Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Clemenza

So you believe in...what? The theory of willy-nillyism? Accidental everything?

How sad for you.

And how ignorant you will appear in a few years. Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design, by that or several other names which mean the same thing.


35 posted on 08/18/2005 5:32:21 PM PDT by MizSterious (Now, if only we could convince them all to put on their bomb-vests and meet in Mecca...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies ]


To: MizSterious
Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design, by that or several other names which mean the same thing.

Do you have references for this claim?
40 posted on 08/18/2005 5:34:06 PM PDT by Dimensio (http://angryflower.com/bobsqu.gif <-- required reading before you use your next apostrophe!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design

Really? Care to back up that assertion?

41 posted on 08/18/2005 5:34:20 PM PDT by curiosity (.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious

ID has never stood up to the scientific method. ID's proponents should be viewed as seriously as alchemists and baseball card economists.


48 posted on 08/18/2005 5:36:46 PM PDT by Clemenza (Pirro is Hillary with an (R))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
"Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design, by that or several other names which mean the same thing."

You are wrong. ID says the laws of physics are insufficient to govern the world. Science has not found that to be the case, even in the very least. The proponents of ID are charlitan preachers, not scientists.

63 posted on 08/18/2005 5:41:40 PM PDT by spunkets
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
"Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design, by that or several other names which mean the same thing."

No, actually they are not. The only difference is that the ID'ers are getting more press since they have organized and started making noises like scientists (despite the absolute non-scientific nature of ID).

69 posted on 08/18/2005 5:43:55 PM PDT by Wonder Warthog (The Hog of Steel)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design,

Do you think anyone here believes that lie?

127 posted on 08/18/2005 6:27:10 PM PDT by shuckmaster
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

To: MizSterious
And how ignorant you will appear in a few years. Most of the scientific community is actually moving toward intelligent design, by that or several other names which mean the same thing.

Intelligent design is not science, it is religion. Any scientist that believes in it to the exclusion of evolution is a crackpot and the anti-Darwin conservatives would be wise to shape up and not act like religious loons.

507 posted on 08/19/2005 3:12:57 AM PDT by youthgonewild
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson