiavo case.
You seem to think that having a verbal response to everything makes a point. It doesn't.
It does and you're non response to the points I made make an even bigger point. You're an ideologue uninterested in rational discourse.
My essay, again makes the essential distinctions, whether you like them or not. It will be judged not by what you say, or by what I say about it; but by how well it resonates with the individual readers.
Your essay sucks. That is of course, just one man's opinion. But there you have it.
I am going to dinner. But anyone interested can judge for themselves: Terry Schiavo: An End To Rational Analysis?
I've judged you and your essay wanting. Enjoy your dinner.