[MNJohnnie]

Ultimately it comes down to them arrogantly declaring supreme knowledge of how the universe works and deducing that because they can't work out the natural processes required for certain events to occur, an intelligent agent must be responsible.

And this differs from the arrogant declaration that "Science" proves "Evolution" is a "Fact" how?

[From many - one.]

The second statement is not a reflection of what scientists think.

The first is an accurate statement of what IDers claim.

I say claim rather than think because I do not trust the moonies intentions

[Dimensio]

And this differs from the arrogant declaration that "Science" proves "Evolution" is a "Fact" how?

Well, I for one acknowledge that no explanations in science are "proven". Got something that isn't a strawman?