Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: AntiGuv

Dunno why I hiccuped!

BTW, one of the biggest arguments against the notion that the Roman defenses were predicated on the Chinese defenses is that the Roman frontier defenses were never systematic in the same way that the Chinese defenses were. More importantly, we do have considerable records of the development of the Roman Limes and of the Great Wall and to my knowledge there is no record of the Romans acknowledging the alleged Chinese origin of the idea.

Finally, we have a good sense of how familiar the Romans were with China and the Chinese were with Rome and it's quite clear that they had nothing but the very dimmest conception that one another existed.


7 posted on 12/20/2005 10:11:16 AM PST by AntiGuv (™)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies ]


To: AntiGuv

While I wholeheartedly agree that there's not likely any connection between the development of walls, the Roman Empire and China had continual trade links, both overland and (more intermittently) by sea, usually by go-betweens, but occasionally directly.


38 posted on 03/19/2006 3:43:48 PM PST by SunkenCiv (Yes indeed, Civ updated his profile and links pages again, on Monday, March 6, 2006.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson