Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: MadIvan

Ivan, I agree with you. HOWEVER, what I said before still goes. You say it must be overturned, I say it won't be overturned. You are stating an aim, while I am stating a fact. These are not necessarily in conflict.

Bst,
BF


157 posted on 10/07/2005 8:08:37 AM PDT by BagelFace
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 70 | View Replies ]


To: BagelFace
You say it must be overturned, I say it won't be overturned. You are stating an aim, while I am stating a fact.

A fact? We are prehaps one vote away from having the votes to overturn Roe. We are just one Presidential election and a couple of non-limp wristed Senators away from making your 'fact' fiction, IMHO.

159 posted on 10/07/2005 8:14:02 AM PDT by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

To: BagelFace; Always Right

BagelFace, the facts are that Roe was almost overturned in the 90's. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1093519/posts

With the Laci Peterson law and a ban on partial birth abortion, Roe is in bigger trouble than ever - especially if constructionalist judges sit on the court. The so-called right to "privacy" is not found anywhere in the constitution.

When Bush speaks of judges who will strictly interpret the constitution, pro-lifers should rejoice. Now let's hope he follows through...


166 posted on 10/07/2005 11:10:33 AM PDT by Mighty_Quinn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 157 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson