Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MikeinIraq
besides they generally use .90 as the multiplier...

Yeah, I know, but for whatever reason they ain't doing it this time. I was doing the multiply by .9 thing and was getting it wrong. But then I remembered there being a reason why very strong hurricanes use the .85 multiplier. I don't remember the precise reason why .85 multiplier is used, but it may have something to do with the low pressuring making the standard flight level much lower.
1,358 posted on 09/21/2005 11:36:19 AM PDT by montanus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1337 | View Replies ]


To: montanus
Way too high of a multiplier.

Powell & Black studies of dropsonde and bouy data suggest that 63% to 73% to be much more reasonable ratios that what is popularly promulgated. NHC has often come under criticism with their wind speed estimates. However, in the case of hurricane Mitch (1998), the wind speed profile was unique. More recent studies done by Hock & Franklin using GPS based dropwindsonde in 1999, gave the first clear cut view of eyewall wind profile (with accuracy of 15' and 1-4MPH).

See: Eye Wall wind-profiles

1,419 posted on 09/21/2005 11:55:57 AM PDT by raygun
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies ]

To: montanus

well about 20 minutes later, the storm is now a CAT 5....

Dear God in Heaven....


1,884 posted on 09/21/2005 1:38:35 PM PDT by MikefromOhio (Hey Fox News, MORE MOLLY, LESS Greta van Talksoutthesideofhermouth)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1358 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson