Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Amid GOP divide on immigration, White House moves toward new plan
AP ^ | 8/27/05 | RON FOURNIER

Posted on 08/27/2005 10:23:56 AM PDT by GOPGuide

PHOENIX - Struggling to pacify his party's warring wings, President Bush is moving toward allowing illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. before February 2004 to qualify for guest-worker visas. People smuggled in after then would be deported.

State leaders in Arizona and New Mexico have stepped up pressure on the Bush administration and the Republican-led Congress to better police U.S. borders and deal with an estimated 10 million people who are living illegally in this country.

"They're trying to split the baby," Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., said of the White House plan, "and I don't think they can do that."

Bush and his advisers are caught between their supporters in the business sector, who believe the economy needs those workers, and conservatives whose priority is to clamp down on illegal immigration. The White House hopes to have a detailed proposal to Congress in late September or early October.

McCain, who ran against Bush for the 2000 GOP nomination and may seek the White House in 2008, is sponsoring a bill with Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass., that would create 400,000 three-year visas for guest workers. The legislation has the flexibility to add more in the future and would let undocumented workers stay in the U.S. while they apply.

A competing plan by Sen. Jon Kyl, R-Ariz., would create two-year visas and require that guest workers and illegal immigrants leave the U.S. before they can apply for the chance to work legally in the country.

Conservative House Republicans tend to favor Kyl's tougher approach. McCain mocks it.

"Turn yourself in so we can send you back to Mexico," said McCain, throwing his head back in laughter during an interview at his Arizona office last week. "It's not going to happen."

The White House seems to agree with McCain.

According to administration and congressional officials who took part in a series of White House meetings this summer, Bush does not favor requiring illegal immigrants to be sent home to apply for the visas.

In a nod to his conservative base, however, the president has rejected a part of the McCain-Kennedy bill that the White House believes would put illegal immigrants on an automatic track to citizenship, the officials said.

The officials said it was unclear how many illegal immigrants came after February 2004 or how many later had children in the U.S., conferring U.S. citizenship on those babies. The White House wants to avoid a surge of illegal immigrants who would try to beat a prospective deadline, they said.

The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because the White House has not authorized them to discuss the policy, which is subject to change.

All sides agree that illegal immigration has become a national security, humanitarian and economic crisis:

_Intelligence agencies fear terrorists could slip into the U.S. through Mexico.

_Hundreds of illegal immigrants die each year while trying to enter the U.S. Those who make it often fall prey to criminals and opportunists.

_From construction companies in Arizona to farmers in the Midwest and California, many industries need those cheap and available workers.

"Just stop at one of these construction sites and look and see who those workers are. They're all Hispanic," McCain said. "And I bet you they're illegal."

Depending on how Hispanics react, this fall's immigration debate could help determine whether Democrats or Republicans dominate the fastest-growing voting bloc in years to come.

The issue threatens to divide Democrats. Affluent, well-educated liberals are embracing immigration as part of cultural diversity. But poor Democrats, including blacks, are wary of Hispanics' growing economic and political clout.

Democratic Gov. Janet Napolitano of Arizona, who supports the McCain-Kennedy bill, joined Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., this month in declaring immigration emergencies in their states. "We just kept waiting and waiting and waiting but never did see a sense of urgency from Washington," she said.

Voters are frustrated, too, especially in the Southwest, where illegal immigration is an unsettling fact of life.

"It's sad to see Democrats doing what Republicans ought to be doing," Danielle Taylor, 24, a Republican voter in Scottsdale, said during a break from her bank job. "Napolitano may have just earned my vote."

McCain faced tough questions at a town hall meeting Thursday night in Mesa, where conservatives accused him of going soft on illegal immigrants. "No amnesty!" some shouted.

McCain says his bill does not provide amnesty. Conservatives say no better word describes allowing illegal immigrants to remain in the U.S.

Bush may face similar criticism. McCain, Napolitano and other supporters of guest workers argue that it is unrealistic to deport 11 million people.

McCain's bill would require the undocumented workers to register with the government, pay all back taxes and a $2,000 fine, then go through a series of background checks and work at least six years before applying for a green card.

The senator said he is willing to stiffen those requirements. The White House plan probably will have its own.

The White House may take the unusual step of writing the legislation or submitting specific language to Congress.


TOPICS: Extended News; News/Current Events; Politics/Elections
KEYWORDS: 2006; 2008; aliens; amnesty; bush43; fournier; gop; immigrantlist; immigration; immigrationplan; term2
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last
To: GOPGuide
..how many Republican Congressmen are willing to go down with Bush's collapsing poll numbers(?)..

This has to be our point of attack. Bush himself seems completely impervious to preventing the literal destruction of the US in it's current form, and seems completely unaware of the potential magnitude of the political fallout.

The House of Representatives is a different story. If they think this is an issue that can defeat or elect a Congressman/woman, they will break from Bush in a heartbeat.

41 posted on 08/27/2005 10:46:44 AM PDT by MrNatural ("...You want the truth!?...")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: moehoward
Has he read his own bill? It's every bit the knee-slapper.

You bet it is. He doesn't think they will turn themselves in to be deported, but some how he thinks they will step forward and pay a 2K fine and back taxes??? BWAHAHAHAHAHAHA. Silly man. He's gotta go.

42 posted on 08/27/2005 10:46:56 AM PDT by planekT (No fence, no vote.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: Happy2BMe

Right here. See RE:#27.


43 posted on 08/27/2005 10:46:56 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
The White House may take the unusual step of writing the legislation or submitting specific language to Congress.

The failed President of Mexico, Vicente Fox, will dictate the legislation, of course.

GWBush and those who came before him, with the help of traitors in Congress, have sold America out.

44 posted on 08/27/2005 10:47:26 AM PDT by janetgreen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad
The primary reason for the 2nd Amendment!
45 posted on 08/27/2005 10:47:37 AM PDT by Roccus (I've been described as a cynical romantic. Also a romantic cynic.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: Uncle Vlad

"I'm afraid he was right."


No need to be afraid, I'm proud to see that so many people are willing to toss partisanship aside in favor of doing the right thing.


46 posted on 08/27/2005 10:47:37 AM PDT by cripplecreek (If you must obey your party, may your chains rest lightly upon your shoulders.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
"From construction companies in Arizona to farmers in the Midwest and California, many industries need those cheap and available workers."

Problem is they are Illegal immigrants because they can be fired on the spot with no recourses. Americans need not apply.

My brother is a crew chief and will not hire Americans. Plenty apply but all for naught. If he hires them they want raises for good work, they want extra pay for jobs far away, but worse of all if he fires them they oft times sue.

With the Mexicans he just fires them when they stop working hard or injury themselves. Where as an American gets workers comp.

These are Jobs Americans would love to have but have no chance at. They paid over $20 / hour until they were all replaced with Illegals. Now they par $10 / hour.

Make these illegals legal and they will also demand more money, sue when fired and demand workers comp. At least Americans will then have a chance of getting a job and the wages will go up.

By the way even though wages are way down home cost way more. Only the big companies make more money off these illegals. The taxpayers and everyone else gets soaked.
47 posted on 08/27/2005 10:47:48 AM PDT by ImphClinton (Four More Years Go Bush)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: cripplecreek
The media attaches all things to the war in Iraq but personally I think the plummeting approval ratings are a combination of things.

It is more than just Iraq. In January 2004 when Bush first proposed this lunacy his poll ratings sunk 10 points overnight. People are aware of this issue more than he and Congress think and will not forget so easily by 2006.

48 posted on 08/27/2005 10:48:11 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Bush and his advisers are caught between their supporters in the business sector, who believe the economy needs those workers, ...

These are not ordinary, legal 'workers', these are illegal aliens.

Make that sentence "Bush and his advisers are caught between their supporters in the business sector, who believe the economy needs these illegal workers, ..." to see how absurd this sounds. American businesses do not need to be breaking the law to hire these illegals, and the president should not be proposing ways for businesses to profit from their illegal activities.

The president, as the head of the executive, should be enforcing our immigration laws against those who are blatantly flouting them by sneaking across our borders and those who are encouraging them by hiring them (and those who are now trying to encourage them to buy homes with mortgage money that largely comes from the GSEs.)

49 posted on 08/27/2005 10:48:11 AM PDT by snowsislander
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

i used to think Bush was laying a nice path for conservatives to the future. it's been looking a bit more rocky lately

he has a profound disconnect on immigration...really incredible....one day, if the existing American culture is not completely subjugated, academics will talk about this:

"he was great on foreign policy and strong when American needed it, he tried to institute some tax reforms and a wee bit of cultural conservatism and had some successes but he ignored illegal immigration back when there was still a chance to do something about it."


50 posted on 08/27/2005 10:48:36 AM PDT by wardaddy (dixie deadhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

i used to think Bush was laying a nice path for conservatives to the future. it's been looking a bit more rocky lately

he has a profound disconnect on immigration...really incredible....one day, if the existing American culture is not completely subjugated, academics will talk about this:

"he was great on foreign policy and strong when American needed it, he tried to institute some tax reforms and a wee bit of cultural conservatism and had some successes but he ignored illegal immigration back when there was still a chance to do something about it."


51 posted on 08/27/2005 10:49:04 AM PDT by wardaddy (dixie deadhead)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

Comment #52 Removed by Moderator

To: GOPGuide
...White House moves toward new plan

Does this mean they are admitting that whats been going on for the last five years was part of a plan?

53 posted on 08/27/2005 10:52:18 AM PDT by FreePaul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: agitator

My question is how do we determine if an ilegal was here before or after 2-04?? What a joke.

"Si Senior I was hereo beforo 2owo 4 owo""


54 posted on 08/27/2005 10:53:12 AM PDT by superiorslots (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: prion
What wing of the Republican Party is pro illegal immigration?!

I'd consider Jim Kolbe, Jeff Flake and Chris Cannon to be part of the cheap labor wing of the GOP.

55 posted on 08/27/2005 10:53:30 AM PDT by Reaganwuzthebest
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: GOPGuide
Struggling to pacify his party's warring wings, President Bush is moving toward allowing illegal immigrants who came to the U.S. before February 2004 to qualify for guest-worker visas.

Funny, I don't feel pacified. I feel p!ssed-off.

We're being sold out and the only ones who are even bothering to attempt to address the issue are the frickin' Democrats for pity's sake!

If this crap keeps up, we may as well kiss the White House and the Congress goodbye in 2008.

56 posted on 08/27/2005 10:54:10 AM PDT by Prime Choice (E=mc^3. Don't drink and derive.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: inquest

Quote: If the economy needs immigrant workers, then they can come here legally.

But then big business will have to pay workers comp, SS, etc


57 posted on 08/27/2005 10:55:04 AM PDT by superiorslots (Free Traitors are communist China's modern day "Useful Idiots")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies]

To: prion
>>>>What wing of the Republican Party is pro illegal immigration?!

The GOP-people oppose illegal immigration and amnesty.

It's the majority of GOP politicos who are pro-illegal immigration.

58 posted on 08/27/2005 10:55:13 AM PDT by Reagan Man (Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: prion
The US Senate and the NYT run this country, not the President.

And both of these orgs are elitists snobs who are drunk with power, and for 40 years have been firmly entrenched.

Since the Pres seems to sign every bill that comes out of the legislators, ie the peoples body, then it is up to us to pressure the Senate, and demand they ignore their puppet-masters in the press.
59 posted on 08/27/2005 10:56:38 AM PDT by roses of sharon
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 39 | View Replies]

To: superiorslots
Wouldn't they have to do that anyway once the illegals are "legalized"?
60 posted on 08/27/2005 10:56:54 AM PDT by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 57 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-4041-6061-80 ... 121-124 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson