 |
 |
 |
|
|
 |
||
 |
 |
 |
why doesn't the MSM just force Woodward to spill the beans?
Because they would rather speculate.
Just for the record, I wasn't Woodward's source either...
I thought they were all so sure that Rove was the source. Remember our buddy Laurence O'Donnell screaming "it's Rove, it's Rove''? Now they're stopping every man on the street corner and asking "are you the source"? This whole case is just a big bunch of BS.
My money is on Joe Wilson being the source.
(Just for the record) I was not his source either.
Can't we just get Congress to vote on this and moveon.com?
Great. Now they're slinging mud at Condi to see if it will stick.
The funny thing is most Americans don't even know who Bob Woodward is.
From the America Thinker website:
From the December 30, 2003 letter by Acting Attorney General Corney referring tha matter to Fitzgerald for investigation, we get this description of the Plame matter:
"all the authority of the Attorney General with respect to the Department's investigation into the alleged unauthorized disclosure of a CIA employee's identity" [emphasis added].
From Fitzgerald's most recent filing:
"The charges arose from an investigation concerning alleged leaks to reporters of classified information regarding the employment of a purported CIA official by one or more government officials." [emphasis added].
Is this a partial admission that the basis of the referral has not been met?
Clarice Feldman 11 20 05
Wonder when Richard A. Clarke's name will surface a leak? Oh wait he's a dim.
| |
|
|
|
|
|
||
|
|
|
What a laugh. I cannot see why ANYONE would open their mouth in front of that scumbag weasel Woodward.
If they do, they deserve to get hosed in some way by him. It is just what he does.
I think Woodward then told others what he had learned about Plame. I think that the reason that Woodward keeps emphasizing the casualness of the spread of the information is that Woodward wants to get himself off the hook.