Posted on 09/10/2005 4:56:18 AM PDT by PatrickHenry
This has about as much value as what Kwame West thinks about Bush.
Your thoughts were foresaw by God and He inspired Paul to clear things up for us.
Rationalizations and excuses about why people disagree with you... How handy, especially when it avoids having to think about the real reasons.
There are far more reasons why billions of people find your "proof" unconvincing, beyond dismissive labeling such as "lies", "corruption", or "debasement". Claiming otherwise is a classic exampleo of the "Straw man fallacy".
"There are more things in heaven and earth, Horatio, Than are dreamt of in your philosophy."
-- Hamlet, Act 1 Scene 5, by William Shakespeare
That the plug was written by: --H. O'Billovich
A review of the book on Amazon.com. :-)
The possibility of mirror-matter is something taken seriously by some physicists, and some of what is printed on the site in your link looks valid; I have to say though, that there's some stuff in your link that looks fishy, though (i.e. the whole deal about the Tunguska explosion - just as easily explainable by an ordinary comet impact). Always remember, the web is an incredibly vast repository of information with zero quality control; always check the sources of info before taking it too seriously.
In any case, mirror matter is an interesting concept - it may well be real (though once again, I'm not an expert on this).
"My father woke me late one October night in 1957, bundled me up and brought me out to our front porch."
Same thing happened to me except it was a meteor that lit up the whole sky in a yellow glow and cast shadows inside our house.
:-)
A little of both, I think. While Einstein clearly did not believe in the idea of a "personified" God -- one that was conscious or had "plans" or anything like that -- it also doesn't seem entirely accurate to say that he used "God" as a label for "just nature".
I get the impression that he envisioned some sort of thing underlying nature as we know it, or beyond it in some way, which was not a "being" in any sense of thw word, but which imbued nature as we know it with order and complexity. That which provided our universe with its "spark of magic", if you will, which could be found if we pulled away the curtain of our own universe and looked behind it. Even if it was just a "metauniverse" of a kind, operating by its own supranatural (as opposed to "supernatural") laws which spun off our own, Einstein would consider it the "God" of our universe, the "prime mover", the source which was even more awe-inspiring than our already awe-inspiring "bubble" of a universe within the larger.
As always, your thoughts are succinct. We will not "discover" God simply by reading what others have written...we must experience Him.
Because we have retained the wonder and awe of our unique experiences, we are both that much closer to God.
Yes it is, and I first heard about it approximately 2 years ago. The gentleman who's site I included seem to be one with the most knowledge and I believe he has articles in a few journals. I know however that there are many crackpot sites and theories floating about on the Internet.
What intrigues me most is that if true, a mirror world might exist with all the implications that would mean.
Where have you been?
The Intelligent Design movement perfectly coincides with this passage of Scripture.
Rom 1:20 20 For since the creation of the world His invisible attributes are clearly seen, being understood by the things that are made, even His eternal power and Godhead, so that they are without excuse,
Thanks, I certainly feel a lot closer to God now after years of reading, and studying not only religious writings but also of the wonders of his creation. I never was able to make sense of the bible thumping preaching during my childhood.
I asked my Grandmother once, "Why would God need a rib from Adam to make Eve"? She almost had a heart attack! :-)
Deism seems to fit. "the Laws of Nature and of Nature's God," to use Jefferson's phrase. [His caps.]
Can you imagine submitting your perpetual motion machine model to that patent clerk?
I should have stated that it was a review of the book in my post. ;-)
I can certainly appreciate her reaction, for my Dad had a similar reaction upon learning that I believe in theistic evolution. It has taken years, but we've reached a resolution in that belief or disbelief in a literal six days of Creation is not a point of Salvation.
Perhaps farther down in the thread someone has already posted that Isaac Newton was a very devout Christian.
I have read that faith was so important to Newton that it guided his standards for seeking the truth in natural philosophy and to establishing practical technique and fact for civilization.
Many deep philosophers and scientists are guided by a humble approach to understanding the universe in scientific terms, in bowing their head in reverence that their investigations lead along a pathway to truth, even a glimpse of truth that shadows that which no one can ever know completely.
I am convinced God is of a higher dimension that we simply cannot sense within our own dimensional confines. For if could prove the existence of God, if we could gather 'physical' evidence of God's existence, then we would be aware of the hyperdimension of God's existence, and with that awareness we could elevate ourselves to be equal to God, which is impossible.
So, it's only for the lack of the Patriot Act, that Einsten remained in America.
Well. now I guess we know how you came to be.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.