Frist Joins Boy Scouts To Call For Passage Of Scouts Act

The Chattanogan ^ | 12.17.05 | ELIZABETH WEILL-GREENBERG

[YOUGOTIT]

For those of you that believe the ACLU gets no tax money please read the following law:

USC section 1988 fees are awarded to the ACLU or any other plaintiff in Establishment Clause cases

[YOUGOTIT]

Again I say: DO NOT BELIEVE anything you read on the ACLU web site their founder was an anti-American Communist who founded the ACLU to covertly destroy the United States, and they are doing a good job of it.

The LAW IS: "USC section 1988 fees (from tax money) are awarded to the ACLU in Establishment Clause cases," which means any suit the ACLU brings period.

[loboinok]

Its the ACLU!

http://stoptheaclu.com/archives/2005/06/01/public-expression-of-religion-act-of-2005-introduced-in-house/

[rzeznikj at stout]

The specific law is 42 USC s.1988

While the ACLU is not explicitly mentioned in the text of the law, because it is considered a civil rights group (albeit as a misnomer), it is entitled to receive public funds.

Click Here for 42 USC s.1988

[YOUGOTIT]

Title 42, Chapter 21, Subchapter I, Section 1988 is the mother’s milk of the United States Code for the ACLU. It authorizes the payment of attorney’s fees in cases involving civil rights. Sounds harmless enough, right? Sorry, bucko, it turns out that you are paying the ACLU’s invoice every time they launch another lawsuit. Are you happy to pay the ACLU $700,000 to kick the Boy Scouts out of a San Diego park, $500,000 to get those awful ten commandments out of Judge Roy Moore’s courthouse, and millions to prosecute every creche and cross and star of David on public property

http://www.dinocrat.com/archives/2004/12/04/repeal-42-usc-1988/

Or you can search the USC.

[MNJohnnie]

Any Freeper Legal Eagles around? Can you explain the legal point on this thread for me? Need someone a lot more knowledgeable on the Judiciary and how the Courts work since it seems fairly obvious my point is being misunderstood or ignored. Our side sounds nuts when it goes on these Tin Foil Hat rants about the ACLU. The ACLU needs to be destroyed but this sort of "Taxpayer funding for the ACLU" nonsense discredits the legitimate arguments against the ACLU made by the Right

[Condor51]

***USC section 1988 fees are awarded to the ACLU or any other plaintiff in Establishment Clause cases***

You're missing something?!?

What 'Title' of the USC (US CODE) is this section '1988' under?? (Like Title 1 or Title 18, etc.) because I'd really like to read it.

thanks :-)

[Non-Sequitur]

The only complaint I would have is that it's too specific. If the senator wants to pass a law saying that the Boy Scouts, as a private organization, have the right to exclude whom they want from membership and still be able to receive certain kinds of government assistance without having to comply with anti-discriminiation laws, then they should also extend that same protection to other private organizations. Otherwise I think it'll be open to legal challenge.

[rzeznikj at stout]

Title 42. See post 24--there's a link to the law

[jazusamo]

Boy, I opened a can of worms with that one, didn't I?

[Hunble]

It's about freaking time!

[YOUGOTIT]

42 USC s.1988

[Condor51]

Thanks I think I found it:

TITLE 42, CHAPTER 21, SUBCHAPTER I, § 1988
§ 1988. Proceedings in vindication of civil rights

~~snip~~

(b) Attorney’s fees
In any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of sections 1981, 1981a, 1982, 1983, 1985, and 1986 of this title, title IX of Public Law 92–318 [20 U.S.C. 1681 et seq.], the Religious Freedom Restoration Act of 1993 [42 U.S.C. 2000bb et seq.], the Religious Land Use and Institutionalized Persons Act of 2000 [42 U.S.C. 2000cc et seq.], title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 [42 U.S.C. 2000d et seq.], or section 13981 of this title, the court, in its discretion, may allow the prevailing party, other than the United States, a reasonable attorney’s fee as part of the costs, except that in any action brought against a judicial officer for an act or omission taken in such officer’s judicial capacity such officer shall not be held liable for any costs, including attorney’s fees, unless such action was clearly in excess of such officer’s jurisdiction.

(c) Expert fees In awarding an attorney’s fee under subsection (b) of this section in any action or proceeding to enforce a provision of section 1981 or 1981a of this title, the court, in its discretion, may include expert fees as part of the attorney’s fee.

[Marine_Uncle]

I surely hope this bill will be passed without any decenting objections. The Boy Scouts of America often give much back to communities that some may not realize. For those that may not know. Eagle Scout projects often can take the form of civil projects. For instance improvements in local parks, playgrounds, work projects on stream improvement, and countless other really worth while things. All are winners in supporting our Scouts of both genders. And lets face it. Many a young boy is influenced in a good way, given the chances to do things he otherwise would only dream of doing. Hiking, camping, outdoor cooking, summer camps, advancing in rank, personal achievments, learning many skills he would otherwise not perhaps ever learn..... that take him off the street and make a good citizen of him for the future. And who can discount that we need more of .........On my honor I will do my best to obey the scout law, to keep myself physically strong, mentally awake, and morally straight is not needed in our leaders of the future.
Hope I have it in the correct order been a few years. WWW to them that belong. I was a member of Unami Lodge #1 on the mighty Delaware. Yea back in the 60's. But those principals tend to stay with us scouts.

[Coleus]

Many Boy Scouts are our future soldiers of America. Where else would they put it? >>

good point

[Coleus]

Stop taxpayer funding of the ACLU

WorldNetDaily: Pull plug on ACLU
Part-Time Pundit: ACLU Funding Threatened

Support the ACLU
Center for Reclaiming America -- NEWS You Won't hear on the News!

[jazusamo]

Thanks for taking the time to list these links, I appreciate it.

[Coleus]

To tell you the truth, I wasn't sure myself.

But then again, in 1969, while a congressman, George H.W. "rubbers" Bush along with another pub and 2 democrats wrote the Title X funding law which helps support planned parenthood. So, nothing fazes me anymore.