Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Bush: Judge Samuel Alito is new choice for Supreme Court nominee
Fox News ^

Posted on 10/31/2005 3:12:28 AM PST by kcvl

Per Fox News...


TOPICS: Breaking News; News/Current Events; US: New Jersey
KEYWORDS: alito; antoninscalia; billofrights; bush; catholic; civilrights; constitution; courts; judge; judges; judicialrestraint; justice; miers; newjersey; originalintent; presidentbush; rights; scalito; scotus; supremecourt; uusconstitution; whiningdems
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,901-1,920 next last
To: Stand Watch Listen

LOL! That's great! Thanks!


341 posted on 10/31/2005 4:18:29 AM PST by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 261 | View Replies]

To: drlevy88

Yes he does.

Has he learned his Miers lesson?


342 posted on 10/31/2005 4:18:35 AM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: dawn53
Otherwise, Bush's original plan for a "stealth" nominee will have seemed like the right plan.

I will never be in that camp. I abhor government by guess, and prefer a transparent decision making process, even (maybe especially) where I don't like the result.

343 posted on 10/31/2005 4:18:47 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 231 | View Replies]

To: irishjuggler
Harry Reid said that President Bush had better not pick Alito. Well, that would have been enough reason to pick him over anyone else!

Court nominee expected as early as today, Sen. Harry Reid of Nevada, the Democratic leader, warned President Bush yesterday not to pick Judge Samuel A. Alito Jr ...

344 posted on 10/31/2005 4:19:09 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 325 | View Replies]

To: MNJohnnie

I'll try to be NICER, if you will try to be SMARTER.


345 posted on 10/31/2005 4:19:10 AM PST by Arthur Wildfire! March (The election phase is just running off the fumes of the primary. And the Primary starts Now.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 169 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Alito has a judicial history, and Harry Reid doesn't want him named. Those are two things already in Alito's favor.

Now, when Kerry, Kennedy, Pelosi, Boxer, and hClinton decry naming Alito, we will know he is a much better choice than Miers was.


346 posted on 10/31/2005 4:19:21 AM PST by TomGuy
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Jim Noble
Are there 50 senators today who are ready to support the Constitution?

Almost certainly not.

I disagree. Graham has already said he would oppose a filibuster of this nominee. We just need a couple more of the gang of seven and we can nuke the filibuster.

347 posted on 10/31/2005 4:19:34 AM PST by Always Right
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 326 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March
There is something that bugs me about this choice. It's almost as if saying that Bush can't get a woman past conservatives, a subtle smack at us, who have mostly been pulling for Janice Rogers Brown. I'm not surprised, really. FRegards....

Create a phony strawman and then rail against the choice. On what basis do you infer that conservatives are or are perceived to be against a woman being nominated to the SCOTUS? Conservative opposition to the Miers' nomination had nothing to do with gender. Re Brown: From what I have read and heard, Janice Rogers Brown was not the Conservatives overwhelming choice for the nomination. Rather, we wanted to most qualified person with a proven conservative judicial philosophy and track record. Sex, ethnicity, and race didn't matter.

348 posted on 10/31/2005 4:19:53 AM PST by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 154 | View Replies]

To: Earthdweller

Who cares? Whether Catholic or Protestant Evangelical, he's a believer, almost more importantly today, he's NOT a Muslim, and is a constructionist for all we can see.

What more do you want?


349 posted on 10/31/2005 4:20:00 AM PST by RockinRight (It’s likely for a Conservative to be a Republican, but not always the other way around)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 32 | View Replies]

To: tapatio
I knew this pick would be strong. The president tried to tip toe through the spineless Senate and it didn't work. Due to their weakness they got Miers, and now Alito As this saga unfolds. Miers may not have been a strong choice but it was a choice with the Senate in mind. This time the president threw don't the gauntlet and it will expose the weak links in the Senate.

I expect many here on FR to apply the heat to their local Senators every time they make some weasel spineless speech that sounds like Alito is too big of a pill to swallow. These guys are in trouble big time if they try to jump ship on this pick.
350 posted on 10/31/2005 4:20:12 AM PST by TheForceOfOne
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 214 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

And that is not an accident...


351 posted on 10/31/2005 4:20:43 AM PST by gobucks (Blissful Marriage: A result of a worldly husband's transformation into the Word's wife.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: Mo1

Well, let's us all help get judge Alito through the Senate.

Write or call your Senators everybody.

I wasn't happy about the meanness of the attacks about Miers. I think on some issues she brought experience from private law and executive branch during the WOT that could have been very valuable for the other justices.

But I wasn't happy about that recently uncovered speech from the early 1990's either. That kind of became the deal breaker for me. I was willing to give her a chance in the hearings even so, but despite the embarrassment for President Bush, this new nomination is one the conservatives can't fault him on. Only history will tell if he works out as they hope.

Now we face the Senate. Gird your loins.


352 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:06 AM PST by patriciaruth (They are all Mike Spanns)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 311 | View Replies]

To: TomGuy

But Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.) warned that a nomination of Alito, or any other candidates too far to the right, could run into trouble.

"This is not one of the names I've suggested to the president," Reid said yesterday of Alito on CNN's "Late Edition."

"In fact, I've done the opposite," he said. "I think it would create a lot of problems."


353 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:06 AM PST by kcvl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 346 | View Replies]

To: Arthur Wildfire! March

You know, I find your negative attitude a little off-putting today.


354 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:08 AM PST by Miss Marple (Lord, please look after Mozart Lover's son and keep him strong.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 301 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Bush made a mistake with Miers.

He was given a mulligan.

And he has now hit a HOLE-IN-ONE to win the Masters (to maintain the golf metaphor...)

or if you prefer baseball metaphors:

He has hit a GRAND SLAM HOMERUN to win the World Series.

Let the Dimocrat Baying begin.....

Congratulations to Mr. Alito and to President Bush, and come to think of it, to all Americans!!


355 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:13 AM PST by UncleSamUSA (the land of the free and the home of the brave)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

So this is what standing up for what you believe and freedom feels like.

Man is it going to get ugly. The lies and projections are going to be jaw dropping from the left. The unchallenged comments against this administration and the nominee are going into heavy rotation on all MSM outlets.

I see this as nothing short of a battle for the soul of our country. The founding fathers must have stopped turning and smiled today.


356 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:15 AM PST by Eddie01 (I'm coming to the conclusion I'm really not smart enough to post here.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bill1952

Huh?


357 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:22 AM PST by chris1 ("Make the other guy die for his country" - George S. Patton)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 327 | View Replies]

To: kcvl

Thank you President Bush!


358 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:29 AM PST by Bush gal in LA
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: AFPhys
Whether WE like it or not, if Specter nixes a judicial nominee, that person WILL be defeated.

Oh. We have a one-man confirmation/rejection process now, eh?

I don't think so.

McLame, Chaffee, Warner, Collins and Snowe WILL join him. ... Result: 49-51 against.

So be it. If the Senate votes on the nomination, and it goes down, the process will have worked. Hopefully the Senators will be on record regarding their justification, and the people can consider that at the next election.

359 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:44 AM PST by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 244 | View Replies]

To: Cboldt
Who has been nominated of late without that background?
360 posted on 10/31/2005 4:21:48 AM PST by bill1952 ("All that we do is done with an eye towards something else.")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 232 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20 ... 321-340341-360361-380 ... 1,901-1,920 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson