To: photogirl
Their website now indicates that the dog never existed, that this was all a publicity stunt to raise awareness for child safety.
46 posted on
08/12/2005 5:20:35 AM PDT by
Tennessee_Bob
("Nac Mac Feegle! The Wee Free Men! Nae king! Nae quin! Nae laird! We willna be fooled again!")
To: Tennessee_Bob
Kind of... they say it was a stunt to raise awareness for child safety. Then they tell you to go adopt a dog, so it's also a stunt to raise awareness of homeless animals. But they also say they would never dream of hurting an animal, they both own dogs, so it's a stunt to raise awareness of animal cruelty. At the end, they say it's meant to propel the show. So it's a stunt to raise awareness of themselves. This much is probably true.
50 posted on
08/12/2005 5:24:48 AM PDT by
crail
(Better lives have been lost on the gallows than have ever been enshrined in the halls of palaces.)
To: Tennessee_Bob
Their website now indicates that the dog never existed, that this was all a publicity stunt to raise awareness for child safety.Well, then I guess it was ok to do that, since it was "for the children" /sarcasm off
66 posted on
08/12/2005 6:00:51 AM PDT by
Born Conservative
("If not us, who? And if not now, when? - Ronald Reagan)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson