Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cicero's_son

There are several here who think they know more about the case than the jurors who sat through every shred of evidence. Their blind conviction will not allow them to believe that the right verdict may have been made.


1,466 posted on 06/13/2005 2:27:22 PM PDT by Texaggie79 (Did I just say that?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1420 | View Replies ]


To: Texaggie79

Hey, pass me the vaseline.


1,539 posted on 06/13/2005 2:32:21 PM PDT by Feiny (I consider you guys my friends, I'm not wrong am I?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1466 | View Replies ]

To: Texaggie79

Yes and no.

Out here the transcripts are available, so they can be read and re-read. OTOH, the jury saw the witnesses in living color. MJ may well have (read probably) did molest someone. The question before the jury is did he molest this someone and hold him and his family captive at a mall. You can't convict on 'he's probably done this sometime'.


1,552 posted on 06/13/2005 2:33:35 PM PDT by Jaded (Hell sometimes has fluorescent lighting and a trumpet.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1466 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson