Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

McCartney attacks China over fur
BBC ^ | 11/28/05 | Adrian Addison

Posted on 11/28/2005 11:40:43 AM PST by bloggodocio

Sir Paul McCartney has vowed never to perform in China after seeing horrific undercover footage of dogs and cats being killed for their fur.

The former Beatle also said he would boycott the 2008 Beijing Olympics after viewing the footage taken in a fur market in Guangzhou, southern China.

The film shows animals being thrown from a bus, and into boiling water.

A Chinese official said boycotts were not justified, and blamed US and European consumers for buying the fur.

In the film, dogs and cats packed by the dozen into wire cages little bigger than lobster pots are pictured being thrown from the top deck of a converted bus onto concrete pavements.

The screaming animals, many with their paws now smashed from the fall, are then lifted out with long metal tongs and thrown over a seven foot fence.

They are then killed and skinned for their fur.

Animal welfare group Peta believes many of them are still alive as their skins are peeled away.

Sir Paul, and his wife Heather, looked aghast and close to tears as they watched the footage for a special report for the BBC's Six O'clock News to be screened on Monday.

They urged people not to buy Chinese goods.

"This is barbaric. Horrific," said Sir Paul.

"It's like something out of the dark ages. And they seem to get a kick out it. They're just sick, sick people.

"I wouldn't even dream of going over there to play, in the same way I wouldn't go to a country that supported apartheid. This is just disgusting. It's just against every rule of humanity. I couldn't go there."

In another piece of the harrowing footage, shot this summer by an undercover investigator connected to the People for the Ethical treatment of Animals (Peta) campaign group, cats are seen squirming inside a sack which is then thrown into a vat of steaming water.

They are boiled to death and skinned by a fleecing machine similar to a launderette tumble drier.

Some of the 28-minute footage is too gruesome to be broadcast.

Campaigners estimate that over two million dogs and cats are killed for their fur in China every year. China also farms animals such as mink for their fur and makes over half of the world's fur products.

McCartney added: "How can the host nation of the Olympics be seen allowing animals to be treated in this terrible way?"

Heather McCartney, herself a vociferous animal rights campaigner added: "I've seen so much footage where these poor creatures are clearly alive when they're skinned. And for what? For fashion? It's sick.

"People in every other country in the world should now boycott Chinese goods."

"If they want to consider themselves a civilized nation," said Sir Paul, "they're going to have to stop this."

A spokesman for the Chinese Ambassador in London told the BBC: "Though cats and dogs are not endangered, we do not encourage the ill treatment of cats and dogs.

"But, anyway, the fur trade mostly feeds markets in the US and Europe. Most of this fur is not for the Chinese market. So the Americans and Europeans should accept the blame.

"We have no plans to clamp down on this internally that I am aware of - it is for the US and Europeans to take their own action. They should boycott fur as a fashion material.

"I do not agree with Mr McCartney and his wife's point of view - a boycott of Chinese goods and the Olympics is simply not justifiable."

It is not currently illegal to trade in dog and cat fur in the UK and most of Europe.

Ethical abhorrence

But the UK government sees any legislation as being a European issue - as once the fur enters Europe from China, free trade and the difficulty of identifying the fur makes it almost impossible to police.

A DTI spokesman told the BBC: "The government shares the ethical abhorrence felt by many. That is why it banned by statute fur farming in the UK in 2000.

"Action is best taken at the EU level as a harmonised approach throughout the EU would have greater impact and avoid obstacles to the operation of the single market."

There is little evidence, as yet, of the fur products being sold in the UK. Campaigners insist they are available up and down the country, but it is impossible to tell the difference from other fur without the aid of expensive genetic tests.

The British Fur Trade Association, which represents the booming fur industry in the UK, insists that its members do not knowingly use dog and cat fur and have introduced a fur labelling system to try to guard against its use.

"As an industry, we are against any form of animal cruelty," said a spokeswoman.

"We deplore and work against the mistreatment of animals. For this reason, we also actively support and encourage the adoption of Western fur farming practices on Chinese fur farms."

Ruse accusation

But pro-fur campaigner Richard D North says a European ban is heavy handed.

"This is a ruse by campaigners to attack the legitimate fur trade. Nobody has ever found a large amount of cat and dog fur in the UK.

"The European fur industry would never use it. Why bother, when there are lovely skins from properly farmed animals?"

Euro MP Struan Stevenson has an array of cat and dog products in his Brussels office - including a coat made from Alsatian skin, a pelt made from four golden retrievers and a blanket made from around 70 cats. All were bought in Europe.

"It's cheaper to make these things from cat and dog than it is to make synthetic fur," he told the BBC.

"It really is time for this trade to be banned and the EU border to be sealed against it. And the new trade commissioner is more than sympathetic."

Markos Kyprianou, EU Commissioner for Health and Consumer Protection, is responsible for this area of EU law.

His spokesman, Phillip Todd, told the BBC: "As a human being, the commissioner abhors this trade and is very supportive of there being a ban. There are, however, legal obstacles which would need to be addressed before a ban could be put in place."


TOPICS: Foreign Affairs
KEYWORDS:
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last
It's nice to see that Sir Paul really has a way of putting Chinese atrocities in perspective.

Bloggodocio

1 posted on 11/28/2005 11:40:44 AM PST by bloggodocio
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
So the Chinese have to choose between giving up dog and cat fur, or giving up McCartney concerts?

Anybody taking bets on which way they'll go?

2 posted on 11/28/2005 11:42:54 AM PST by Izzy Dunne (Hello, I'm a TAGLINE virus. Please help me spread by copying me into YOUR tag line.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

What about not performing in China because it's...... well...... CHINA!


3 posted on 11/28/2005 11:43:00 AM PST by jdm
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
It's nice to see that Sir Paul really has a way of putting Chinese atrocities in perspective.

My thoughts exactly.

4 posted on 11/28/2005 11:43:03 AM PST by inquest (FTAA delenda est)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

Sir Paul seems to have too much time on his hands.


5 posted on 11/28/2005 11:44:19 AM PST by A. Morgan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
Paul is a good man!

Get a better grip.

6 posted on 11/28/2005 11:45:03 AM PST by beyond the sea (Murtha: Redeployment - What .......Surrender? // “Victory is not a strategy”)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

I really hate to side with PETA on something, but that is just disgusting. I'm not opposed to skinning animals, but let's keep it humane.

I do love how China tries to pawn it off on American and Europe:

"A Chinese official said boycotts were not justified, and blamed US and European consumers for buying the fur. "

Dang! He forgot to blame to Jews too! Oh well, maybe next time...


7 posted on 11/28/2005 11:45:15 AM PST by Zeppelin (Stop Global Warming. Shut a Liberal's Mouth.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

I was kinda thinking the same thing while I read the article.
susie


8 posted on 11/28/2005 11:46:18 AM PST by brytlea (I'm not a conspiracty theorist....really.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

What a lighweight schlock artist he is!


9 posted on 11/28/2005 11:46:22 AM PST by Gay State Conservative
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Zeppelin
I really hate to side with PETA on something, but that is just disgusting. I'm not opposed to skinning animals, but let's keep it humane.

I agree.

10 posted on 11/28/2005 11:47:07 AM PST by Skooz (1. I am Torgo, I take care of the place while the Master is away. 2.Santa's laughter mocks the poor.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

11 posted on 11/28/2005 11:47:30 AM PST by Republican Red (We will stay steadfast, we will not falter, we will never murtha)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

Sir Paul wouldnt dream of going to a country that has paratheid. Maybe he should go over and see what happens when apartheid ends and the stealing of white farmers property begins.I am sure he would rather see starvation than apartheid.


12 posted on 11/28/2005 11:47:49 AM PST by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

I was thinking the same thing. Nice to know that dogs and cats rank higher on his radar than baby girls.


13 posted on 11/28/2005 11:47:55 AM PST by Aggie Mama
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
Call me a skeptic, but I didn't know that dog and cat fur was fashionable in the West.
14 posted on 11/28/2005 11:49:11 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

he's also active banning landmines. but if more Chinese stepped on landmines, they wouldn't be wearing fur.


15 posted on 11/28/2005 11:50:05 AM PST by Rakkasan1 (Peace de Resistance! Viva la Paper towels!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: A. Morgan
>Sir Paul seems to have too much time on his hands

I want a horse. I want a sheep.
I want to get me a good night's sleep.
Living in a home
In the heart of the country.

I'm gonna move. I'm gonna go.
I'm gonna tell everyone I know.
Living in a home
In the heart of the country.

Heart of the country --
Where the holy people grow.
Heart of the country --
Smell the grass in the meadow.

Wo wo wo . . .


16 posted on 11/28/2005 11:51:35 AM PST by theFIRMbss
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

Yet he performed in Moscow. Has he not seen all those fur hats the Russian men where? Or the beautiful fur coats worn by the Russian women, in a far greater percentage than they do here in the U.S.

Shut up and sing Paul, shut up and sing.


17 posted on 11/28/2005 11:53:16 AM PST by NavyCanDo
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

Gee, Paul, I'll bet THAT'S going to stop them! Why don't you throw in "destroy you nuclear weapons", too. I bet they'll do it.


18 posted on 11/28/2005 11:54:10 AM PST by Right Wing Assault ("..this administration is planning a 'Right Wing Assault' on values and ideals.." - John Kerry)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio

Another bothersome thing about this story is that dogs and cats are eaten as food in southern China. In fact northern Vietnam was having a big problem with field rats a couple years ago because all the local cats were being stolen and shipped across the border to China.

So are they stripped of fur before going to the supermarket?

Many oddities here.


19 posted on 11/28/2005 11:54:54 AM PST by angkor
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: bloggodocio
While I agree with the buy nothing from China angle The is the PeTA angle makes me want to support them. I guess I'll just have to boycott China while eating meat. That'll work.
20 posted on 11/28/2005 11:55:31 AM PST by CzarNicky (The problem with bad ideas is that they seemed like good ideas at the time.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-4041-6061-8081-97 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson