Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

OPINION: San Francisco Declares Itself a Military-Free Zone
San Francisco Chronicle ^ | 8/24/5 | Cinnamon Stillwell

Posted on 08/24/2005 5:47:20 AM PDT by SmithL

Everyone knows that San Francisco is a focal point for anti-war sentiment. Protests, civil disobedience and other acts designed to show opposition to the war in Iraq are standard fare in these parts. But now it seems that San Francisco anti-war activists have taken their opposition to the war in Iraq a step further.

Not content with simply protesting the war, they've trained their sights on all things military. In an apparent effort to rid the city of any semblance of its military history, various leftist groups, and even some city officials, are trying to erase the military's presence altogether. In short, San Francisco has declared itself a military-free zone.

Following on the heels of their success in sometimes violently shutting down job fairs that include military recruiters on college campuses, the counterrecruitment

movement is now looking to broaden its influence. Instead of merely protesting the existence of military recruiters on campuses, the movement wants to ban them altogether. Proposition I, a measure that will be on the ballot this November, seeks to do just that.

Put together by a group called College Not Combat, the initiative of the same name talks tough on the surface. But it doesn't have any teeth. The nonbinding measure simply asks that individual schools and colleges consider banning military recruiters and denying recruiters access to their student directories, which would violate section 9258 of the No Child Left Behind Act. In the process, these schools could very well have to forgo federal funds. Given that such institutions are unlikely to want to get off the federal gravy train, it's doubtful they will choose to take this action.

(Excerpt) Read more at sfgate.com ...


TOPICS: Business/Economy; Culture/Society; Editorial; Government; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections; US: California
KEYWORDS: antimilitary; sanctuaryfrancisco; ussiowa; wankers
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last
To: shadeaud
Does mean San Francisco is now vulnerable to an attack from the rear

There should be a RULE against using the words San Francisco and attack from the rear in the same sentence. Or even the same paragraph!
21 posted on 08/24/2005 6:13:03 AM PDT by TennCon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: nwrep

Alright...but only if I can watch. *

(* obligatory Monty Python reference)


22 posted on 08/24/2005 6:14:04 AM PDT by Uncle Vlad
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Bump for later reading


23 posted on 08/24/2005 6:16:30 AM PDT by Live free or die
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: William Creel

"We should just allow SF to declare itself a city state, so we no longer have to deal with them."

Exactly!
No more federal funding. No federal buildings. Cut all ties and wait for the Chinese to come take the place. Those homos will love the Chinese I'm sure.


24 posted on 08/24/2005 6:18:59 AM PDT by brownsfan (It's not a war on terror... it's a war with islam.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: 3IDVET
Put a border around em and let em rot in hell. Of course then we would have another border issue with people trying to get out.

There was a study posted here maybe two weeks ago that reported that the biggest ultra-commie cities -- SF, Boston, Seattle -- are becoming relatively childless. The reason in SF at least is that anybody that is normal in any way is moving out already.

25 posted on 08/24/2005 6:19:37 AM PDT by jiggyboy (Ten percent of poll respondents are either lying or insane)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: TennCon

They'll probably form their own little militia, of course with the slogan, "never leave your buddy's behind"


26 posted on 08/24/2005 6:20:50 AM PDT by highnoon (If it can be fixed with money, it's not really a problem.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

Good, pull out all military funding, close all bases in that area, cut funds to the universities, stop federal funding for roads, and anything else they rely on government funding for survival.

Better yet, lets storm the city and drive the fruit cakes into the ocean.


27 posted on 08/24/2005 6:24:24 AM PDT by TheForceOfOne (The alternative media is our Enigma machine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

The USN needs to move its SF "Fleet Week" down to Long Beach.

Of course, that may slow down business at the bath houses...sorry, couldn't resist!


28 posted on 08/24/2005 6:25:48 AM PDT by silverleaf (Fasten your seat belts- it's going to be a BUMPY ride.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

I'm sure the camel jockeys will be happy to hear that San Francissyco is a military-free zone.
Just to don't come crying for help when the place goes up in smoke...again!

Semper Fi,
Kelly


29 posted on 08/24/2005 6:30:51 AM PDT by kellynla (U.S.M.C. 1st Battalion,5th Marine Regiment, 1st Marine Div. Viet Nam 69&70 Semper Fi)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dblshot

Go to link for a report on the last visit to San Francisco by the submarine bearing its name.

USS SAN FRANCISCO (SSN 711) builds close relationship with namesake city

http://www.csp.navy.mil/news/rel0105.html


30 posted on 08/24/2005 6:35:10 AM PDT by rwa265 (I was blind, now I see)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: rwa265

San Fran is not a focal point. It is a FECAL point.


31 posted on 08/24/2005 6:37:49 AM PDT by DogBarkTree
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
Probably the most blatant example of San Francisco's anti-military bias was displayed last month by the city's Board of Supervisors when they voted 3-8 against docking the WWII/Korean War-era USS Iowa as a floating museum at the Port of San Francisco.

Wait a second... it's big, hard, and full of seamen, and San Francisco DOESN'T want it??

32 posted on 08/24/2005 6:40:38 AM PDT by steve-b (A desire not to butt into other people's business is eighty percent of all human wisdom)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Guenevere
Fine....so we can just ignore them if we're ever invaded, right?

Sorry. No. What's worse than fighting there to defend their sorry butts because they won't is to have to defend them as refuges in our towns. Whatever it takes to keep the lib cowards in SF is the best.

33 posted on 08/24/2005 6:45:46 AM PDT by Hillarys Gate Cult
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
...Not content with simply protesting the war, they've trained their sights on all things military...

Never believe hardcore leftwing vermin when they say, "I support the troops, but...".

34 posted on 08/24/2005 6:46:59 AM PDT by Oldeconomybuyer (The democRATS are near the tipping point.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rummyfan

O'Reilly had one of the city council members on his show a few nights ago talking about them voting to keep the USS Iowa out of SF.

O'Reilly flat out asked him why. The liberal lying coward kept trying to make it sound like it was "economic" issues that forced them to vote no. He said, "My grandfather served in WW2." in some half-hearted attempt to say he has respect for the military.
O'Reilly pulled out the fact that every place where a ship of this importantance is displayed, it turns a profit. Especially with the amount of tourists that flock to SF's waterfront areas, it would probably end up being a very profitable venture for the city.
After more pushing, the guy admited that it was not an economic matter, but they voted against it as a protest against the iraq war! Right on national tv!


35 posted on 08/24/2005 6:53:39 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SmithL

And I hope all veterans, military, retirees and their family and friends make San Francisco off limits for vacations, and meeting places.


36 posted on 08/24/2005 6:56:29 AM PDT by ONETWOONE (onetwoone)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Proud_USA_Republican
There is a fundamental problem with all of these "nuclear free zones" which are ordinances passed by local municipalities. The problem in a nutshell is that North Korea and China are totally unaware of any american city ordinance.

Additionally when China or North Korea drop an ICBM on San Francisco, there will not be anyone left in city hall to write up a proper ticket and fine those waskilly Commies.

37 posted on 08/24/2005 6:58:32 AM PDT by One_who_hopes_to_know
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]

To: shadeaud
Does mean San Francisco is now vulnerable to an attack from the rear?

LOL, best line of the day. It's obvious that San Franciscans use their anal cavities for more than just sex, apparently that is where a lot of their thinking originates.

38 posted on 08/24/2005 6:59:21 AM PDT by AxelPaulsenJr (Pray Daily For Our Troops and President Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SmithL
BOR had a city counsel member on his show regarding their rejection of the Iowa. His main claim for why they did it was economic and that it would cost the city too much money and wouldn't generate the tourism or revenue some claimed. Also, he is against the Iraq war.

BOR told the guy that if it was guaranteed to never cost SF a dime he and the others would still be against the Iowa coming to town because they are anti-military and thats the real reason they rejected the Iowa. The guests smirk and non-response was a solid indication that BOR nailed him. Economics had nothing to do with it.

39 posted on 08/24/2005 7:22:30 AM PDT by Phantom Lord (Fall on to your knees for the Phantom Lord)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: jiggyboy

I live in Seattle and can back this up. Seattle is become a childless city. The outlying suburbs are where all the childbirths are happening.

This city really is at a crossroads with the liberals doing everything possible to drive companies like Boeing out thinking that all that tax revenue and jobs can be made up via dot com companies and higher taxes.
The governor's election fiasco up here was a major wake up call to the people of this city. It also shows that a big part of the problem is that soo many liberal californians have moved up here and brought their idiot politics with them. Its amazing when you talk to them and you hear them bitch about why they left California (cost of living, crime, illegals, price fixing policies leading to shortages, etc), but then they run out and vote for the same liberal type of democrats that destroyed California.
Your starting to see monthly newspapers popping up that are extremely communist/socialist biased in all the coffee shops. There is a an artist/hippie section of Seattle called Freemont where they have a statue of lenin displayed that they bought from Russia. I've met some Russian people who have immigrated here recently and they said they were absolutely sickened when they saw this.


40 posted on 08/24/2005 7:26:15 AM PDT by Proud_USA_Republican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-85 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson