Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush invokes 9/11 in Iraq war
Washington Times ^ | Wednesday, June 29, 2005 | By Joseph Curl

Posted on 06/29/2005 12:40:54 AM PDT by JohnHuang2

FORT BRAGG, N.C. -- President Bush last night warned Americans not to forget the lessons of September 11, declaring that Iraq is the central front in the war on terror and asserting that finishing the military mission there "is vital to the future security of our country." "The only way our enemies can succeed is if we forget the lessons of September 11, if we abandon the Iraqi people to men like [Abu Musab] Zarqawi and if we yield the future of the Middle East to men like [Osama] bin Laden. For the sake of our nation's security, this will not happen on my watch," he told an audience of 750 troops at Fort Bragg. The president -- delivering a prime-time, televised speech at the home of the 82nd Airborne and Special Operations Forces -- acknowledged the "horrifying" TV pictures of death and violence that Americans see each day. But in his 28-minute speech, he asked and answered a rhetorical question -- one that polls show is on the minds of many Americans. "Amid all the violence, I know Americans ask the question: Is it worth it? It is worth it, and it is vital to the security of our country," he said. Mr. Bush said he thinks that despite polls showing Americans are losing confidence in the war, "the American people do not falter under threat, and we will not allow our future to be determined by car bombers and assassins."

(Excerpt) Read more at washtimes.com ...


TOPICS: Front Page News; News/Current Events
KEYWORDS: bush43; iraq
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

1 posted on 06/29/2005 12:40:54 AM PDT by JohnHuang2
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
Mr. Bush said he thinks that despite polls showing Americans are losing confidence in the war

How odd............... to even find the need to listen to numbers from questionable polls whose results are from the responses of ill-informed and propagandized citizens. What a joke. For God's sake, how many polls was anyone concerned over during WWII?

****

The old Dem./liberal/socialist media is America's most ruthless, relentless, and destructive enemy.

2 posted on 06/29/2005 12:52:12 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

Have you observed that on any given day, on any given poll, you can get a dffiernt result? I guess it depends on how they ask the question and where they ask it.


3 posted on 06/29/2005 1:00:49 AM PDT by Americanexpat (A strong democracy through citizen oversight.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

The President should have made the connection between the FIRST WTC bombing and Iraq. Repeated the fact that Iraq was on the list of Terrorist sponsoring nations for years. And gone on to say...." So was Syria, which is why we started bombing them 5 minutes ago."


4 posted on 06/29/2005 1:01:34 AM PDT by TomasUSMC (FIGHT LIKE WW2, FINISH LIKE WW2. FIGHT LIKE NAM, FINISH LIKE NAM.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat

"Have you observed that on any given day, on any given poll, you can get a dffiernt result? I guess it depends on how they ask the question and where they ask it."

Yep. And, unfortunately during the summer, most Americans aren't paying any attention at all to events. Of course, libs don't pay any attention any time, if it goes against their superior thinking process. Hehehe....


5 posted on 06/29/2005 2:56:09 AM PDT by BillyCrockett
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

MMMMMMmmmmm! That sure felt good to read....


6 posted on 06/29/2005 3:00:34 AM PDT by RandallFlagg (Roll your own cigarettes! You'll save $$$ and smoke less!(Magnetic bumper stickers-click my name)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat
Have you observed that on any given day, on any given poll

There is a lot to be learned from history and what a president actually says in a speech. The important question is why did he say what he said.

Click here for the 'tator take on the Democrats Speech Defect

I would urge all of us to remember that the President is student of history. He works very hard to do things that work while avoiding the mistakes of the past.

7 posted on 06/29/2005 3:07:04 AM PDT by Common Tator
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
tator: A point you bring up troubles me. The President and his staff words of are expressed in ways that paint mental pictures that often don't match the exact wording. For example, the Wash Times piece ties the war in Iraq to the crashes on 9/11. But there is a subtlety. We are in Iraq now to fight terrorism in their territory, but the picture being painted is that somehow Iraq was involved in 9/11. That debate is very nebulous and that debate will forever be ongoing. But the fact remains without directly saying it, he ties Iraq to involvement in 9/11 through the use of words that paint the mental picture. However as long as the hard connect is never made, then the deniablility is there. That's troubling.

Reagan used words to paint pictures too. But his pictures were rooted in hard fact. Not so with this administration. They've almost got the speak of "depends on what the meaning of the word is is" to an art.

8 posted on 06/29/2005 3:19:35 AM PDT by joesbucks
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Americanexpat
Have you observed that on any given day, on any given poll, you can get a different result? I guess it depends on how they ask the question and where they ask it.

.......... yes, and I heard yesterday and previously that over 60% of people called to be polled hang up, they do not want to take part (in the charade). Who do you think most of those "unwilling" are? They're people with a LIFE............... Republicans for the most part!

Polls are exceedingly meaningless and destructive, and should be confined to asking people what their favorite laundry detergent and breakfast cereal are!

9 posted on 06/29/2005 4:01:55 AM PDT by beyond the sea (No more legitimate hearing room ever again, Conyers......... to the broom closet ! ;-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: joesbucks

".....as long as the hard connect is never made....."

Joes, the connection is there for me in a very personal way. During the last three years of the Clinton administration my son had seven deployments to Turkey (Northern no-fly zone) and Saudi Arabia (Southern no-fly zone). These flights were to keep Saddam under control. A very scary time...especially when Clinton launched his four day war,Desert Fox.

Shortly after 9/11, Osama Bin Laden said one of his "reasons" for the attack was to get the infidels (US) out of Saudi Arabia because it is home to the Muslim holy place of Mecca. Very soon thereafter we removed our base from Saudi and prepared to stop the nonsense once and for all in Iraq.





10 posted on 06/29/2005 4:13:12 AM PDT by chgomac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies]

To: TomasUSMC

Great line, Tom!


11 posted on 06/29/2005 4:20:52 AM PDT by HighWheeler (Difference between a democRAT and a battery: At least a battery has a positive side.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: chgomac
Very soon thereafter we removed our base from Saudi and prepared to stop the nonsense once and for all in Iraq.

We removed our bases from Saudi Arabia because the Saudi's requested that we remove them.

12 posted on 06/29/2005 4:22:15 AM PDT by Non-Sequitur
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur

What was their reason for asking? I suspect that our presence there was an irritant to most Muslims....not just Osama, and yet the Saudis & Kuwaitis wanted & needed help in containing Saddam.

How could we protect the Southern no-fly zone without the Sultan base?


13 posted on 06/29/2005 4:28:12 AM PDT by chgomac
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Non-Sequitur
We removed our bases from Saudi Arabia because the Saudi's requested that we remove them

Do you really think we would have left without protecting the people in the no fly zones?

Actually, it's the idiots in SA who demanded we leave that created the need to take out Saddam. Millions of Iraqis would have been slaughtered if we left them unprotected, and millions of Kuwaitis would have followed after that. The Saudis would have come next.

14 posted on 06/29/2005 4:34:20 AM PDT by McGavin999
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 12 | View Replies]

To: Common Tator
"I would urge all of us to remember that the President is student of history...."

And history is very clear on what happens to nations who are not willing to fight for the ideals they embrace....
15 posted on 06/29/2005 4:37:43 AM PDT by PigRigger (Send donations to http://www.AdoptAPlatoon.org)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: beyond the sea

"For God's sake, how many polls was anyone concerned over during WWII?"

Better yet, who was demanding a timetable for pull out?


16 posted on 06/29/2005 5:08:08 AM PDT by Smartaleck
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2

The libs and Dems have been imagining that Bush said Iraq was directly responsible for 9/11. They've been dreaming it for so long, they think the echo in their head is real.


Case in point
http://www.news-record.com/news/now/bushspeech_062905.htm


17 posted on 06/29/2005 5:15:44 AM PDT by AppyPappy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: chgomac
During the last three years of the Clinton administration my son had seven deployments to Turkey (Northern no-fly zone) and Saudi Arabia (Southern no-fly zone). These flights were to keep Saddam under control. A very scary time...

How many of our planes were shot down?

Shortly after 9/11, Osama Bin Laden said one of his "reasons" for the attack was to get the infidels (US) out of Saudi Arabia because it is home to the Muslim holy place of Mecca. Very soon thereafter we removed our base from Saudi and prepared to stop the nonsense once and for all in Iraq.

By what logic do you interpret that scenario as one of strategic wisdom rather than moral timidity?

18 posted on 06/29/2005 5:24:08 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: JohnHuang2
"The only way our enemies can succeed is if we forget the lessons of September 11, if we abandon the Iraqi people to men like [Abu Musab] Zarqawi and if we yield the future of the Middle East to men like [Osama] bin Laden.

GWB's got chutzpah, you gotta give him that.

19 posted on 06/29/2005 5:29:47 AM PDT by iconoclast (Conservative, not partisan!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: iconoclast

How can anyone not think that Iraq is not connected to 9/11. AlQaeda is all over our own country a majority of Muslims knew about 9/11 beforehand and yet people believe that Iraq had no AlQaeda or no connection? I kept the news off this morning. They are going to hash and rehash a dam 1/2 speech for the next week. I just can't stand it anymore.


20 posted on 06/29/2005 5:40:20 AM PDT by angcat
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-57 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson