1 posted on
09/05/2005 4:39:35 AM PDT by
TomGuy
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
To: TomGuy
2 posted on
09/05/2005 4:40:23 AM PDT by
mewzilla
(Property must be secured or liberty cannot exist. John Adams)
To: TomGuy
Hmmm....not sure what I think of this. I think I'd prefer Scalia be moved up. Should be interesting.
3 posted on
09/05/2005 4:40:54 AM PDT by
tsmith130
To: TomGuy
I thought that's what I heard Kirin say.
4 posted on
09/05/2005 4:41:21 AM PDT by
tiredoflaundry
(In Tampa Bay praying for all In Katrina's path.)
To: TomGuy
Windell Golar, FoxNews, confirms Roberts to be nominated for CJ position.
6 posted on
09/05/2005 4:41:55 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
If Fox would replace that guy in the middle with Megyn Kendall, I submit that their ratings would triple.
To: TomGuy
Streamer on Foxnews.com: President Bush to Address the Nation at 8:01 a.m. EDT
No details on the topic. Earlier speculation by the FoxNews talkies was Katrina. Now, topic could be CJ replacement announcement.
9 posted on
09/05/2005 4:45:09 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
I know it doesnt matter what I think, but we dont know enough about Roberts to place him in the top job for life. If he is appointed we have him for maybe 40 years. Thats too long for someone we dont know that much about.
To: TomGuy
Roberts has continually been compared to Rehnquist.
I would have preferred Scalia but not a bad idea considering the thought of a third confirmation.
12 posted on
09/05/2005 4:46:27 AM PDT by
Republican Red
(''Van der Sloot" is Dutch for ''Kennedy.")
To: TomGuy
Just reported on C-SPAN. Prez to go Live in about 30 minutes.
To: TomGuy
Wish I was more comfortable with him. I'm not sure that this is not expediency over quality
17 posted on
09/05/2005 4:48:07 AM PDT by
WillMalven
(It don't matter where you are when "the bomb" goes off, as long as you can say "What was that?")
To: TomGuy
Hat's off man you're fast! Works for me I like John Roberts.
19 posted on
09/05/2005 4:48:57 AM PDT by
defconw
(ALLEN IN 08+Levin for Senate!)
To: TomGuy
Ouch. Bush is going to take the heat for not promoting from within.
sw
20 posted on
09/05/2005 4:49:03 AM PDT by
spectre
(Spectre's wife (50,000 refugees to AR)
To: TomGuy
Could someone explain why this matters so much. It's not like the Chief Justice gets two votes. As far as I'm concerned, make Ginsburg Chief and nominate a Scalia-like replacement for Rehnquist's spot. Makes it look like Bush "compromised."
This is a simple solution, so I'm sure it's wrong somehow. Someone please explain why.
22 posted on
09/05/2005 4:50:04 AM PDT by
Scarchin
(www.classdismissedblog.com.)
To: TomGuy
Here is a Yahoo news link for confirmation:
Bush to Nominate Roberts As Chief Justice
By JENNIFER LOVEN, Associated Press Writer 3 minutes ago
WASHINGTON - Moving swiftly, President Bush will nominate John Roberts to succeed William H. Rehnquist as chief justice, a senior administration source said Monday.
The president was to make the announcement in the Oval Office before leaving for another trip to the hurricane-battered Gulf Coast.
Bush met with Roberts at the White House on Sunday evening for about a half an hour and then offered him the top position at the Supreme Court on Monday morning, the administration official said, speaking on condition of anonymity because Bush had not announced his selection.
24 posted on
09/05/2005 4:50:47 AM PDT by
TomGuy
To: TomGuy
To: TomGuy
Should be Scalia... Not sure what to think of this.
27 posted on
09/05/2005 4:51:42 AM PDT by
The Mayor
( Pray as if everything depends on God; work as if everything depends on you.)
To: Socratic
Does anyone know if it is really true that all SC Justices wrote notes of condolence, or perhaps it was formal statements, concerning the death of Judge Rhenqiust; except Souter?
32 posted on
09/05/2005 4:53:38 AM PDT by
Socratic
(Liberal's motto: Capio ergo sum.)
To: TomGuy
The choice is up to President Bush. If he picks John Roberts for CJ, that's that. Now if Roberts turns out to be another William Rehnquist, conservatives have nothing to worry about.
34 posted on
09/05/2005 4:56:46 AM PDT by
Reagan Man
(Secure the borders;punish employers who hire illegals;halt all welfare handouts to illegals.)
To: TomGuy
39 posted on
09/05/2005 4:59:21 AM PDT by
nuconvert
(No More Axis of Evil by Christmas ! TLR) [there's a lot of bad people in the pistachio business])
To: TomGuy
This means several things:
1) Bush wants to appoint a woman or minority to the bench without making that person CJ.
2) Bush wants O'Connor to stay until both nominees are approved (her vacancy will now likely remain unfilled past the October 3rd start of the session)
3)Luttig will not be picked (he would have been picked for CJ if he was the guy)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-80, 81-84 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson