Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
To: slowhand520
2 posted on
12/20/2005 11:01:26 AM PST by
houeto
(Mr. President, close our borders now!)
To: slowhand520
3 posted on
12/20/2005 11:02:34 AM PST by
Chuck54
(Free Scooter, Indict Joe W)
To: slowhand520
His concerns didn't stop him from flying to the Middle East to warn that an attack on Iraq was imminent. Disingenuous POS that he is....
4 posted on
12/20/2005 11:02:50 AM PST by
NRA1995
(Jesus is the reason for the season)
To: slowhand520
" Forgive me if I find this to be inconsistent and a bit disingenuous.”
Forgive me if I think that Jay Rockefeller is ( again) the source of the leak of highly classified material which has endangered national security.
Forgive me if I hope to see Jay Rockefeller frog marched off to Leavenworth.
To: slowhand520
A nice sock in the mouth. Way to go, Roberts
6 posted on
12/20/2005 11:04:35 AM PST by
Pukin Dog
(Sans Reproache)
To: slowhand520
7 posted on
12/20/2005 11:05:07 AM PST by
toddlintown
(Lennon takes six bullets to the chest, Yoko is standing right next to him and not one f'ing bullet?)
To: slowhand520
Looks like Sen. Roberts won't be having Navy Bean Soup with Sen. Rockefeller in the Senate cafeteria anymore.
To: slowhand520
Good post. Another news item showing a Dem to be a liar. No doubt it'll be front page news tomorrow on the NY Times or CBS programs.
To: slowhand520; Mo1
10 posted on
12/20/2005 11:07:34 AM PST by
Howlin
(Defeatism may have its partisan uses, but it is not justified by the facts. - GWB, 12/18/05)
To: slowhand520
"His most recent expression of support was only two weeks ago."
LOL. Rockefeller will respond by saying "Um, I was too stupid to figure out what the Administration was briefing us on, so I just agreed with it. Yes, that's it."
11 posted on
12/20/2005 11:07:54 AM PST by
frankjr
To: slowhand520
It's not really whether he had concerns or not.
If he had concerns, they evidently weren't large enough to force the issue.
12 posted on
12/20/2005 11:08:48 AM PST by
the OlLine Rebel
(Common sense is an uncommon virtue.)
To: slowhand520
In fact, it is my recollection that on many occasions Senator Rockefeller expressed to the Vice President his vocal support for the program. His most recent expression of support was only two weeks ago. This Roberts guy looks like a straight shooter, and I think he just hit Rockefeller right between the eyes.
14 posted on
12/20/2005 11:10:10 AM PST by
oldbrowser
(Release the Barrett Report)
To: slowhand520
"Senator Rockefeller expressed to the Vice President his vocal support for the program. His most recent expression of support was only two weeks ago."
Have we have found the Kerry Flip-Flop Championship Winner for '05?
15 posted on
12/20/2005 11:10:32 AM PST by
Wasanother
(Terrorist come in many forms but all are RATS.)
To: slowhand520
wasn't he the one who went to syria before the war and told them that we definately WOULD invade Iraq?
17 posted on
12/20/2005 11:11:17 AM PST by
camle
(keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
To: slowhand520
Sen. Jay Rockefeller...to F'ing stupid to understand contents of security briefings...to F'ing stupid to understand his anti-American remarks hurt the troops and the war effort...yet smart enough to keep a 2 1/2 year old note just in case. This turd is as transparent a window....
19 posted on
12/20/2005 11:11:27 AM PST by
ScreamingFist
( The RKBA doesn't apply if I have a bigger gun than your bodyguard. NRA)
To: slowhand520
We all caught the same declaration?
fact, it is my recollection that on many occasions Senator Rockefeller expressed to the Vice President his vocal support for the program. His most recent expression of support was only two weeks ago.
Busted!
BTW, did Cheney ever get that letter? Just curious if that was verified. I wouldn't be surprised if he never even sent it.
20 posted on
12/20/2005 11:11:49 AM PST by
Soul Seeker
(Mr. President: It is now time to turn over the money changers' tables.)
To: slowhand520
I wonder how many Shirley Temple's it took to get Roberts to pipe-off.
22 posted on
12/20/2005 11:12:09 AM PST by
johnny7
(“Check out the big brain on Brett!”)
To: slowhand520
And we're supposed to know Rockyfellah wrote his letter before last night how exactly? Oh, I know, I bet we're supposed to take his word for it model of integrity that he's shown himself to be in the past.
Pat Roberts Rocks!
23 posted on
12/20/2005 11:12:38 AM PST by
Let's Roll
( "Congressmen who ... undermine the military ... should be arrested, exiled or hanged" - A. Lincoln)
To: slowhand520
"His most recent expression of support was only two weeks ago."
The dems are going to get burned badly on this. Not only have all presidents since FDR (and maybe even before) used warrantless surveillance, but now any chance the dems had to pretend to be strong on national security is blown away. Congratulating themselves on killing the Patriot Act and now trying to take one of our intelligence weapons away = useless, dangerous weenies.
27 posted on
12/20/2005 11:14:03 AM PST by
hsalaw
To: slowhand520
The Senate Rats are all pompous asses who think they are above all, just watch C-Span and observe their better than thou appearance.
28 posted on
12/20/2005 11:14:03 AM PST by
boomop1
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-40, 41-60, 61-79 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson