To: Dog Gone; Goodgirlinred; neutrino; ninenot; A. Pole
Well what about NAFTA? Isn't that a Free Trade Zone? And yet the Mexicans are pouring in at an even faster rate then ever.
685 posted on
05/31/2005 10:37:43 AM PDT by
jb6
(Truth == Christ)
To: jb6
And yet the Mexicans are pouring in at an even faster rate then ever. That's because neither party will build a wall on the border and enforce immigration laws. Unlike before NAFTA when we had zero illegals, right?
691 posted on
05/31/2005 10:48:42 AM PDT by
Toddsterpatriot
(Everything should be made simple, because otherwise we'll confuse Paul.)
To: jb6
How many Mexicans would be pouring in if we hadn't signed NAFTA? You can't argue that it didn't create new jobs down there.
To: jb6
Well what about NAFTA? Isn't that a Free Trade Zone? And yet the Mexicans are pouring in at an even faster rate then ever. Exactly! The average Mexican isn't better off - their ongoing migration provides abundant testimony to that effect. Nor is the average American.
People forget that lower prices to consumers through free traitin' will surely result in lower incomes for producers. All producers, from the assembly line to the senior partner of an established law practice.
701 posted on
05/31/2005 11:08:26 AM PDT by
neutrino
(Globalization “is the economic treason that dare not speak its name.” (173))
To: jb6
What are the Mexicans producing that they can trade with us? What money is going into Mexico besides the money that legal and illegal immigrants are sending home?
755 posted on
05/31/2005 12:34:59 PM PDT by
Goodgirlinred
( GoodGirlInRed Four More Years!!!!!)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson