Michelle Malkin: The Wonkette-ization of Laura Bush

Michelle Malkin ^ | May 3, 2005 | Michelle Malkin

[EveningStar]

Most of Mrs. Bush's humor at the correspondents' dinner was just right: Edgy but not over the edge. But I think the stripper and horse jokes were totally beneath her.

Just put it to the other-shoe test: If it were Teresa Heinz Kerry standing up on the dais telling the same jokes, the conservative commentariat would be buzzing for the rest of the year about what a tasteless skank she is.

[Howlin]

t, notice that the very same people who had their noses out of joint about Kidd are the very same ones raising hell about Laura!

[MikefromOhio]

However, the majority of people just disagreed with her comments

You see, your premise from the start is incorrect. A majority of the people on FR thought the comments were HILARIOUS and FUNNY. it is just that there are 10 or 15 people on FR that want to be stuck up @$$holes (not including you) that want to be vile and throw insults around.

[Soul Seeker]

Ah, thank you for context.

[Howlin]

LOL!

[TheForceOfOne]

Your kidding me! lol Thanks just to funny.

[Howlin]

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/1396068/posts?page=661#661

[Howlin]

Honest?

[TheForceOfOne]

I defended Kid Rock too.

[Selkie]

http://www.freerepublic.com/~johnnyz/

I also tend to like nasty chick groups like Li'l Kim, T.A.T.U. (the Russian lesbians), Foxy Brown, and dumb blonde Christina Aguilera>>>>

Yeeah you're a real class act.
::rolls eyes::

[onyx]

just suspect it's because you can't find many Laura-haters on this thread when you said there were so many.




Are you deaf, dumb, dense, obtuse or just plain argumentative?

The thread was PULLED by Jim. ALL POSTS ARE GONE.

[Peach]

We've watched it happen in real time over a month ago.

We tried to warn JR about it, but nothing was done. I got called a nutjob for saying there was a coup underway, but the posts of the last few days speak for themselves.

[familyop]

"Last night there were some posts that Hillary shouldn't have even spoken at the event, for goodness sake.

That sounds like the Taliban in terms of keeping women quiet and a code of morality as outlined by the MEN."

Hillary's comments aren't fit for public consumption any time. Because we are against having Hitlery seen or heard in public does not mean that we're woman haters or members of the Taliban.

[Howlin]

I'm beginning to get the impression that some of these people just like to argue their point.

Repeatedly.

[Howlin]

Me, too.

[Peach]

I mis-typed. That should have said Laura.

[what's up]

But I find it EXTREMELY telling that you haven't said a word about some of the more extreme and disgusting comments about our lovely First Lady.

That's because I haven't seen them on this thread. And I don't have talk radio on all day so I haven't heard any there either. So I don't know what you mean by "EXTREMELY telling".

However, I like Laura a lot, have always liked her and would reply heatedly to those who called her ugly names.

However, I don't like those who took exception with a couple of her comments (like me) being equated with the Taliban. That's what I took exception to on this thread.

[Goodgirlinred]

"LETTING the First Lady do this"??? She is her own woman. She would never consciously do anything to harm her husband or her political party. But we do not have the right to tell her what to do. What she does is between her and her husband. He is the person we elected, not her. She does not have to answer to us.

[185JHP]

BTTT

[onyx]

I know. Nothing is being done this time either.

Just pull the threads and wipe out all the evidence, so the self righteous can sublimely post in full fledged sanctimony and denial.

[Peach]

I understand.

We just have too many males who have female issues who are trying to enforce their moral code on everyone else.

The day the First Lady isn't quite Christian enough for some freepers, we're in trouble. That's where the Taliban analogy came in.