Skip to comments.
Police used 'dum dum' bullets to kill de Menezes-(incidently, reporters are dum dum)
telegraph ^
| 16/11/2005
| John Steele
Posted on 11/16/2005 7:40:32 AM PST by Flavius
click here to read article
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
To: dsc
Let's not forget that the stupid b*stard was running from the police. No he wasn't. I am all for shooting terrorists in the head repeatedly but Mr de Menezes was, it has emerged, entirely blameless. He wasn't running, he didn't vault the barriers, he wasn't wearing a winter coat on a summers day and his visa was in order.
Just in the wrong place at the wrong time, poor guy.
To: All
Why are the press such idiots when it comes to firearms? The whole point of hollowpoints, at least in a police scenario, is STOPPING power, not necessarily to kill. Get the perp stopped immediately before he can take out anyone else. As for military use, well, we have grenades and bombs, which expand even better.
22
posted on
11/16/2005 8:06:04 AM PST
by
USMCPOP
(Interesting link)
To: KarlInOhio
It would take 10 shots to the head to get him a job at the Guardian.LMAO!! Thanks!
23
posted on
11/16/2005 8:07:06 AM PST
by
anonymous_user
(This space available.)
To: Flavius
yeah lets be sure and just use the politically correct bullet to kill a suspected suicide bomber...how about saving dum dum bullets for stupid journalists?
24
posted on
11/16/2005 8:07:38 AM PST
by
rolling_stone
(Question Authority!)
To: Terabitten
I've never understood the logic of the military not using hollow points.My guess is that military rounds are designed to maim, tie up resources, medics, demoralize the troops, etc. (Kind of interesting that was brought about by "humane" rules of warfare.) Law enforcement bullets, I would again guess, are designed to incapacitate people quickly.
25
posted on
11/16/2005 8:11:36 AM PST
by
anonymous_user
(This space available.)
Comment #26 Removed by Moderator
To: Flavius
The real Dum Dum was when the British first armed their WWII fighter aircraft with 303 machineguns.
27
posted on
11/16/2005 8:12:00 AM PST
by
Deguello
To: USMCPOP
That and also to prevent rounds going through the bodies and going down range to unintended targets
28
posted on
11/16/2005 8:14:40 AM PST
by
Horatio Gates
(Beware the Jack Booted Pugs)
To: mad puppy
"...seven bullets were fired into Mr de Menezes's head and one into his shoulder. " Let's face it... the man did not suffer!
29
posted on
11/16/2005 8:19:20 AM PST
by
CommandoFrank
(Peer into the depths of hell and there you will find the face of Islam...)
To: Flavius
The author of this piece is ill-infomed. Neither so-called "dum dum" nor hollow points were used in the incident.
The rounds were modified "glasers", customarily used in close quarter situations where there is significant risk of a "shoot through" such as aircraft cabins and other confined spaces.
These rounds are, basically, conventional 9mm modified by way of a gelatin-tip filled with around 15-20 PTFE (Teflon) pellets.
30
posted on
11/16/2005 8:25:19 AM PST
by
Selous
To: Flavius
Of course the terrorists who spiked their bombs with nails are exempt from the Hague convention.
31
posted on
11/16/2005 8:27:25 AM PST
by
The Great RJ
("Mir wölle bleiwen wat mir sin" or "We want to remain what we are." ..Luxembourg motto)
To: anonymous_user
A google search on "hoolow" didn't return much, but it did return a hit on
this thread. Perhaps the British police were merely attempting using hoolows to "make him become shinigami again." That would have been nice of them, IMO.
32
posted on
11/16/2005 8:31:44 AM PST
by
r9etb
To: Flavius
Dumdum-ing your own bullets is so fifties...
33
posted on
11/16/2005 8:41:45 AM PST
by
Jaxter
("Vivit Post Funera Virtus")
To: Flavius
Jimmuh Carter is a dum-dum, didn't know they named a bullet after him.
34
posted on
11/16/2005 8:43:53 AM PST
by
Tarpon
To: Terabitten
"I've never understood the logic of the military not using hollow points."
My understanding of rationale behind prohibiting ammo, which expands in the body, (hollow-point ammo is not mentioned in the Geneva Convention) is to reduce the amount of maiming. Too many arms and legs were being lost due to soft point ammo. Full metal jacket bullets will leave a cleaner wound, and result in far fewer amputations. The enemy is taken out of action (for a while at least) -- but is less likely to be permanently maimed.
To: Flavius
36
posted on
11/16/2005 8:58:48 AM PST
by
UnklGene
To: Terabitten
"I'll likely start a flame war over this, but the inability to use hollow points is a prime cause of the failure of the 9mm round in Iraq. I carry 9mm hollow point every day and have no worries about its effectiveness in bringing a bad guy down. I'd never carry 9mm ball, though."
Ditto. I carry 9mm hollow points and am not concerned of stopping a threat. The Muslims in Iraq are also very high on drugs too.
To: USMCPOP
"Why are the press such idiots when it comes to firearms?"
Why is anyone adamantly ignorant. Even on this board, poster constantly confuse magazines with clips.
To: The Grammar Police
"As a matter of fact he was not."
Well, now I don't know what to think. I don't, however, accept the Scotsman article at face value.
39
posted on
11/16/2005 9:22:04 AM PST
by
dsc
To: Terabitten
've never understood the logic of the military not using hollow points. I'm guessing its a matter of cost.
40
posted on
11/16/2005 9:23:38 AM PST
by
AdamSelene235
(Truth has become so rare and precious she is always attended to by a bodyguard of lies.)
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-20, 21-40, 41-52 next last
Disclaimer:
Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual
posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its
management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the
exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson