[shellshocked]

"And of course a crime has only occurred if it is later proven in court."


The only crime here is you people wanting him to be found guilty never followed the actual testimony and are riding an emotional wave of "For the children".

The woman who initially brought these charges has a history of trying to sue high profile people and companies.

The DA was eaten alive by a simple cross-examination by Jackson's attorney.

If the case was soooo easy to know Jackson was guilty, there would be no way to not find him guilty.

[Petronski]

If the case was soooo easy to know Jackson was guilty, there would be no way to not find him guilty.

Silly comment. You know very little.

Good cases are lost all the time.

[Checkers]

"If the case was soooo easy to know Jackson was guilty, there would be no way to not find him guilty."

Two words: OH JAY

[tomkat]

You're a fool.

[mhking]

The only crime here is you people wanting him to be found guilty never followed the actual testimony and are riding an emotional wave of "For the children".

Try it again.

I'll agree that DA Tom Sneddon was so wrapped up in trying to nail Jackson that he grabbed a piss-poor case to do it with; but let's face it. The mother was an idiot who has a background of trying to go after money. The JCPenney case that she was wrapped up in several years ago showed that.

Michael Jackson is a freak. And the mother in this case needs to have her head examined, if not getting charged with child endangerment herself.

Any parent who would dare even think about letting their child go anywhere near that freak needs to be strung up.

Jackson will screw the pooch (as it were) again one day. And I hope that he gets caught with his pants down and gets nailed to the wall.

All that being said, people wanting him to be found guilty is no "crime," to use your wording.

[SamAdams76]

I agree with you and will share in the beating you are taking. MJ's accusers were grifters and scam-artists. No doubt that MJ is a very strange guy with traits and habits characteristic of a pedophile, but not only were the witnesses against him not trustworthy but the DA did an awful job prosecuting this case and simply did not establish MJ's guilt beyond a shadow of a doubt.

In our system, it is better for the guilty to go free than for the innocent to be convicted. That is the choice the jury had before them.

[Checkers]

"The only crime here is you people wanting him to be found guilty never followed the actual testimony and are riding an emotional wave of "For the children"."

The only crime?


Oh Re-ally.